在MPLS网络中,以最少的标签交换路径实现最大的吞吐量

Hua Wang, Jianyu Lou, Yu Chen, Ya-Min Sun, Xiaojun Shen
{"title":"在MPLS网络中,以最少的标签交换路径实现最大的吞吐量","authors":"Hua Wang, Jianyu Lou, Yu Chen, Ya-Min Sun, Xiaojun Shen","doi":"10.1109/ICCCN.2005.1523841","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"MPLS (multi-protocol label switching) networks allow multiple LSPs (label-switched paths) be established from a source to a destination to satisfy throughput required by an application. Given a MPLS network, where each link is associated with a maximum available bandwidth, a fundamental traffic engineering problem is how we can find minimum number of paths to achieve the maximum throughput. Optimally solving this problem can save huge amount of valuable network resources including available label space and reduce management complexity. This paper proves that finding a minimal number of LSPs is an NP-hard problem. To deal with this problem, we have studied four approximation algorithms. We found from simulations that the average number of paths produced by all these algorithms grows quite slowly when the network grows large. Moreover, the two algorithms, topological-sort-based maximum-path algorithm and greedy-based maximum-edge algorithm perform better than other algorithms. Between these two algorithms, the greedy-based maximum-edge algorithm is more time-efficient while keeps comparable performance.","PeriodicalId":379037,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings. 14th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, 2005. ICCCN 2005.","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2005-10-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Achieving maximum throughput with a minimum number of label switched paths in MPLS networks\",\"authors\":\"Hua Wang, Jianyu Lou, Yu Chen, Ya-Min Sun, Xiaojun Shen\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICCCN.2005.1523841\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"MPLS (multi-protocol label switching) networks allow multiple LSPs (label-switched paths) be established from a source to a destination to satisfy throughput required by an application. Given a MPLS network, where each link is associated with a maximum available bandwidth, a fundamental traffic engineering problem is how we can find minimum number of paths to achieve the maximum throughput. Optimally solving this problem can save huge amount of valuable network resources including available label space and reduce management complexity. This paper proves that finding a minimal number of LSPs is an NP-hard problem. To deal with this problem, we have studied four approximation algorithms. We found from simulations that the average number of paths produced by all these algorithms grows quite slowly when the network grows large. Moreover, the two algorithms, topological-sort-based maximum-path algorithm and greedy-based maximum-edge algorithm perform better than other algorithms. Between these two algorithms, the greedy-based maximum-edge algorithm is more time-efficient while keeps comparable performance.\",\"PeriodicalId\":379037,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings. 14th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, 2005. ICCCN 2005.\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2005-10-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings. 14th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, 2005. ICCCN 2005.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCN.2005.1523841\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings. 14th International Conference on Computer Communications and Networks, 2005. ICCCN 2005.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCCN.2005.1523841","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

MPLS(多协议标签交换)网络允许从一个源到一个目的建立多条lsp(标签交换路径),以满足应用所需的吞吐量。对于MPLS网络,其中每个链路都与最大可用带宽相关联,一个基本的流量工程问题是我们如何找到最小数量的路径来实现最大吞吐量。优化解决这个问题可以节省大量宝贵的网络资源,包括可用的标签空间,降低管理的复杂性。本文证明了寻找最小数目的lsp是一个np困难问题。为了解决这个问题,我们研究了四种近似算法。我们从模拟中发现,当网络变大时,所有这些算法产生的平均路径数增长很慢。此外,基于拓扑排序的最大路径算法和基于贪婪的最大边缘算法两种算法的性能都优于其他算法。在这两种算法中,基于贪婪的最大边缘算法在保持相当性能的同时,时间效率更高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Achieving maximum throughput with a minimum number of label switched paths in MPLS networks
MPLS (multi-protocol label switching) networks allow multiple LSPs (label-switched paths) be established from a source to a destination to satisfy throughput required by an application. Given a MPLS network, where each link is associated with a maximum available bandwidth, a fundamental traffic engineering problem is how we can find minimum number of paths to achieve the maximum throughput. Optimally solving this problem can save huge amount of valuable network resources including available label space and reduce management complexity. This paper proves that finding a minimal number of LSPs is an NP-hard problem. To deal with this problem, we have studied four approximation algorithms. We found from simulations that the average number of paths produced by all these algorithms grows quite slowly when the network grows large. Moreover, the two algorithms, topological-sort-based maximum-path algorithm and greedy-based maximum-edge algorithm perform better than other algorithms. Between these two algorithms, the greedy-based maximum-edge algorithm is more time-efficient while keeps comparable performance.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信