考虑多重共线性和语义相似度的答案表述客观分数估计改进

Yuya Yokoyama, T. Hochin, Hiroki Nomiya
{"title":"考虑多重共线性和语义相似度的答案表述客观分数估计改进","authors":"Yuya Yokoyama, T. Hochin, Hiroki Nomiya","doi":"10.1109/CSII.2018.00036","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To eliminate mismatches between the intentions of questioners and respondents of Question and Answer (Q&A) sites, we have clarified that the impression of the statements could be captured by nine factors, and the factor scores could be estimated from the feature values of the statements. Objective scores of the statements could be estimated fairly good, and that those of subjective statements could be estimated well by taking the natural logarithm of the factor scores with the consideration of cross-validation. With the consideration of semantic similarity between Q&A, semantic similarity could be effective in estimating objective scores in the previous preliminary analysis. This paper tries to perform multiple regression analysis with the consideration of multicollinearity between feature values of semantic similarity with those other than semantic similarity. As a result of analysis, feature values of semantic similarity was obtained as a part of regression formula in 8 out of 15 trials. With the consideration of semantic similarity, average estimation error becomes smaller for three categories.","PeriodicalId":202365,"journal":{"name":"2018 5th International Conference on Computational Science/ Intelligence and Applied Informatics (CSII)","volume":"18 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimation Improvement of Objective Scores of Answer Statements with Consideration of Multicollinearity and Semantic Similarity\",\"authors\":\"Yuya Yokoyama, T. Hochin, Hiroki Nomiya\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/CSII.2018.00036\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To eliminate mismatches between the intentions of questioners and respondents of Question and Answer (Q&A) sites, we have clarified that the impression of the statements could be captured by nine factors, and the factor scores could be estimated from the feature values of the statements. Objective scores of the statements could be estimated fairly good, and that those of subjective statements could be estimated well by taking the natural logarithm of the factor scores with the consideration of cross-validation. With the consideration of semantic similarity between Q&A, semantic similarity could be effective in estimating objective scores in the previous preliminary analysis. This paper tries to perform multiple regression analysis with the consideration of multicollinearity between feature values of semantic similarity with those other than semantic similarity. As a result of analysis, feature values of semantic similarity was obtained as a part of regression formula in 8 out of 15 trials. With the consideration of semantic similarity, average estimation error becomes smaller for three categories.\",\"PeriodicalId\":202365,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2018 5th International Conference on Computational Science/ Intelligence and Applied Informatics (CSII)\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2018 5th International Conference on Computational Science/ Intelligence and Applied Informatics (CSII)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSII.2018.00036\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2018 5th International Conference on Computational Science/ Intelligence and Applied Informatics (CSII)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/CSII.2018.00036","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了消除问答(Q&A)网站提问者和被调查者意图之间的不匹配,我们澄清了陈述的印象可以被九个因素捕获,并且可以从陈述的特征值估计因子得分。对各因子得分取自然对数并考虑交叉验证,可以较好地估计各因子得分的客观得分,较好地估计各因子得分的主观得分。考虑到问答之间的语义相似度,在前面的初步分析中,语义相似度可以有效地估计客观得分。本文尝试考虑语义相似度特征值与非语义相似度特征值之间的多重共线性进行多元回归分析。经过分析,15次试验中有8次得到了语义相似度的特征值作为回归公式的一部分。在考虑语义相似度的情况下,三种分类的平均估计误差变小。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Estimation Improvement of Objective Scores of Answer Statements with Consideration of Multicollinearity and Semantic Similarity
To eliminate mismatches between the intentions of questioners and respondents of Question and Answer (Q&A) sites, we have clarified that the impression of the statements could be captured by nine factors, and the factor scores could be estimated from the feature values of the statements. Objective scores of the statements could be estimated fairly good, and that those of subjective statements could be estimated well by taking the natural logarithm of the factor scores with the consideration of cross-validation. With the consideration of semantic similarity between Q&A, semantic similarity could be effective in estimating objective scores in the previous preliminary analysis. This paper tries to perform multiple regression analysis with the consideration of multicollinearity between feature values of semantic similarity with those other than semantic similarity. As a result of analysis, feature values of semantic similarity was obtained as a part of regression formula in 8 out of 15 trials. With the consideration of semantic similarity, average estimation error becomes smaller for three categories.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信