引入科学方法解释圣经:基督教文献的定量分析

H. Murai
{"title":"引入科学方法解释圣经:基督教文献的定量分析","authors":"H. Murai","doi":"10.1109/SNPD.2012.18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Systematic thought (such as Christian theology) has primarily been investigated using literature-based approaches, with texts that are usually more abstract and subjective in nature than scientific papers. However, as systematic ideas and thought influence all areas of human activity and thinking, the application of scientific methodologies such as bibliometrics, NLP (Natural Language Processing), and other information technologies may provide a more objective understanding of systematic thought. This paper introduces four methods of quantitative analysis for interpretation of the Bible in a scientific manner. The methods are citation analysis for interpreter's texts, vocabulary analysis for translations, variant text analysis for canonical texts, and evaluation method for rhetorical structure.","PeriodicalId":387936,"journal":{"name":"2012 13th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2012-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Introducing Scientific Methods for the Interpretation of the Bible: Quantitative Analysis of Christian Documents\",\"authors\":\"H. Murai\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/SNPD.2012.18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Systematic thought (such as Christian theology) has primarily been investigated using literature-based approaches, with texts that are usually more abstract and subjective in nature than scientific papers. However, as systematic ideas and thought influence all areas of human activity and thinking, the application of scientific methodologies such as bibliometrics, NLP (Natural Language Processing), and other information technologies may provide a more objective understanding of systematic thought. This paper introduces four methods of quantitative analysis for interpretation of the Bible in a scientific manner. The methods are citation analysis for interpreter's texts, vocabulary analysis for translations, variant text analysis for canonical texts, and evaluation method for rhetorical structure.\",\"PeriodicalId\":387936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2012 13th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2012-08-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2012 13th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/SNPD.2012.18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2012 13th ACIS International Conference on Software Engineering, Artificial Intelligence, Networking and Parallel/Distributed Computing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/SNPD.2012.18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

系统思想(如基督教神学)主要是用基于文献的方法来研究的,这些文献通常比科学论文更抽象、更主观。然而,由于系统思想和思想影响着人类活动和思维的所有领域,应用科学方法,如文献计量学、NLP(自然语言处理)和其他信息技术,可能会提供对系统思想更客观的理解。本文介绍了科学解释圣经的四种定量分析方法。这些方法包括对译员文本的引用分析、对译文的词汇分析、对规范文本的变体语篇分析和对修辞结构的评价方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Introducing Scientific Methods for the Interpretation of the Bible: Quantitative Analysis of Christian Documents
Systematic thought (such as Christian theology) has primarily been investigated using literature-based approaches, with texts that are usually more abstract and subjective in nature than scientific papers. However, as systematic ideas and thought influence all areas of human activity and thinking, the application of scientific methodologies such as bibliometrics, NLP (Natural Language Processing), and other information technologies may provide a more objective understanding of systematic thought. This paper introduces four methods of quantitative analysis for interpretation of the Bible in a scientific manner. The methods are citation analysis for interpreter's texts, vocabulary analysis for translations, variant text analysis for canonical texts, and evaluation method for rhetorical structure.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信