及时改变COVID-19危重疾病

U. Demir, V. G. Soylu, Ö. Taşkın, Ayşe Yılmaz
{"title":"及时改变COVID-19危重疾病","authors":"U. Demir, V. G. Soylu, Ö. Taşkın, Ayşe Yılmaz","doi":"10.51271/kmj-39","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background:: COVID-19 disease, which has taken over the world for more than a year, is unfortunately not yet understood and a definitive treatment has not been found. The aim of this study is to investigate the changes in clinical and laboratory tests of critical COVID-19 patients followed in the intensive care unit between March/2020 and December/2020 and to evaluate the factors that cause these changes with literature information. \nMaterıal and Method: In the study, during the beginning of the pandemic and its progress; 50 COVID-19 patients treated in the intensive care unit between March-April-May/2020 were defined as group 1, and 50 COVID-19 patients treated in the intensive care unit between October-November-December/2020 were defined as group 2.Clinical, laboratory and intensive care processes of the patients in the groups were analyzed retrospectively and compared. \nResults:Demographic data were similar between groups. Group 2 patients had higher 28-day mortality, and this result was statistically significant (p = 0.006). Transfer rates of group 1 patients to the service after intensive care were found to be statistically higher (p = 0.029). \nConclusıons:28-day mortality was found to be different between similar patient groups who were admitted to intensive care during different periods of the pandemic. The reasons for this may be: changes in pathogenicity as a result of viral mutations, different immune responses of hosts to viral infection, intensive care experience of healthcare professionals.","PeriodicalId":369732,"journal":{"name":"Kastamonu Medical Journal","volume":"74 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Change of critical COVID-19 disease in time\",\"authors\":\"U. Demir, V. G. Soylu, Ö. Taşkın, Ayşe Yılmaz\",\"doi\":\"10.51271/kmj-39\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background:: COVID-19 disease, which has taken over the world for more than a year, is unfortunately not yet understood and a definitive treatment has not been found. The aim of this study is to investigate the changes in clinical and laboratory tests of critical COVID-19 patients followed in the intensive care unit between March/2020 and December/2020 and to evaluate the factors that cause these changes with literature information. \\nMaterıal and Method: In the study, during the beginning of the pandemic and its progress; 50 COVID-19 patients treated in the intensive care unit between March-April-May/2020 were defined as group 1, and 50 COVID-19 patients treated in the intensive care unit between October-November-December/2020 were defined as group 2.Clinical, laboratory and intensive care processes of the patients in the groups were analyzed retrospectively and compared. \\nResults:Demographic data were similar between groups. Group 2 patients had higher 28-day mortality, and this result was statistically significant (p = 0.006). Transfer rates of group 1 patients to the service after intensive care were found to be statistically higher (p = 0.029). \\nConclusıons:28-day mortality was found to be different between similar patient groups who were admitted to intensive care during different periods of the pandemic. The reasons for this may be: changes in pathogenicity as a result of viral mutations, different immune responses of hosts to viral infection, intensive care experience of healthcare professionals.\",\"PeriodicalId\":369732,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kastamonu Medical Journal\",\"volume\":\"74 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kastamonu Medical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.51271/kmj-39\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kastamonu Medical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.51271/kmj-39","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:令人遗憾的是,人们对COVID-19疾病尚未了解,也尚未找到明确的治疗方法,该疾病已在全球肆虐一年多。本研究的目的是调查2020年3月至2020年12月重症监护病房随访的COVID-19危重患者临床和实验室检查的变化,并结合文献资料评估导致这些变化的因素。Materıal和方法:在研究中,在大流行开始期间及其进展;将2020年3月至4月至5月期间在重症监护病房治疗的50例COVID-19患者定义为1组,将2020年10月至11月至12月期间在重症监护病房治疗的50例COVID-19患者定义为2组。对两组患者的临床、实验室及重症监护过程进行回顾性分析和比较。结果:组间人口学数据相似。2组患者28天死亡率较高,差异有统计学意义(p = 0.006)。1组患者重症监护后转院率显著高于对照组(p = 0.029)。Conclusıons:发现在大流行的不同时期接受重症监护的类似患者群体之间的28天死亡率是不同的。其原因可能是:由于病毒突变导致致病性的变化,宿主对病毒感染的不同免疫反应,卫生保健专业人员的重症监护经验。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Change of critical COVID-19 disease in time
Background:: COVID-19 disease, which has taken over the world for more than a year, is unfortunately not yet understood and a definitive treatment has not been found. The aim of this study is to investigate the changes in clinical and laboratory tests of critical COVID-19 patients followed in the intensive care unit between March/2020 and December/2020 and to evaluate the factors that cause these changes with literature information. Materıal and Method: In the study, during the beginning of the pandemic and its progress; 50 COVID-19 patients treated in the intensive care unit between March-April-May/2020 were defined as group 1, and 50 COVID-19 patients treated in the intensive care unit between October-November-December/2020 were defined as group 2.Clinical, laboratory and intensive care processes of the patients in the groups were analyzed retrospectively and compared. Results:Demographic data were similar between groups. Group 2 patients had higher 28-day mortality, and this result was statistically significant (p = 0.006). Transfer rates of group 1 patients to the service after intensive care were found to be statistically higher (p = 0.029). Conclusıons:28-day mortality was found to be different between similar patient groups who were admitted to intensive care during different periods of the pandemic. The reasons for this may be: changes in pathogenicity as a result of viral mutations, different immune responses of hosts to viral infection, intensive care experience of healthcare professionals.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信