单纯幅度估计与幅度相位估计

Y. Rolain, R. Pintelon, J. Schoukens
{"title":"单纯幅度估计与幅度相位估计","authors":"Y. Rolain, R. Pintelon, J. Schoukens","doi":"10.1109/IMTC.1990.65948","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The feasibility of transfer function estimation based on amplitude-only measurements is investigated, and this method is compared with the amplitude-phase (full complex spectrum) method. It is shown that the amplitude-only-based method is a feasible alternative to the full complex spectrum method when the minimum in-phase transfer function of the system is needed or when there is some a priori knowledge about the nonminimal in-phase character of the system. It appears that transfer function estimation of linear systems using amplitude information only is possible if care is taken to circumvent the degeneration problems of the information matrix. The performance of the amplitude-only estimation is compared with the performance of a full complex estimation, both analytically and through simulation. The amplitude-only estimation appears to yield a larger standard deviation on the transfer function parameters. Optimal excitation for both cases seems to be quite different. The complex estimation shows good results when only passband information is provided. In this case the amplitude-only estimation is shown to be worthless. However, extending the measurements in the transition band of the system implies a large lowering of the parameter uncertainty and allows the use of this method.<<ETX>>","PeriodicalId":404761,"journal":{"name":"7th IEEE Conference on Instrumentation and Measurement Technology","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1990-02-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Amplitude-only versus amplitude-phase estimation\",\"authors\":\"Y. Rolain, R. Pintelon, J. Schoukens\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/IMTC.1990.65948\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The feasibility of transfer function estimation based on amplitude-only measurements is investigated, and this method is compared with the amplitude-phase (full complex spectrum) method. It is shown that the amplitude-only-based method is a feasible alternative to the full complex spectrum method when the minimum in-phase transfer function of the system is needed or when there is some a priori knowledge about the nonminimal in-phase character of the system. It appears that transfer function estimation of linear systems using amplitude information only is possible if care is taken to circumvent the degeneration problems of the information matrix. The performance of the amplitude-only estimation is compared with the performance of a full complex estimation, both analytically and through simulation. The amplitude-only estimation appears to yield a larger standard deviation on the transfer function parameters. Optimal excitation for both cases seems to be quite different. The complex estimation shows good results when only passband information is provided. In this case the amplitude-only estimation is shown to be worthless. However, extending the measurements in the transition band of the system implies a large lowering of the parameter uncertainty and allows the use of this method.<<ETX>>\",\"PeriodicalId\":404761,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"7th IEEE Conference on Instrumentation and Measurement Technology\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1990-02-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"7th IEEE Conference on Instrumentation and Measurement Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMTC.1990.65948\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"7th IEEE Conference on Instrumentation and Measurement Technology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/IMTC.1990.65948","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

研究了仅基于幅值的传递函数估计的可行性,并与幅相法(全复谱法)进行了比较。结果表明,当需要系统的最小同相传递函数或对系统的非最小同相特性有一定先验知识时,仅基于幅值的方法是替代全复谱法的可行方法。如果注意避免信息矩阵的退化问题,似乎仅使用幅度信息的线性系统的传递函数估计是可能的。通过分析和仿真,比较了纯幅估计与全复估计的性能。仅振幅估计似乎在传递函数参数上产生较大的标准偏差。两种情况下的最优激励似乎有很大的不同。在只提供通带信息的情况下,复估计效果良好。在这种情况下,只有幅度的估计是毫无价值的。然而,扩展系统过渡带的测量意味着参数不确定度的大大降低,并允许使用该方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Amplitude-only versus amplitude-phase estimation
The feasibility of transfer function estimation based on amplitude-only measurements is investigated, and this method is compared with the amplitude-phase (full complex spectrum) method. It is shown that the amplitude-only-based method is a feasible alternative to the full complex spectrum method when the minimum in-phase transfer function of the system is needed or when there is some a priori knowledge about the nonminimal in-phase character of the system. It appears that transfer function estimation of linear systems using amplitude information only is possible if care is taken to circumvent the degeneration problems of the information matrix. The performance of the amplitude-only estimation is compared with the performance of a full complex estimation, both analytically and through simulation. The amplitude-only estimation appears to yield a larger standard deviation on the transfer function parameters. Optimal excitation for both cases seems to be quite different. The complex estimation shows good results when only passband information is provided. In this case the amplitude-only estimation is shown to be worthless. However, extending the measurements in the transition band of the system implies a large lowering of the parameter uncertainty and allows the use of this method.<>
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信