急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔的临床特点及不同治疗方法的预后比较。

Chun Fu, Q. Gao, Zhou Zhao, Yu, Jian Liu, Y. An
{"title":"急性心肌梗死合并室间隔穿孔的临床特点及不同治疗方法的预后比较。","authors":"Chun Fu, Q. Gao, Zhou Zhao, Yu, Jian Liu, Y. An","doi":"10.21203/rs.3.rs-75606/v1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"OBJECTIVE\nTo explore the clinical characteristics of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with ventricular septal perforation (VSR), the prognosis comparison of different treatment methods, and analysis of related risk factors.\n\n\nMETHODS\nFrom January 2006 to February 2020, 29 patients with AMI and VSR diagnosed in the People's Hospital of Peking University were selected as the study group. Among them, 16 cases were male (55.2%), 13 cases were female (44.8%), and the average age was 64.69 ± 10.32 years old. They were divided into two groups: the survival group (N = 16) and non-survival group (N = 13), according to whether they survived within 30 days of surgical or drug conservative treatment. The clinical characteristics, coronary angiography, and treatment of the two groups were summarized, and the prognosis and related risk factors were analyzed.\n\n\nRESULTS\nThere was no significant difference in the basic clinical characteristics between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with the results of coronary angiography in the two groups, the proportion of the culprit vessel, which was a simple anterior descending branch in the non-survival group, was higher than that in the survival group. There was a statistical difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). The perioperative data of the two groups showed that the proportion of patients with complete revascularization, simultaneous bypass, and recanalization of culprit vessels in the survival group was significantly higher than that in the non-survival group (P < 0.05). However, the incidence of postoperative low cardiac output and mortality during hospitalization in the survival group were significantly lower than those in the non-survival group (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that complete revascularization (OR = 0.021, 95% CI 0.001-0.374, P = 0.009) and recanalization of culprit vessels (OR = 0.045, 95% CI 0.004-0.548, P = 0.015) were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that during the follow-up period, the long-term survival rate of patients with operation and complete revascularization was significantly higher than that of patients with drug conservative treatment and incomplete revascularization. There was a statistical difference between the two groups (P < 0.05).\n\n\nCONCLUSION\nComplete revascularization and recanalization of culprit vessels are independent risk factors for 30-day mortality in patients with AMI and VSR. The long-term survival rate of patients after surgery and complete revascularization is significantly higher than that of patients with conservative medical treatment and incomplete revascularization. Surgery and complete revascularization are important factors affecting the long-term prognosis of patients with AMI and VSR.","PeriodicalId":257138,"journal":{"name":"The heart surgery forum","volume":"72 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Clinical Characteristics of Acute Myocardial Infarction with Ventricular Septal Perforation and the Prognosis Comparison of Different Treatment Methods.\",\"authors\":\"Chun Fu, Q. Gao, Zhou Zhao, Yu, Jian Liu, Y. An\",\"doi\":\"10.21203/rs.3.rs-75606/v1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"OBJECTIVE\\nTo explore the clinical characteristics of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with ventricular septal perforation (VSR), the prognosis comparison of different treatment methods, and analysis of related risk factors.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nFrom January 2006 to February 2020, 29 patients with AMI and VSR diagnosed in the People's Hospital of Peking University were selected as the study group. Among them, 16 cases were male (55.2%), 13 cases were female (44.8%), and the average age was 64.69 ± 10.32 years old. They were divided into two groups: the survival group (N = 16) and non-survival group (N = 13), according to whether they survived within 30 days of surgical or drug conservative treatment. The clinical characteristics, coronary angiography, and treatment of the two groups were summarized, and the prognosis and related risk factors were analyzed.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nThere was no significant difference in the basic clinical characteristics between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with the results of coronary angiography in the two groups, the proportion of the culprit vessel, which was a simple anterior descending branch in the non-survival group, was higher than that in the survival group. There was a statistical difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). The perioperative data of the two groups showed that the proportion of patients with complete revascularization, simultaneous bypass, and recanalization of culprit vessels in the survival group was significantly higher than that in the non-survival group (P < 0.05). However, the incidence of postoperative low cardiac output and mortality during hospitalization in the survival group were significantly lower than those in the non-survival group (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that complete revascularization (OR = 0.021, 95% CI 0.001-0.374, P = 0.009) and recanalization of culprit vessels (OR = 0.045, 95% CI 0.004-0.548, P = 0.015) were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that during the follow-up period, the long-term survival rate of patients with operation and complete revascularization was significantly higher than that of patients with drug conservative treatment and incomplete revascularization. There was a statistical difference between the two groups (P < 0.05).\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSION\\nComplete revascularization and recanalization of culprit vessels are independent risk factors for 30-day mortality in patients with AMI and VSR. The long-term survival rate of patients after surgery and complete revascularization is significantly higher than that of patients with conservative medical treatment and incomplete revascularization. Surgery and complete revascularization are important factors affecting the long-term prognosis of patients with AMI and VSR.\",\"PeriodicalId\":257138,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The heart surgery forum\",\"volume\":\"72 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The heart surgery forum\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-75606/v1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The heart surgery forum","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-75606/v1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的探讨急性心肌梗死(AMI)合并室间隔穿孔(VSR)的临床特点、不同治疗方法的预后比较及相关危险因素分析。方法选择2006年1月~ 2020年2月北京大学人民医院确诊的AMI合并VSR患者29例为研究对象。其中男性16例(55.2%),女性13例(44.8%),平均年龄64.69±10.32岁。根据手术或药物保守治疗后30天内是否存活,将患者分为生存组(N = 16)和非生存组(N = 13)。总结两组患者的临床特点、冠状动脉造影及治疗情况,分析预后及相关危险因素。结果两组患者的基本临床特征比较,差异无统计学意义(P > 0.05)。与两组冠状动脉造影结果比较,非生存组为单纯前降支的罪魁祸首血管比例高于生存组。两组比较差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。两组围手术期资料显示,生存组患者行完全血运重建、同时搭桥、罪犯血管再通的比例显著高于非生存组(P < 0.05)。但生存组术后低心输出量发生率及住院期间死亡率显著低于非生存组(P < 0.05)。Logistic回归分析显示,完全血运重建(OR = 0.021, 95% CI 0.001-0.374, P = 0.009)和祸首血管再通(OR = 0.045, 95% CI 0.004-0.548, P = 0.015)是30天死亡率的独立危险因素。Kaplan-Meier生存曲线显示,在随访期间,手术和完全血运重建术患者的长期生存率明显高于药物保守治疗和不完全血运重建术患者。两组比较差异有统计学意义(P < 0.05)。结论罪犯血管的完全血运重建和再通是AMI和VSR患者30天死亡率的独立危险因素。术后完全血运重建术患者的长期生存率明显高于保守治疗和不完全血运重建术患者。手术和完全血运重建术是影响AMI和VSR患者长期预后的重要因素。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Clinical Characteristics of Acute Myocardial Infarction with Ventricular Septal Perforation and the Prognosis Comparison of Different Treatment Methods.
OBJECTIVE To explore the clinical characteristics of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with ventricular septal perforation (VSR), the prognosis comparison of different treatment methods, and analysis of related risk factors. METHODS From January 2006 to February 2020, 29 patients with AMI and VSR diagnosed in the People's Hospital of Peking University were selected as the study group. Among them, 16 cases were male (55.2%), 13 cases were female (44.8%), and the average age was 64.69 ± 10.32 years old. They were divided into two groups: the survival group (N = 16) and non-survival group (N = 13), according to whether they survived within 30 days of surgical or drug conservative treatment. The clinical characteristics, coronary angiography, and treatment of the two groups were summarized, and the prognosis and related risk factors were analyzed. RESULTS There was no significant difference in the basic clinical characteristics between the two groups (P > 0.05). Compared with the results of coronary angiography in the two groups, the proportion of the culprit vessel, which was a simple anterior descending branch in the non-survival group, was higher than that in the survival group. There was a statistical difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). The perioperative data of the two groups showed that the proportion of patients with complete revascularization, simultaneous bypass, and recanalization of culprit vessels in the survival group was significantly higher than that in the non-survival group (P < 0.05). However, the incidence of postoperative low cardiac output and mortality during hospitalization in the survival group were significantly lower than those in the non-survival group (P < 0.05). Logistic regression analysis showed that complete revascularization (OR = 0.021, 95% CI 0.001-0.374, P = 0.009) and recanalization of culprit vessels (OR = 0.045, 95% CI 0.004-0.548, P = 0.015) were independent risk factors for 30-day mortality. Kaplan-Meier survival curve showed that during the follow-up period, the long-term survival rate of patients with operation and complete revascularization was significantly higher than that of patients with drug conservative treatment and incomplete revascularization. There was a statistical difference between the two groups (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION Complete revascularization and recanalization of culprit vessels are independent risk factors for 30-day mortality in patients with AMI and VSR. The long-term survival rate of patients after surgery and complete revascularization is significantly higher than that of patients with conservative medical treatment and incomplete revascularization. Surgery and complete revascularization are important factors affecting the long-term prognosis of patients with AMI and VSR.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信