酒,不是普通商品:税收政策对泰国的影响

Pongsak Hoontrakul, Bunchon Songsumphan
{"title":"酒,不是普通商品:税收政策对泰国的影响","authors":"Pongsak Hoontrakul, Bunchon Songsumphan","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.1485238","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Alcohol is no ordinary commodity. Millions of people enjoy it safely if drinking in moderation. Alcoholic beverages are big business that creates substantial jobs, pay huge tax and contribute to our economy. But if consume excessively and regularly, alcohol is addictive substance that can cause brain disease beyond a reasonable doubt. Despite a chronic, potentially relapsing disorder and dependence bio-behavior, alcohol is widely distributed and consumed until Thailand has become the world’s fifth largest alcohol consumption per capita behind Russia and UK. Brewery, distilled and winery beverage industry or alike is in the business of delivering alcohol. Because alcohol is a practically drug-like chemical goods and its industry is natural oligopolistic, simple business concept and free market approach are not applicable for national policy making consideration. When this market fails to correct negative externality generating from alcohol, the government is justified to intervene, regulate and tax to redistribute for welfare enhancement. We examine how tax structure based on obsolete assumptions has de-merit incentive for Thai people to drink cheap beverage with high alcohol content that is addictive and chronically harmful to public health. Potential tax leakages with estimated over THB 30bn per annum were also discussed. To improve social welfare, we recommend on how to narrow fiscal gap - with little or no tax rate hike. To amend specific or alcoholic tax rate ceiling is the first best solution, while synthetic volume tax rate is presented as second best with only ministerial directive. A more equitable and more simplified tax regime is needed. Public health concern, social cost, fiscal budget rational and political economic perspectives are among fine issues that need to be addressed comprehensively. Other administrative tax based measures using information technology should be utilized for differential measures - to effectively increase social welfare as well.","PeriodicalId":175783,"journal":{"name":"Food Law & Policy eJournal","volume":"C-26 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2009-10-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Alcohol, No Ordinary Commodity: Tax Policy Implications for Thailand\",\"authors\":\"Pongsak Hoontrakul, Bunchon Songsumphan\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.1485238\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Alcohol is no ordinary commodity. Millions of people enjoy it safely if drinking in moderation. Alcoholic beverages are big business that creates substantial jobs, pay huge tax and contribute to our economy. But if consume excessively and regularly, alcohol is addictive substance that can cause brain disease beyond a reasonable doubt. Despite a chronic, potentially relapsing disorder and dependence bio-behavior, alcohol is widely distributed and consumed until Thailand has become the world’s fifth largest alcohol consumption per capita behind Russia and UK. Brewery, distilled and winery beverage industry or alike is in the business of delivering alcohol. Because alcohol is a practically drug-like chemical goods and its industry is natural oligopolistic, simple business concept and free market approach are not applicable for national policy making consideration. When this market fails to correct negative externality generating from alcohol, the government is justified to intervene, regulate and tax to redistribute for welfare enhancement. We examine how tax structure based on obsolete assumptions has de-merit incentive for Thai people to drink cheap beverage with high alcohol content that is addictive and chronically harmful to public health. Potential tax leakages with estimated over THB 30bn per annum were also discussed. To improve social welfare, we recommend on how to narrow fiscal gap - with little or no tax rate hike. To amend specific or alcoholic tax rate ceiling is the first best solution, while synthetic volume tax rate is presented as second best with only ministerial directive. A more equitable and more simplified tax regime is needed. Public health concern, social cost, fiscal budget rational and political economic perspectives are among fine issues that need to be addressed comprehensively. Other administrative tax based measures using information technology should be utilized for differential measures - to effectively increase social welfare as well.\",\"PeriodicalId\":175783,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Food Law & Policy eJournal\",\"volume\":\"C-26 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2009-10-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Food Law & Policy eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1485238\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Food Law & Policy eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1485238","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

酒不是普通商品。数百万人只要适量饮用,就能安全地享用它。酒精饮料是一项大生意,它创造了大量的就业机会,缴纳了巨额税收,为我们的经济做出了贡献。但如果过度和经常饮酒,酒精是一种令人上瘾的物质,毫无疑问会导致脑部疾病。尽管酒精是一种慢性的、可能复发的疾病和依赖性的生物行为,但它在泰国广泛分布和消费,直到泰国成为仅次于俄罗斯和英国的世界第五大人均酒精消费量。酿酒厂、蒸馏酒和酿酒厂等饮料行业都从事提供酒精的业务。由于酒精实际上是一种类似毒品的化学产品,而且其行业是天然的寡头垄断,简单的商业理念和自由市场方法不适用于国家决策考虑。当这个市场无法纠正酒精产生的负外部性时,政府就有理由进行干预、监管和征税,以实现福利的再分配。我们研究了基于过时假设的税收结构如何对泰国人饮用具有成瘾性和长期危害公共健康的高酒精含量廉价饮料产生不利激励。他们还讨论了潜在的税收泄漏,估计每年超过300亿泰铢。为了改善社会福利,我们建议如何在很少或不提高税率的情况下缩小财政差距。修改特定税率或酒类税率上限是第一种最佳解决方案,而综合数量税率是第二种最佳解决方案,只有部长指示。我们需要一个更公平、更简化的税收制度。公共卫生问题、社会成本、财政预算理性和政治经济观点是需要全面解决的诸多问题之一。为了有效地提高社会福利,应该利用信息技术的其他行政税收措施。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Alcohol, No Ordinary Commodity: Tax Policy Implications for Thailand
Alcohol is no ordinary commodity. Millions of people enjoy it safely if drinking in moderation. Alcoholic beverages are big business that creates substantial jobs, pay huge tax and contribute to our economy. But if consume excessively and regularly, alcohol is addictive substance that can cause brain disease beyond a reasonable doubt. Despite a chronic, potentially relapsing disorder and dependence bio-behavior, alcohol is widely distributed and consumed until Thailand has become the world’s fifth largest alcohol consumption per capita behind Russia and UK. Brewery, distilled and winery beverage industry or alike is in the business of delivering alcohol. Because alcohol is a practically drug-like chemical goods and its industry is natural oligopolistic, simple business concept and free market approach are not applicable for national policy making consideration. When this market fails to correct negative externality generating from alcohol, the government is justified to intervene, regulate and tax to redistribute for welfare enhancement. We examine how tax structure based on obsolete assumptions has de-merit incentive for Thai people to drink cheap beverage with high alcohol content that is addictive and chronically harmful to public health. Potential tax leakages with estimated over THB 30bn per annum were also discussed. To improve social welfare, we recommend on how to narrow fiscal gap - with little or no tax rate hike. To amend specific or alcoholic tax rate ceiling is the first best solution, while synthetic volume tax rate is presented as second best with only ministerial directive. A more equitable and more simplified tax regime is needed. Public health concern, social cost, fiscal budget rational and political economic perspectives are among fine issues that need to be addressed comprehensively. Other administrative tax based measures using information technology should be utilized for differential measures - to effectively increase social welfare as well.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信