欧盟繁琐的投资法律和政策及其对知识产权保护的影响

Szilárd Gáspár Szilágyi
{"title":"欧盟繁琐的投资法律和政策及其对知识产权保护的影响","authors":"Szilárd Gáspár Szilágyi","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3527597","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The extension of the EU’s exclusive competences over foreign direct investment, instead of being a smooth operation meant to streamline the investment policies of the Member States into one common EU investment policy, has turned into an arduous process of legal and political hurdles. The purpose of this Chapter is to explain the ways in which the EU’s cumbersome investment law and policy can affect the protection of the Intellectual Property (IP) rights of EU investors abroad, by focusing on the following core issues: (a) the fate of Member State bilateral investment treaties (BITs) with third countries following the Lisbon amendments; (b) the conclusion of new EU trade and investment agreements; (c) the compatibility of intra-EU BITs with EU Law; and (d) the compatibility between the Investment Court System and investment tribunals under Member State BITs with third countries and EU law.","PeriodicalId":378416,"journal":{"name":"International Economic Law eJournal","volume":"36 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The EU’s Cumbersome Investment Law and Policy, and Its Effects on the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights\",\"authors\":\"Szilárd Gáspár Szilágyi\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3527597\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The extension of the EU’s exclusive competences over foreign direct investment, instead of being a smooth operation meant to streamline the investment policies of the Member States into one common EU investment policy, has turned into an arduous process of legal and political hurdles. The purpose of this Chapter is to explain the ways in which the EU’s cumbersome investment law and policy can affect the protection of the Intellectual Property (IP) rights of EU investors abroad, by focusing on the following core issues: (a) the fate of Member State bilateral investment treaties (BITs) with third countries following the Lisbon amendments; (b) the conclusion of new EU trade and investment agreements; (c) the compatibility of intra-EU BITs with EU Law; and (d) the compatibility between the Investment Court System and investment tribunals under Member State BITs with third countries and EU law.\",\"PeriodicalId\":378416,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Economic Law eJournal\",\"volume\":\"36 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Economic Law eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3527597\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Economic Law eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3527597","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

扩大欧盟对外国直接投资的专属权限,本应是将成员国投资政策精简为欧盟共同投资政策的顺利操作,但却变成了一个充满法律和政治障碍的艰巨过程。本章的目的是解释欧盟繁琐的投资法律和政策如何影响欧盟海外投资者的知识产权保护,重点关注以下核心问题:(a)里斯本修正案后成员国与第三国双边投资条约(BITs)的命运;(b)缔结新的欧盟贸易和投资协定;(c)欧盟内部双边投资协定与欧盟法律的兼容性;(d)成员国双边投资协定下的投资法院系统和投资法庭与第三国和欧盟法律之间的兼容性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The EU’s Cumbersome Investment Law and Policy, and Its Effects on the Protection of Intellectual Property Rights
The extension of the EU’s exclusive competences over foreign direct investment, instead of being a smooth operation meant to streamline the investment policies of the Member States into one common EU investment policy, has turned into an arduous process of legal and political hurdles. The purpose of this Chapter is to explain the ways in which the EU’s cumbersome investment law and policy can affect the protection of the Intellectual Property (IP) rights of EU investors abroad, by focusing on the following core issues: (a) the fate of Member State bilateral investment treaties (BITs) with third countries following the Lisbon amendments; (b) the conclusion of new EU trade and investment agreements; (c) the compatibility of intra-EU BITs with EU Law; and (d) the compatibility between the Investment Court System and investment tribunals under Member State BITs with third countries and EU law.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信