CoCo债券与系统性风险

J. Fajardo, L. Mendes
{"title":"CoCo债券与系统性风险","authors":"J. Fajardo, L. Mendes","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3242736","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Issuing CoCo bonds is a possible way for banks to protect against economic uncertainty scenario. However, it remains unclear if CoCo bonds will be useful in loss absorption for issuers in the event of another financial distress. Using the model of Systemic Risk proposed by Brownlees and Engle (2016a), we estimated the expected capital shortfall for 103 banks that issue the CoCo bonds. The results show that CoCo can avoid the collapse of 6 institutions in the short term. Also, we design an event study that determines how the announce and the issue of CoCo bonds influence the systemic risk. The results show that the first issue can be interpreted for the market as a positive signal since the SRISK decrease. On the other hand, the SRISK increase when banks issue the second, thus this may reflect the investor’s fear of seeing the bank taking more capital.","PeriodicalId":123550,"journal":{"name":"Financial Crises eJournal","volume":"165 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CoCo Bond and Systemic Risk\",\"authors\":\"J. Fajardo, L. Mendes\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3242736\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Issuing CoCo bonds is a possible way for banks to protect against economic uncertainty scenario. However, it remains unclear if CoCo bonds will be useful in loss absorption for issuers in the event of another financial distress. Using the model of Systemic Risk proposed by Brownlees and Engle (2016a), we estimated the expected capital shortfall for 103 banks that issue the CoCo bonds. The results show that CoCo can avoid the collapse of 6 institutions in the short term. Also, we design an event study that determines how the announce and the issue of CoCo bonds influence the systemic risk. The results show that the first issue can be interpreted for the market as a positive signal since the SRISK decrease. On the other hand, the SRISK increase when banks issue the second, thus this may reflect the investor’s fear of seeing the bank taking more capital.\",\"PeriodicalId\":123550,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Financial Crises eJournal\",\"volume\":\"165 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Financial Crises eJournal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3242736\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Financial Crises eJournal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3242736","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

发行CoCo债券是银行防范经济不确定性的一种可能方式。然而,目前尚不清楚的是,在再次出现财务困境的情况下,CoCo债券是否有助于发行人吸收损失。利用Brownlees和Engle (2016a)提出的系统风险模型,我们估计了103家发行CoCo债券的银行的预期资本缺口。结果表明,CoCo可以在短期内避免6家机构的倒闭。此外,我们设计了一个事件研究,以确定CoCo债券的公告和发行如何影响系统风险。结果表明,第一个问题可以被市场解释为一个积极的信号,因为SRISK下降。另一方面,当银行发行第二种债券时,SRISK会增加,因此这可能反映了投资者对银行吸收更多资本的恐惧。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CoCo Bond and Systemic Risk
Issuing CoCo bonds is a possible way for banks to protect against economic uncertainty scenario. However, it remains unclear if CoCo bonds will be useful in loss absorption for issuers in the event of another financial distress. Using the model of Systemic Risk proposed by Brownlees and Engle (2016a), we estimated the expected capital shortfall for 103 banks that issue the CoCo bonds. The results show that CoCo can avoid the collapse of 6 institutions in the short term. Also, we design an event study that determines how the announce and the issue of CoCo bonds influence the systemic risk. The results show that the first issue can be interpreted for the market as a positive signal since the SRISK decrease. On the other hand, the SRISK increase when banks issue the second, thus this may reflect the investor’s fear of seeing the bank taking more capital.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信