{"title":"法律与道德:哈特与富勒之争","authors":"B. Bakti, M. Tarigan","doi":"10.24815/sklj.v6i2.29123","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper aims to explain how the relationship between law and morality in the H.L Hart and Fuller debate. The relationship between law and morality in the development of legal science is inseparable from legal and morality debates. Legal positivism scientists place law and morals separately, while natural law scientists place law and morals as inseparable. In this case, the author tries to recall how the post-World War II conditions were shocked by the debate between British legal scientists and American legal scientists, namely H.L.A Hart and Lon Fuller.","PeriodicalId":142500,"journal":{"name":"Syiah Kuala Law Journal","volume":"60 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Law And Morality: The Hart And Fuller Debate\",\"authors\":\"B. Bakti, M. Tarigan\",\"doi\":\"10.24815/sklj.v6i2.29123\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper aims to explain how the relationship between law and morality in the H.L Hart and Fuller debate. The relationship between law and morality in the development of legal science is inseparable from legal and morality debates. Legal positivism scientists place law and morals separately, while natural law scientists place law and morals as inseparable. In this case, the author tries to recall how the post-World War II conditions were shocked by the debate between British legal scientists and American legal scientists, namely H.L.A Hart and Lon Fuller.\",\"PeriodicalId\":142500,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Syiah Kuala Law Journal\",\"volume\":\"60 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Syiah Kuala Law Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v6i2.29123\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Syiah Kuala Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v6i2.29123","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
This paper aims to explain how the relationship between law and morality in the H.L Hart and Fuller debate. The relationship between law and morality in the development of legal science is inseparable from legal and morality debates. Legal positivism scientists place law and morals separately, while natural law scientists place law and morals as inseparable. In this case, the author tries to recall how the post-World War II conditions were shocked by the debate between British legal scientists and American legal scientists, namely H.L.A Hart and Lon Fuller.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
