基于PAgP和LACP协议的以太网通道技术在Cisco交换设备上的实现与分析

D. E. Kurniawan, M. Iqbal, Adhitya Adhitya
{"title":"基于PAgP和LACP协议的以太网通道技术在Cisco交换设备上的实现与分析","authors":"D. E. Kurniawan, M. Iqbal, Adhitya Adhitya","doi":"10.1109/ic2ie53219.2021.9649157","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A fast and reliable computer network is needed for a company. However, network infrastructure is often not considered, so the unmet network infrastructure needs become the background in this study. The problem of network infrastructure is very influential on the bandwidth of the network. Bandwidth issues can be fixed by using EtherChannel technology. In this research, EtherChannel technology is implemented, and the protocol is analyzed, namely PAgP and LACP. The scenarios in this research use the concept of client-server. The measured parameters are delay, jitter, packet loss, and throughput on file-sharing / FTP and video stream. The result on Delay, PAgP is around 12% better than LACP. Then in the Jitter test on FTP services, the PAgP protocol is 2.3% better than the LACP protocol in measuring FTP Jitter. And in the FTP Packet loss test, testing on the PAgP protocol is superior by getting a smaller percentage of packet loss, which is 0.18% in the PAgP protocol and 0.232% for the LACP protocol. The FTP throughput testing in the PAgP protocol gets an average yield of 83.8 Mbps, while the LACP protocol gets test results of 77.68 Mbps. While testing the video stream delay, jitter video stream, and video stream throughput, the LACP protocol is 2.2%, 23%, and 0.05% better than the PAgP protocol.","PeriodicalId":178443,"journal":{"name":"2021 4th International Conference of Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE)","volume":"62 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation and Analysis of The EtherChannel Technology Using PAgP and LACP Protocols on Cisco Switch Devices\",\"authors\":\"D. E. Kurniawan, M. Iqbal, Adhitya Adhitya\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ic2ie53219.2021.9649157\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"A fast and reliable computer network is needed for a company. However, network infrastructure is often not considered, so the unmet network infrastructure needs become the background in this study. The problem of network infrastructure is very influential on the bandwidth of the network. Bandwidth issues can be fixed by using EtherChannel technology. In this research, EtherChannel technology is implemented, and the protocol is analyzed, namely PAgP and LACP. The scenarios in this research use the concept of client-server. The measured parameters are delay, jitter, packet loss, and throughput on file-sharing / FTP and video stream. The result on Delay, PAgP is around 12% better than LACP. Then in the Jitter test on FTP services, the PAgP protocol is 2.3% better than the LACP protocol in measuring FTP Jitter. And in the FTP Packet loss test, testing on the PAgP protocol is superior by getting a smaller percentage of packet loss, which is 0.18% in the PAgP protocol and 0.232% for the LACP protocol. The FTP throughput testing in the PAgP protocol gets an average yield of 83.8 Mbps, while the LACP protocol gets test results of 77.68 Mbps. While testing the video stream delay, jitter video stream, and video stream throughput, the LACP protocol is 2.2%, 23%, and 0.05% better than the PAgP protocol.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178443,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 4th International Conference of Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE)\",\"volume\":\"62 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 4th International Conference of Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ic2ie53219.2021.9649157\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 4th International Conference of Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ic2ie53219.2021.9649157","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

一个公司需要一个快速可靠的计算机网络。然而,网络基础设施往往没有被考虑,因此未满足的网络基础设施需求成为本研究的背景。网络基础设施问题对网络带宽的影响很大。带宽问题可以通过使用EtherChannel技术来解决。本研究实现了EtherChannel技术,并对协议进行了分析,即PAgP和LACP。本研究中的场景使用了客户机-服务器的概念。测量的参数包括文件共享/ FTP和视频流的延迟、抖动、丢包和吞吐量。在延迟方面,PAgP比LACP好12%左右。然后在FTP服务的Jitter测试中,PAgP协议比LACP协议测量FTP Jitter的效果好2.3%。在FTP丢包测试中,PAgP协议的丢包率较低,为0.18%,LACP协议的丢包率为0.232%。在PAgP协议中FTP吞吐量测试的平均yield为83.8 Mbps,而在LACP协议中FTP吞吐量测试的平均yield为77.68 Mbps。在测试视频流延迟、视频流抖动和视频流吞吐量时,LACP协议比PAgP协议分别提高2.2%、23%和0.05%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation and Analysis of The EtherChannel Technology Using PAgP and LACP Protocols on Cisco Switch Devices
A fast and reliable computer network is needed for a company. However, network infrastructure is often not considered, so the unmet network infrastructure needs become the background in this study. The problem of network infrastructure is very influential on the bandwidth of the network. Bandwidth issues can be fixed by using EtherChannel technology. In this research, EtherChannel technology is implemented, and the protocol is analyzed, namely PAgP and LACP. The scenarios in this research use the concept of client-server. The measured parameters are delay, jitter, packet loss, and throughput on file-sharing / FTP and video stream. The result on Delay, PAgP is around 12% better than LACP. Then in the Jitter test on FTP services, the PAgP protocol is 2.3% better than the LACP protocol in measuring FTP Jitter. And in the FTP Packet loss test, testing on the PAgP protocol is superior by getting a smaller percentage of packet loss, which is 0.18% in the PAgP protocol and 0.232% for the LACP protocol. The FTP throughput testing in the PAgP protocol gets an average yield of 83.8 Mbps, while the LACP protocol gets test results of 77.68 Mbps. While testing the video stream delay, jitter video stream, and video stream throughput, the LACP protocol is 2.2%, 23%, and 0.05% better than the PAgP protocol.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信