非银行贷款和信贷周期性

Quirin Fleckenstein, M. Gopal, German Gutierrez Gallardo, Sebastian Hillenbrand
{"title":"非银行贷款和信贷周期性","authors":"Quirin Fleckenstein, M. Gopal, German Gutierrez Gallardo, Sebastian Hillenbrand","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3629232","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We document three new facts about nonbank lending in the syndicated loan market. First, lending by nonbanks is about three times as cyclical as lending by banks, even after controlling for borrower demand and loan characteristics. Second, the cyclicality of nonbanks - as opposed to bank health - explains the majority of the decline in originations during both the Great Recession and the COVID-19 crisis. Third, we study the main nonbank investors in the market - CLOs and loan mutual funds. Cyclicality in flows to these institutional investors explains cyclicality in nonbank lending. We provide evidence that time-series variation in the benefit from securitization (i.e., the \"CLO arbitrage\") and fragility in loan mutual fund redemptions contribute to the cyclicality of nonbanks.","PeriodicalId":123550,"journal":{"name":"Financial Crises eJournal","volume":"3 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Nonbank Lending and Credit Cyclicality\",\"authors\":\"Quirin Fleckenstein, M. Gopal, German Gutierrez Gallardo, Sebastian Hillenbrand\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3629232\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We document three new facts about nonbank lending in the syndicated loan market. First, lending by nonbanks is about three times as cyclical as lending by banks, even after controlling for borrower demand and loan characteristics. Second, the cyclicality of nonbanks - as opposed to bank health - explains the majority of the decline in originations during both the Great Recession and the COVID-19 crisis. Third, we study the main nonbank investors in the market - CLOs and loan mutual funds. Cyclicality in flows to these institutional investors explains cyclicality in nonbank lending. We provide evidence that time-series variation in the benefit from securitization (i.e., the \\\"CLO arbitrage\\\") and fragility in loan mutual fund redemptions contribute to the cyclicality of nonbanks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Financial Crises eJournal\",\"volume\":\"3 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Financial Crises eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3629232\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Crises eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3629232","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

我们记录了三个关于银团贷款市场非银行贷款的新事实。首先,非银行机构贷款的周期性是银行贷款的三倍左右,即使在控制了借款人需求和贷款特征之后也是如此。其次,非银行机构的周期性——而不是银行的健康状况——解释了大衰退和新冠肺炎危机期间贷款发放减少的主要原因。第三,我们研究了市场上主要的非银行投资者- clo和贷款共同基金。流向这些机构投资者的资金的周期性解释了非银行贷款的周期性。我们提供的证据表明,证券化(即“CLO套利”)收益的时间序列变化和贷款共同基金赎回的脆弱性有助于非银行机构的周期性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Nonbank Lending and Credit Cyclicality
We document three new facts about nonbank lending in the syndicated loan market. First, lending by nonbanks is about three times as cyclical as lending by banks, even after controlling for borrower demand and loan characteristics. Second, the cyclicality of nonbanks - as opposed to bank health - explains the majority of the decline in originations during both the Great Recession and the COVID-19 crisis. Third, we study the main nonbank investors in the market - CLOs and loan mutual funds. Cyclicality in flows to these institutional investors explains cyclicality in nonbank lending. We provide evidence that time-series variation in the benefit from securitization (i.e., the "CLO arbitrage") and fragility in loan mutual fund redemptions contribute to the cyclicality of nonbanks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信