“M”山开采计划与开采实现储量吨位对比分析

Djamaluddin Djamaluddin, Mulhadramy Mulhadramy, N. Jafar
{"title":"“M”山开采计划与开采实现储量吨位对比分析","authors":"Djamaluddin Djamaluddin, Mulhadramy Mulhadramy, N. Jafar","doi":"10.58227/jge.v1i1.6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In mining activities, there is often a discrepancy between the plan and actual conditions in the field; if not identified early, this discrepancy will undoubtedly have the potential to cause losses if it continues to repeat itself. This study aimed to determine the factors driving the difference between the mine plan and mining realization. This research uses Pit design data, mine progress measurement data, material movement data, and two mine plan data, namely the backup plan model resulting from detailed exploration and the backup plan model data from the input drill results. From the results of the mine plan research, the closest to realization is the plan using input drill data with an average material movement difference of 10% and the difference in mined ore reserves an average of 12%. In comparison, detailed exploration data with an intermediate material movement difference of 12% to 42% and the contrast in mined ore reserves is 52% on average. The presence of overcuts influences this and the use of different densities.","PeriodicalId":446458,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Geology and Exploration","volume":"220 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparative Analysis of Mined Reserve Tonnage on \\\"M\\\" Hill Between Mine Plan and Mining Realization\",\"authors\":\"Djamaluddin Djamaluddin, Mulhadramy Mulhadramy, N. Jafar\",\"doi\":\"10.58227/jge.v1i1.6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In mining activities, there is often a discrepancy between the plan and actual conditions in the field; if not identified early, this discrepancy will undoubtedly have the potential to cause losses if it continues to repeat itself. This study aimed to determine the factors driving the difference between the mine plan and mining realization. This research uses Pit design data, mine progress measurement data, material movement data, and two mine plan data, namely the backup plan model resulting from detailed exploration and the backup plan model data from the input drill results. From the results of the mine plan research, the closest to realization is the plan using input drill data with an average material movement difference of 10% and the difference in mined ore reserves an average of 12%. In comparison, detailed exploration data with an intermediate material movement difference of 12% to 42% and the contrast in mined ore reserves is 52% on average. The presence of overcuts influences this and the use of different densities.\",\"PeriodicalId\":446458,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Geology and Exploration\",\"volume\":\"220 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Geology and Exploration\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.58227/jge.v1i1.6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Geology and Exploration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.58227/jge.v1i1.6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在采矿活动中,计划和实地的实际情况之间往往有出入;如果不及早发现,这种差异如果继续重复,无疑将有可能造成损失。本研究旨在确定影响矿山规划与矿山实现差异的因素。本研究使用了基坑设计数据、矿山进度测量数据、物料移动数据和两个矿山方案数据,即详细勘探得出的后备方案模型和输入钻孔结果得出的后备方案模型数据。从矿山方案研究的结果来看,最接近实现的方案是使用输入钻孔数据的方案,平均物料移动差值为10%,开采矿储量差值平均为12%。相比之下,详细勘探数据中间物质移动差值为12% ~ 42%,已开采矿石储量对比平均为52%。过切的存在影响了这一点,也影响了不同密度的使用。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparative Analysis of Mined Reserve Tonnage on "M" Hill Between Mine Plan and Mining Realization
In mining activities, there is often a discrepancy between the plan and actual conditions in the field; if not identified early, this discrepancy will undoubtedly have the potential to cause losses if it continues to repeat itself. This study aimed to determine the factors driving the difference between the mine plan and mining realization. This research uses Pit design data, mine progress measurement data, material movement data, and two mine plan data, namely the backup plan model resulting from detailed exploration and the backup plan model data from the input drill results. From the results of the mine plan research, the closest to realization is the plan using input drill data with an average material movement difference of 10% and the difference in mined ore reserves an average of 12%. In comparison, detailed exploration data with an intermediate material movement difference of 12% to 42% and the contrast in mined ore reserves is 52% on average. The presence of overcuts influences this and the use of different densities.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信