在v. А的论文中王公时代砖的特征。BOGUSEVYCH

O. О. Makhota
{"title":"在v. А的论文中王公时代砖的特征。BOGUSEVYCH","authors":"O. О. Makhota","doi":"10.37445/adiu.2022.02.03","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Volodymyr Bogusevych researched various monuments of archeology, art and architecture of the IX—XVII centuries. He can be attributed to the constellation of scholars who laid the necessary vectors for studying the laws of architecture of the Princely Age. The methods of architectural and archeological research developed by V. Bogusevych still helps scholars to study the monuments of stone architecture. \n \nBogusevych made a significant contribution to the study of one of the main structural material of the palace and temple architecture — the plinth. Having started his academic path in this direction along with the most famous experts in plinth (M. Karger, P. Rappaport and M. Kholostenko), he developed his own method of dating bricks of the Princely Age. However, V. Bogusevych did not pay proper attention to the coverage of the signs by which he dated the plinth. Judging by the works of V. Bogusevych, most likely it was its size. Also there is a tendency in his works to date the bricks by presence of marks and end marks. He collected a large collection of branded plinths from Kyiv, Chernihiv, Ostra and Putivl and has repeatedly participated in discussions about the possible purpose of the signs. \n \nAnalyzing the works of V. Bogusevych, we can conclude that he developed his terminological and conceptual apparatus in the study of plinth gradually. It was not until the 1950s that in his papers the word «plinth» appeared next to the word «brick» to denote this type of building material. This was influenced by joint work with professional architects Yu. Aseev and M. Kholostenko. After all, it is in joint work with them that the use of these terms can be traced. \nOf course, modern research methods have advanced significantly in the study of plinths and sometimes refute the conclusions of the scholar. But the source base of brick sizes and signs on it significantly influenced the development of modern methods of attribution of plinths and is an extremely valuable source for future generations of researchers of bricks of the Princely Age.","PeriodicalId":406948,"journal":{"name":"Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CHARACTERISTICS OF THE BRICK OF THE PRINCELY AGE IN THE PAPERS OF V. А. BOGUSEVYCH\",\"authors\":\"O. О. Makhota\",\"doi\":\"10.37445/adiu.2022.02.03\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Volodymyr Bogusevych researched various monuments of archeology, art and architecture of the IX—XVII centuries. He can be attributed to the constellation of scholars who laid the necessary vectors for studying the laws of architecture of the Princely Age. The methods of architectural and archeological research developed by V. Bogusevych still helps scholars to study the monuments of stone architecture. \\n \\nBogusevych made a significant contribution to the study of one of the main structural material of the palace and temple architecture — the plinth. Having started his academic path in this direction along with the most famous experts in plinth (M. Karger, P. Rappaport and M. Kholostenko), he developed his own method of dating bricks of the Princely Age. However, V. Bogusevych did not pay proper attention to the coverage of the signs by which he dated the plinth. Judging by the works of V. Bogusevych, most likely it was its size. Also there is a tendency in his works to date the bricks by presence of marks and end marks. He collected a large collection of branded plinths from Kyiv, Chernihiv, Ostra and Putivl and has repeatedly participated in discussions about the possible purpose of the signs. \\n \\nAnalyzing the works of V. Bogusevych, we can conclude that he developed his terminological and conceptual apparatus in the study of plinth gradually. It was not until the 1950s that in his papers the word «plinth» appeared next to the word «brick» to denote this type of building material. This was influenced by joint work with professional architects Yu. Aseev and M. Kholostenko. After all, it is in joint work with them that the use of these terms can be traced. \\nOf course, modern research methods have advanced significantly in the study of plinths and sometimes refute the conclusions of the scholar. But the source base of brick sizes and signs on it significantly influenced the development of modern methods of attribution of plinths and is an extremely valuable source for future generations of researchers of bricks of the Princely Age.\",\"PeriodicalId\":406948,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2022.02.03\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archaeology and Early History of Ukraine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37445/adiu.2022.02.03","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

Volodymyr Bogusevych研究了9 - 17世纪的各种考古、艺术和建筑古迹。他可以归功于一群学者,他们为研究王侯时代的建筑规律奠定了必要的载体。V. Bogusevych开发的建筑和考古研究方法仍然有助于学者研究石头建筑的纪念碑。Bogusevych对宫殿和寺庙建筑的主要结构材料之一——基座的研究做出了重大贡献。在与最著名的地基专家(M. Karger, P. Rappaport和M. Kholostenko)一起开始了他的学术道路后,他发展了自己的方法来确定王子时代砖块的年代。然而,V. Bogusevych没有适当注意到他用来确定基座日期的标志的覆盖范围。从V. Bogusevych的作品来看,最有可能是它的大小。此外,在他的作品中,有一种倾向是通过标记和末端标记来确定砖块的年代。他从基辅、切尔尼耶夫、奥斯特拉和普提尔收集了大量的品牌底座,并多次参与关于这些标志可能目的的讨论。通过分析波古塞维奇的著作,我们可以得出结论,他在基础研究中逐渐形成了自己的术语和概念工具。直到20世纪50年代,在他的论文中,“基座”一词才出现在“砖”一词的旁边,以表示这种建筑材料。这是受与专业建筑师Yu合作的影响。Aseev和Kholostenko先生。毕竟,这些术语的使用是在与他们的共同工作中可以追踪到的。当然,现代研究方法在对地基的研究上有了很大的进步,有时也会反驳学者的结论。但是,砖的尺寸和标志的来源基础显著影响了现代基础归属方法的发展,对未来几代王公时代砖的研究人员来说是一个极有价值的来源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CHARACTERISTICS OF THE BRICK OF THE PRINCELY AGE IN THE PAPERS OF V. А. BOGUSEVYCH
Volodymyr Bogusevych researched various monuments of archeology, art and architecture of the IX—XVII centuries. He can be attributed to the constellation of scholars who laid the necessary vectors for studying the laws of architecture of the Princely Age. The methods of architectural and archeological research developed by V. Bogusevych still helps scholars to study the monuments of stone architecture. Bogusevych made a significant contribution to the study of one of the main structural material of the palace and temple architecture — the plinth. Having started his academic path in this direction along with the most famous experts in plinth (M. Karger, P. Rappaport and M. Kholostenko), he developed his own method of dating bricks of the Princely Age. However, V. Bogusevych did not pay proper attention to the coverage of the signs by which he dated the plinth. Judging by the works of V. Bogusevych, most likely it was its size. Also there is a tendency in his works to date the bricks by presence of marks and end marks. He collected a large collection of branded plinths from Kyiv, Chernihiv, Ostra and Putivl and has repeatedly participated in discussions about the possible purpose of the signs. Analyzing the works of V. Bogusevych, we can conclude that he developed his terminological and conceptual apparatus in the study of plinth gradually. It was not until the 1950s that in his papers the word «plinth» appeared next to the word «brick» to denote this type of building material. This was influenced by joint work with professional architects Yu. Aseev and M. Kholostenko. After all, it is in joint work with them that the use of these terms can be traced. Of course, modern research methods have advanced significantly in the study of plinths and sometimes refute the conclusions of the scholar. But the source base of brick sizes and signs on it significantly influenced the development of modern methods of attribution of plinths and is an extremely valuable source for future generations of researchers of bricks of the Princely Age.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信