ALOHA和CSMA/CA在可见光通信物联网网络中的实验比较

Armin Makvandi, Y. Kavian
{"title":"ALOHA和CSMA/CA在可见光通信物联网网络中的实验比较","authors":"Armin Makvandi, Y. Kavian","doi":"10.1109/wasowc54657.2022.9798436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper compares the performance of carrier-sense multiple access with collision avoidance (CSMA/CA) and pure ALOHA for visible light communication (VLC) Internet of Things (IoT) networks using experimental investigation. For the physical layer, we use the VLCIoT system. VLCIoT is a VLC hardware system that was designed and implemented in our previous work. For comparison, goodput, frame size, network load, and average delay are considered. The results show the advantage of CSMA/CA over pure ALOHA is when each node receives data from other nodes. Indeed, in VLC networks, due to the directionality of light, the effectiveness of carrier sensing in the CSMA/CA is sensitive to network setup. Furthermore, in low network load, which is common in IoT networks, the performance of CSMA/CA and pure ALOHA is not different significantly.","PeriodicalId":306222,"journal":{"name":"2022 4th West Asian Symposium on Optical and Millimeter-wave Wireless Communications (WASOWC)","volume":"16 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Experimental Comparison of ALOHA and CSMA/CA for Visible Light Communication IoT Networks\",\"authors\":\"Armin Makvandi, Y. Kavian\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/wasowc54657.2022.9798436\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper compares the performance of carrier-sense multiple access with collision avoidance (CSMA/CA) and pure ALOHA for visible light communication (VLC) Internet of Things (IoT) networks using experimental investigation. For the physical layer, we use the VLCIoT system. VLCIoT is a VLC hardware system that was designed and implemented in our previous work. For comparison, goodput, frame size, network load, and average delay are considered. The results show the advantage of CSMA/CA over pure ALOHA is when each node receives data from other nodes. Indeed, in VLC networks, due to the directionality of light, the effectiveness of carrier sensing in the CSMA/CA is sensitive to network setup. Furthermore, in low network load, which is common in IoT networks, the performance of CSMA/CA and pure ALOHA is not different significantly.\",\"PeriodicalId\":306222,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2022 4th West Asian Symposium on Optical and Millimeter-wave Wireless Communications (WASOWC)\",\"volume\":\"16 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-05-12\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2022 4th West Asian Symposium on Optical and Millimeter-wave Wireless Communications (WASOWC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/wasowc54657.2022.9798436\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2022 4th West Asian Symposium on Optical and Millimeter-wave Wireless Communications (WASOWC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/wasowc54657.2022.9798436","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

本文通过实验研究比较了碰撞避免(CSMA/CA)和纯ALOHA在可见光通信(VLC)物联网(IoT)网络中的性能。对于物理层,我们使用VLCIoT系统。VLCIoT是我们在前期工作中设计和实现的VLC硬件系统。为了进行比较,考虑了goodput、帧大小、网络负载和平均延迟。结果表明,CSMA/CA相对于纯ALOHA的优势在于每个节点从其他节点接收数据。事实上,在VLC网络中,由于光的方向性,CSMA/CA中载波传感的有效性对网络设置很敏感。此外,在物联网网络中常见的低网络负载情况下,CSMA/CA和纯ALOHA的性能没有显著差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Experimental Comparison of ALOHA and CSMA/CA for Visible Light Communication IoT Networks
This paper compares the performance of carrier-sense multiple access with collision avoidance (CSMA/CA) and pure ALOHA for visible light communication (VLC) Internet of Things (IoT) networks using experimental investigation. For the physical layer, we use the VLCIoT system. VLCIoT is a VLC hardware system that was designed and implemented in our previous work. For comparison, goodput, frame size, network load, and average delay are considered. The results show the advantage of CSMA/CA over pure ALOHA is when each node receives data from other nodes. Indeed, in VLC networks, due to the directionality of light, the effectiveness of carrier sensing in the CSMA/CA is sensitive to network setup. Furthermore, in low network load, which is common in IoT networks, the performance of CSMA/CA and pure ALOHA is not different significantly.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信