了解并建立在学生所知的基础上:乘法思维的案例

D. Siemon
{"title":"了解并建立在学生所知的基础上:乘法思维的案例","authors":"D. Siemon","doi":"10.1163/9789004396449_001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Identifying and building on what students know in relation to important mathematics is widely regarded as essential to success in school mathematics. However, determining what is important and identifying what students actually understand in relation to what is deemed to be important are by no means uncontested or straightforward endeavours. In recent years attention has turned to the development of evidenced-based learning trajectories (or progressions) as a means of identifying what mathematics is important and how it is understood over time. But for this information to be useful to practitioners, it needs to be accompanied by accurate forms of assessment that locate where learners are in their learning journey and evidenced-based advice about where to go to next. This chapter traces the origins of the Scaffolding Numeracy in the Middle Years (SNMY) research project that used rich assessment tasks and Rasch analysis techniques to develop an evidence-based framework to support the teaching and learning of multiplicative thinking in Years (Grades) 4 to 9.","PeriodicalId":326610,"journal":{"name":"Researching and Using Progressions (Trajectories) in Mathematics Education","volume":"37 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-01-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Knowing and Building on What Students Know: The Case of Multiplicative Thinking\",\"authors\":\"D. Siemon\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/9789004396449_001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Identifying and building on what students know in relation to important mathematics is widely regarded as essential to success in school mathematics. However, determining what is important and identifying what students actually understand in relation to what is deemed to be important are by no means uncontested or straightforward endeavours. In recent years attention has turned to the development of evidenced-based learning trajectories (or progressions) as a means of identifying what mathematics is important and how it is understood over time. But for this information to be useful to practitioners, it needs to be accompanied by accurate forms of assessment that locate where learners are in their learning journey and evidenced-based advice about where to go to next. This chapter traces the origins of the Scaffolding Numeracy in the Middle Years (SNMY) research project that used rich assessment tasks and Rasch analysis techniques to develop an evidence-based framework to support the teaching and learning of multiplicative thinking in Years (Grades) 4 to 9.\",\"PeriodicalId\":326610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Researching and Using Progressions (Trajectories) in Mathematics Education\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-01-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Researching and Using Progressions (Trajectories) in Mathematics Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004396449_001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Researching and Using Progressions (Trajectories) in Mathematics Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004396449_001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

识别和建立学生所知道的与重要数学相关的知识被广泛认为是在学校数学中取得成功的关键。然而,确定什么是重要的,以及确定学生实际理解的内容与被认为重要的内容之间的关系,绝不是没有争议或直截了当的努力。近年来,人们的注意力转向了以证据为基础的学习轨迹(或进展)的发展,作为一种确定什么数学是重要的以及随着时间的推移如何理解数学的手段。但是,为了使这些信息对从业者有用,它需要伴随着准确的评估形式,以确定学习者在他们的学习过程中所处的位置,并提供关于下一步该去哪里的基于证据的建议。本章追溯了中学数学脚手架(SNMY)研究项目的起源,该项目使用丰富的评估任务和Rasch分析技术来开发一个基于证据的框架,以支持4至9年级乘法思维的教与学。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Knowing and Building on What Students Know: The Case of Multiplicative Thinking
Identifying and building on what students know in relation to important mathematics is widely regarded as essential to success in school mathematics. However, determining what is important and identifying what students actually understand in relation to what is deemed to be important are by no means uncontested or straightforward endeavours. In recent years attention has turned to the development of evidenced-based learning trajectories (or progressions) as a means of identifying what mathematics is important and how it is understood over time. But for this information to be useful to practitioners, it needs to be accompanied by accurate forms of assessment that locate where learners are in their learning journey and evidenced-based advice about where to go to next. This chapter traces the origins of the Scaffolding Numeracy in the Middle Years (SNMY) research project that used rich assessment tasks and Rasch analysis techniques to develop an evidence-based framework to support the teaching and learning of multiplicative thinking in Years (Grades) 4 to 9.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信