Flávio de Souza Araújo, R. M. R. Dias, R. L. Nascimento, Eduardo Seiji Numata Filho, J. F. V. D. Moraes, S. Moreira
{"title":"等长抗阻训练对男性血压和体质的影响","authors":"Flávio de Souza Araújo, R. M. R. Dias, R. L. Nascimento, Eduardo Seiji Numata Filho, J. F. V. D. Moraes, S. Moreira","doi":"10.1590/S1980-6574201800020012","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aims: The present study aimed to investigate the effects of whole body isometric resistance training (IRT) on blood pressure (BP), strength and aerobic fitness. We also analyzed whether the effects of whole body isometric training compares to whole body dynamic resistance training (DRT). Methods: Twenty-nine pre-hypertensive sedentary males, aged between 40 and 60 years were divided into three groups: IRT (n = 10), DRT (n = 9), and Control (n = 10). Both programs involved whole body resistance training, and occurred for 12 weeks, three times/week, at an intensity of 60% of a dynamic one repetition maximum test (1RM). Before and after 12 weeks, 24 hours blood pressure monitoring, 1RM strength and aerobic fitness were assessed. Results: IRT reduced diastolic BP values during a 24-hour period and daytime. There was also a decrease in mean BP values during daytime (P < 0.05). No interaction between time and group in systolic BP, diastolic BP, mean BP, heart rate and arterial stiffness index were observed (P > 0.05). IRT increased strength and aerobic fitness when compared to Control group. However, these changes were lower than DRT regarding strength (DRT: ∆ = 43.1±10.6% vs. IRT: ∆ = 24.1±7.1% vs. CON: Δ = 4.2±11.5%; P < 0.05) and aerobic fitness (DRT: ∆ = 22.9±10.7% vs. IRT: ∆ = 12.9±6.1% vs. CON: Δ = -2.1±7.4%; P < 0.01). Conclusion: Whole body IRT reduced diastolic BP and mean BP, however, the decrease was not different for the DRT group. IRT also increased strength and aerobic fitness, nevertheless, these changes were lower than after DRT.","PeriodicalId":153884,"journal":{"name":"Motriz: Revista de Educação Física","volume":"123 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2018-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effects of isometric resistance training on blood pressure and physical fitness of men\",\"authors\":\"Flávio de Souza Araújo, R. M. R. Dias, R. L. Nascimento, Eduardo Seiji Numata Filho, J. F. V. D. Moraes, S. Moreira\",\"doi\":\"10.1590/S1980-6574201800020012\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aims: The present study aimed to investigate the effects of whole body isometric resistance training (IRT) on blood pressure (BP), strength and aerobic fitness. We also analyzed whether the effects of whole body isometric training compares to whole body dynamic resistance training (DRT). Methods: Twenty-nine pre-hypertensive sedentary males, aged between 40 and 60 years were divided into three groups: IRT (n = 10), DRT (n = 9), and Control (n = 10). Both programs involved whole body resistance training, and occurred for 12 weeks, three times/week, at an intensity of 60% of a dynamic one repetition maximum test (1RM). Before and after 12 weeks, 24 hours blood pressure monitoring, 1RM strength and aerobic fitness were assessed. Results: IRT reduced diastolic BP values during a 24-hour period and daytime. There was also a decrease in mean BP values during daytime (P < 0.05). No interaction between time and group in systolic BP, diastolic BP, mean BP, heart rate and arterial stiffness index were observed (P > 0.05). IRT increased strength and aerobic fitness when compared to Control group. However, these changes were lower than DRT regarding strength (DRT: ∆ = 43.1±10.6% vs. IRT: ∆ = 24.1±7.1% vs. CON: Δ = 4.2±11.5%; P < 0.05) and aerobic fitness (DRT: ∆ = 22.9±10.7% vs. IRT: ∆ = 12.9±6.1% vs. CON: Δ = -2.1±7.4%; P < 0.01). Conclusion: Whole body IRT reduced diastolic BP and mean BP, however, the decrease was not different for the DRT group. IRT also increased strength and aerobic fitness, nevertheless, these changes were lower than after DRT.\",\"PeriodicalId\":153884,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Motriz: Revista de Educação Física\",\"volume\":\"123 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Motriz: Revista de Educação Física\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-6574201800020012\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Motriz: Revista de Educação Física","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-6574201800020012","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6
摘要
目的:本研究旨在探讨全身等长阻力训练(IRT)对血压(BP)、力量和有氧健身的影响。我们还分析了全身等长训练与全身动态阻力训练(DRT)的效果。方法:29名40 ~ 60岁的高血压前期久坐男性分为三组:IRT组(n = 10)、DRT组(n = 9)和对照组(n = 10)。这两个项目都包括全身阻力训练,持续12周,每周3次,强度为动态一次最大重复测试(1RM)的60%。12周前后进行24小时血压监测、1RM力量和有氧适能评估。结果:IRT降低了24小时和白天的舒张压值。白天平均血压值降低(P < 0.05)。收缩压、舒张压、平均血压、心率、动脉僵硬指数在时间和组间无交互作用(P > 0.05)。与对照组相比,IRT增加了力量和有氧适能。然而,在强度方面,这些变化低于DRT (DRT:∆= 43.1±10.6% vs. IRT:∆= 24.1±7.1% vs. CON: Δ = 4.2±11.5%;P < 0.05)和有氧适能(DRT:∆= 22.9±10.7% vs. IRT:∆= 12.9±6.1% vs. CON: Δ = -2.1±7.4%;P < 0.01)。结论:全身IRT可降低舒张压和平均血压,而DRT组的降低无明显差异。IRT也增加了力量和有氧适应度,然而,这些变化低于DRT后。
Effects of isometric resistance training on blood pressure and physical fitness of men
Aims: The present study aimed to investigate the effects of whole body isometric resistance training (IRT) on blood pressure (BP), strength and aerobic fitness. We also analyzed whether the effects of whole body isometric training compares to whole body dynamic resistance training (DRT). Methods: Twenty-nine pre-hypertensive sedentary males, aged between 40 and 60 years were divided into three groups: IRT (n = 10), DRT (n = 9), and Control (n = 10). Both programs involved whole body resistance training, and occurred for 12 weeks, three times/week, at an intensity of 60% of a dynamic one repetition maximum test (1RM). Before and after 12 weeks, 24 hours blood pressure monitoring, 1RM strength and aerobic fitness were assessed. Results: IRT reduced diastolic BP values during a 24-hour period and daytime. There was also a decrease in mean BP values during daytime (P < 0.05). No interaction between time and group in systolic BP, diastolic BP, mean BP, heart rate and arterial stiffness index were observed (P > 0.05). IRT increased strength and aerobic fitness when compared to Control group. However, these changes were lower than DRT regarding strength (DRT: ∆ = 43.1±10.6% vs. IRT: ∆ = 24.1±7.1% vs. CON: Δ = 4.2±11.5%; P < 0.05) and aerobic fitness (DRT: ∆ = 22.9±10.7% vs. IRT: ∆ = 12.9±6.1% vs. CON: Δ = -2.1±7.4%; P < 0.01). Conclusion: Whole body IRT reduced diastolic BP and mean BP, however, the decrease was not different for the DRT group. IRT also increased strength and aerobic fitness, nevertheless, these changes were lower than after DRT.