The Role of the " La Haraj" Rule to Prove or Disclaim the Civil Liability of the Government

The "La Haraj" rule is one of the most important rules concerning the civil liability of the government, which in some cases conflicts with the "La Zarar" (no damage) rule. In such cases we must try to find a reason to prefer one over another, otherwise the two reasons conflict and disapprove and another reason must be sought. It seems easier to practice this rule than citing the rule of "La Zarar" to deny civil liability regarding that the concept of hardship is more general in many cases and there is no need to hardship outer happening in terms of hardship conditions occurring; If the government takes action to eject hardship from the majority of individuals which may cause hardship to a minority, it is obligatory to do so due to the public hardship's ejection takes precedence over individuals hardship. But in relation to situational effects, if individuals hardship occurs, the government must amends it wherefore any damage must be compensated. If individuals hardship occurs but not lead to any damage, there no liability for the government to eject it.