医疗领域的可接受性与5G:信息化水平的影响

Nicolas Martin, Martin Ragot, V. Savaux
{"title":"医疗领域的可接受性与5G:信息化水平的影响","authors":"Nicolas Martin, Martin Ragot, V. Savaux","doi":"10.1109/ZINC52049.2021.9499276","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The issues around 5G are considerable: sovereignty, smart city, industry 4.0, energy, connected healthcare. However, 5G is currently raising many questions from the general public and professionals. To better understand these questions related to acceptability, a quantitative experimental study was conducted with 81 healthcare professionals, via an online questionnaire. The objective is to analyse the impact of the level of information on acceptability. The participants were divided into two experimental groups, confronted either with a low level of information or a high level of information about 5G. Several dimensions were analyzed (perceived usefulness and usability, intention to use, harmfulness and perceived environmental impact). The results show a significant influence of the level of information related to 5G on the number of \"I don’t know\" responses participants. More broadly, this study demonstrates the influence of respondents’ level of information on their ability to express an opinion. These results provides insights for the construction of survey and public policies around 5G and new technologies acceptability.","PeriodicalId":308106,"journal":{"name":"2021 Zooming Innovation in Consumer Technologies Conference (ZINC)","volume":"13 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Acceptability and 5G in the Medical Field: The Impact of the Level of Information\",\"authors\":\"Nicolas Martin, Martin Ragot, V. Savaux\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ZINC52049.2021.9499276\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The issues around 5G are considerable: sovereignty, smart city, industry 4.0, energy, connected healthcare. However, 5G is currently raising many questions from the general public and professionals. To better understand these questions related to acceptability, a quantitative experimental study was conducted with 81 healthcare professionals, via an online questionnaire. The objective is to analyse the impact of the level of information on acceptability. The participants were divided into two experimental groups, confronted either with a low level of information or a high level of information about 5G. Several dimensions were analyzed (perceived usefulness and usability, intention to use, harmfulness and perceived environmental impact). The results show a significant influence of the level of information related to 5G on the number of \\\"I don’t know\\\" responses participants. More broadly, this study demonstrates the influence of respondents’ level of information on their ability to express an opinion. These results provides insights for the construction of survey and public policies around 5G and new technologies acceptability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":308106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 Zooming Innovation in Consumer Technologies Conference (ZINC)\",\"volume\":\"13 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-05-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 Zooming Innovation in Consumer Technologies Conference (ZINC)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ZINC52049.2021.9499276\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 Zooming Innovation in Consumer Technologies Conference (ZINC)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ZINC52049.2021.9499276","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

围绕5G的问题相当大:主权、智慧城市、工业4.0、能源、互联医疗。然而,5G目前引发了公众和专业人士的许多问题。为了更好地理解这些与可接受性相关的问题,我们通过在线问卷对81名医疗保健专业人员进行了定量实验研究。目的是分析信息水平对可接受性的影响。参与者被分为两个实验组,分别面对关于5G的低水平信息和高水平信息。分析了几个维度(感知有用性和可用性、使用意图、有害性和感知环境影响)。结果显示,与5G相关的信息水平对回答“我不知道”的参与者数量有显著影响。更广泛地说,这项研究证明了受访者的信息水平对他们表达意见的能力的影响。这些结果为围绕5G和新技术可接受性的调查和公共政策的构建提供了见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Acceptability and 5G in the Medical Field: The Impact of the Level of Information
The issues around 5G are considerable: sovereignty, smart city, industry 4.0, energy, connected healthcare. However, 5G is currently raising many questions from the general public and professionals. To better understand these questions related to acceptability, a quantitative experimental study was conducted with 81 healthcare professionals, via an online questionnaire. The objective is to analyse the impact of the level of information on acceptability. The participants were divided into two experimental groups, confronted either with a low level of information or a high level of information about 5G. Several dimensions were analyzed (perceived usefulness and usability, intention to use, harmfulness and perceived environmental impact). The results show a significant influence of the level of information related to 5G on the number of "I don’t know" responses participants. More broadly, this study demonstrates the influence of respondents’ level of information on their ability to express an opinion. These results provides insights for the construction of survey and public policies around 5G and new technologies acceptability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信