{"title":"简短声明:重复投球的限制很紧","authors":"Dimitrios Los, Thomas Sauerwald","doi":"10.1145/3490148.3538561","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"We study the repeated balls-into-bins process introduced by Becchetti, Clementi, Natale, Pasquale and Posta [3]. This process starts with m balls arbitrarily distributed across n bins. At each step t = 1, 2, . . ., we select one ball from each non-empty bin, and then place it into a bin chosen independently and uniformly at random. We prove the following results: For any n ⩽ m ⩽ poly(n), we prove a lower bound of Ω(m/n · logn) on the maximum load. For the special case m = n, this matches the upper bound of O (logn), as shown in [3]. It also provides a positive answer to the conjecture in [3] that for m = n the maximum load is ω(log n /log log n) in a polynomially large window. For m ∈ [ω (n), n logn], our new lower bound also disproves the conjecture in [3] that the maximum load remains O (logn). For any n ≤ m ≤ poly(n), we prove an upper bound of O (m/n · logn) on the maximum load for a polynomially large window, which matches our lower bound. For any m ≥ n, our analysis also implies an O (m2 /n) waiting time to a configuration with O (m/n . log m) maximum load, even for worst-case initial distributions. For m ≥ n, we show that every ball visits every bin in O (m log m) steps. For m = n, this improves the previous upper bound of O (n log2 n) in [3] and for any n ≤ m ≤ poly(n) this is tight up to multiplicative constants. Full version of the paper at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.12400.","PeriodicalId":112865,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 34th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures","volume":"24 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Brief Announcement: Tight Bounds for Repeated Balls-into-Bins\",\"authors\":\"Dimitrios Los, Thomas Sauerwald\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3490148.3538561\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"We study the repeated balls-into-bins process introduced by Becchetti, Clementi, Natale, Pasquale and Posta [3]. This process starts with m balls arbitrarily distributed across n bins. At each step t = 1, 2, . . ., we select one ball from each non-empty bin, and then place it into a bin chosen independently and uniformly at random. We prove the following results: For any n ⩽ m ⩽ poly(n), we prove a lower bound of Ω(m/n · logn) on the maximum load. For the special case m = n, this matches the upper bound of O (logn), as shown in [3]. It also provides a positive answer to the conjecture in [3] that for m = n the maximum load is ω(log n /log log n) in a polynomially large window. For m ∈ [ω (n), n logn], our new lower bound also disproves the conjecture in [3] that the maximum load remains O (logn). For any n ≤ m ≤ poly(n), we prove an upper bound of O (m/n · logn) on the maximum load for a polynomially large window, which matches our lower bound. For any m ≥ n, our analysis also implies an O (m2 /n) waiting time to a configuration with O (m/n . log m) maximum load, even for worst-case initial distributions. For m ≥ n, we show that every ball visits every bin in O (m log m) steps. For m = n, this improves the previous upper bound of O (n log2 n) in [3] and for any n ≤ m ≤ poly(n) this is tight up to multiplicative constants. Full version of the paper at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.12400.\",\"PeriodicalId\":112865,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 34th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures\",\"volume\":\"24 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 34th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3490148.3538561\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 34th ACM Symposium on Parallelism in Algorithms and Architectures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3490148.3538561","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Brief Announcement: Tight Bounds for Repeated Balls-into-Bins
We study the repeated balls-into-bins process introduced by Becchetti, Clementi, Natale, Pasquale and Posta [3]. This process starts with m balls arbitrarily distributed across n bins. At each step t = 1, 2, . . ., we select one ball from each non-empty bin, and then place it into a bin chosen independently and uniformly at random. We prove the following results: For any n ⩽ m ⩽ poly(n), we prove a lower bound of Ω(m/n · logn) on the maximum load. For the special case m = n, this matches the upper bound of O (logn), as shown in [3]. It also provides a positive answer to the conjecture in [3] that for m = n the maximum load is ω(log n /log log n) in a polynomially large window. For m ∈ [ω (n), n logn], our new lower bound also disproves the conjecture in [3] that the maximum load remains O (logn). For any n ≤ m ≤ poly(n), we prove an upper bound of O (m/n · logn) on the maximum load for a polynomially large window, which matches our lower bound. For any m ≥ n, our analysis also implies an O (m2 /n) waiting time to a configuration with O (m/n . log m) maximum load, even for worst-case initial distributions. For m ≥ n, we show that every ball visits every bin in O (m log m) steps. For m = n, this improves the previous upper bound of O (n log2 n) in [3] and for any n ≤ m ≤ poly(n) this is tight up to multiplicative constants. Full version of the paper at: https://arxiv.org/abs/2203.12400.