来自喜力与爱:詹姆斯·邦德产品推广

Lalin Anik, J. Miles
{"title":"来自喜力与爱:詹姆斯·邦德产品推广","authors":"Lalin Anik, J. Miles","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3017473","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The producers of the newest James Bond film, Spectre, had a difficult sponsorship decision to make before filming of the movie began in one month. Up for consideration was a highly lucrative product promotion with Heineken, which offered both a sizable contribution to the film as well as a high-budget advertising campaign. The studio was looking for any way it could to reduce the cost of the film (which was nearing $250 million), but the producers were concerned about the negative backlash they had unwittingly unleashed when they'd shown Bond drinking a Heineken in Skyfall, as opposed to his usual vodka martini. How should the producers approach the Heineken deal? How could they assess the benefits and risks of associating Bond with a Dutch beer? This potential tension between brand cultures allows for a rich discussion. Furthermore, the case introduces the concept of \"cool\" and challenges the students to dive deeper into understanding its four dimensions to answer questions such as \"What makes James Bond cool?\" \"Can James Bond be uncool?\" and \"How can the brand sustain its coolness in partnership with potentially conflicting brands?\"This case is appropriate for use both in a first-year marketing course as well as a higher-level elective with MBAs and executives. This case would be most impactful if taught along with the technical note \"A General Theory of Coolness\" (UVA-M-0953), as the framework therein could be applied to expand the current discussion. \nExcerpt \nUVA-M-0952 \nRev. Dec. 6, 2017 \nFrom Heineken with Love: James Bond Product Promotion \nThe producers of the newest James Bond film, Spectre, had a difficult decision to make before filming began in one month. Expectations for the follow-up to Skyfall, the most successful Bond film ever at the box office, were incredibly high among fans and the film industry. Spectre would have to be bigger and better, with a larger budget as well. While Bond was a fan favorite, not every Bond movie had done well in the theaters, and Spectre's budget of around $ 250million made it hugely expensive and potentially risky. The studio was looking for any way it could to reduce the cost of the film without sacrificing the audience experience. \nUp for consideration was a highly lucrative product promotion. Heineken was hoping to continue its long-running sponsorship of the series. In return for featuring its beer in Spectre, it was willing to make a sizeable contribution to the film. It would also pledge to spend $ 100million to cross-promote its beer and the movie with a flashy advertising campaign. Nevertheless, the producers were concerned about the negative backlash they had unwittingly unleashed when they'd shown Bond drinking a Heineken in Skyfall, as opposed to his usual vodka martini. \nHow should the producers approach the Heineken deal? How could they assess the benefits and risks of associating Bond with a Dutch beer? \n. . .","PeriodicalId":121773,"journal":{"name":"Darden Case: Business Communications (Topic)","volume":"69 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Heineken with Love: James Bond Product Promotion\",\"authors\":\"Lalin Anik, J. Miles\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3017473\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The producers of the newest James Bond film, Spectre, had a difficult sponsorship decision to make before filming of the movie began in one month. Up for consideration was a highly lucrative product promotion with Heineken, which offered both a sizable contribution to the film as well as a high-budget advertising campaign. The studio was looking for any way it could to reduce the cost of the film (which was nearing $250 million), but the producers were concerned about the negative backlash they had unwittingly unleashed when they'd shown Bond drinking a Heineken in Skyfall, as opposed to his usual vodka martini. How should the producers approach the Heineken deal? How could they assess the benefits and risks of associating Bond with a Dutch beer? This potential tension between brand cultures allows for a rich discussion. Furthermore, the case introduces the concept of \\\"cool\\\" and challenges the students to dive deeper into understanding its four dimensions to answer questions such as \\\"What makes James Bond cool?\\\" \\\"Can James Bond be uncool?\\\" and \\\"How can the brand sustain its coolness in partnership with potentially conflicting brands?\\\"This case is appropriate for use both in a first-year marketing course as well as a higher-level elective with MBAs and executives. This case would be most impactful if taught along with the technical note \\\"A General Theory of Coolness\\\" (UVA-M-0953), as the framework therein could be applied to expand the current discussion. \\nExcerpt \\nUVA-M-0952 \\nRev. Dec. 6, 2017 \\nFrom Heineken with Love: James Bond Product Promotion \\nThe producers of the newest James Bond film, Spectre, had a difficult decision to make before filming began in one month. Expectations for the follow-up to Skyfall, the most successful Bond film ever at the box office, were incredibly high among fans and the film industry. Spectre would have to be bigger and better, with a larger budget as well. While Bond was a fan favorite, not every Bond movie had done well in the theaters, and Spectre's budget of around $ 250million made it hugely expensive and potentially risky. The studio was looking for any way it could to reduce the cost of the film without sacrificing the audience experience. \\nUp for consideration was a highly lucrative product promotion. Heineken was hoping to continue its long-running sponsorship of the series. In return for featuring its beer in Spectre, it was willing to make a sizeable contribution to the film. It would also pledge to spend $ 100million to cross-promote its beer and the movie with a flashy advertising campaign. Nevertheless, the producers were concerned about the negative backlash they had unwittingly unleashed when they'd shown Bond drinking a Heineken in Skyfall, as opposed to his usual vodka martini. \\nHow should the producers approach the Heineken deal? How could they assess the benefits and risks of associating Bond with a Dutch beer? \\n. . .\",\"PeriodicalId\":121773,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Darden Case: Business Communications (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"69 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Darden Case: Business Communications (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3017473\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Darden Case: Business Communications (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3017473","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

最新的詹姆斯·邦德电影《幽灵党》(Spectre)的制片人在电影开拍一个月前,遇到了一个艰难的赞助决定。他们考虑的是与喜力(Heineken)合作的一次利润丰厚的产品推广活动,这不仅为影片提供了可观的资金,而且还进行了高预算的广告宣传。电影公司正在寻找任何可能的方法来降低电影的成本(接近2.5亿美元),但制片人担心他们无意中引发的负面反应,因为他们在《007:大破天幕杀机》中展示了邦德喝喜力啤酒,而不是他平时喝的伏特加马提尼。生产商应该如何处理与喜力的交易?他们如何评估将邦德与荷兰啤酒联系在一起的收益和风险?品牌文化之间的这种潜在紧张关系可以引发丰富的讨论。此外,案例还引入了“酷”的概念,并要求学生深入了解“酷”的四个维度,以回答诸如“是什么让詹姆斯·邦德变得酷?”“詹姆斯·邦德会不酷吗?”以及“该品牌如何在与潜在冲突品牌的合作中保持其酷感?”这个案例既适用于第一年的市场营销课程,也适用于mba和高管的高级选修课。如果这个案例与技术说明“冷的一般理论”(UVA-M-0953)一起教授,将是最有影响力的,因为其中的框架可以应用于扩大当前的讨论。最新的詹姆斯·邦德电影《007:幽灵党》的制片人在一个月开拍前做出了一个艰难的决定。《007:大破天幕杀机》是有史以来票房最成功的邦德电影,影迷和电影行业对这部电影的续集抱有极高的期望。《幽灵党》必须更大更好,预算也要更大。虽然邦德是影迷的最爱,但并不是每部邦德电影都在影院取得好成绩,《幽灵党》约2.5亿美元的预算使得它非常昂贵,而且存在潜在风险。制片厂正在寻找任何可以在不牺牲观众体验的情况下降低电影成本的方法。考虑的是一个利润丰厚的产品促销活动。喜力希望继续长期赞助该系列赛。作为在《幽灵党》中展示其啤酒的回报,它愿意为这部电影做出相当大的贡献。该公司还承诺斥资1亿美元,通过一场华丽的广告活动来交叉推广其啤酒和这部电影。尽管如此,制片方还是担心邦德在《007:大破天幕杀机》中喝喜力啤酒,而不是他平时喝的伏特加马提尼,这无意中引发了负面反应。生产商应该如何处理与喜力的交易?他们如何评估将邦德与荷兰啤酒联系在一起的收益和风险?……
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
From Heineken with Love: James Bond Product Promotion
The producers of the newest James Bond film, Spectre, had a difficult sponsorship decision to make before filming of the movie began in one month. Up for consideration was a highly lucrative product promotion with Heineken, which offered both a sizable contribution to the film as well as a high-budget advertising campaign. The studio was looking for any way it could to reduce the cost of the film (which was nearing $250 million), but the producers were concerned about the negative backlash they had unwittingly unleashed when they'd shown Bond drinking a Heineken in Skyfall, as opposed to his usual vodka martini. How should the producers approach the Heineken deal? How could they assess the benefits and risks of associating Bond with a Dutch beer? This potential tension between brand cultures allows for a rich discussion. Furthermore, the case introduces the concept of "cool" and challenges the students to dive deeper into understanding its four dimensions to answer questions such as "What makes James Bond cool?" "Can James Bond be uncool?" and "How can the brand sustain its coolness in partnership with potentially conflicting brands?"This case is appropriate for use both in a first-year marketing course as well as a higher-level elective with MBAs and executives. This case would be most impactful if taught along with the technical note "A General Theory of Coolness" (UVA-M-0953), as the framework therein could be applied to expand the current discussion. Excerpt UVA-M-0952 Rev. Dec. 6, 2017 From Heineken with Love: James Bond Product Promotion The producers of the newest James Bond film, Spectre, had a difficult decision to make before filming began in one month. Expectations for the follow-up to Skyfall, the most successful Bond film ever at the box office, were incredibly high among fans and the film industry. Spectre would have to be bigger and better, with a larger budget as well. While Bond was a fan favorite, not every Bond movie had done well in the theaters, and Spectre's budget of around $ 250million made it hugely expensive and potentially risky. The studio was looking for any way it could to reduce the cost of the film without sacrificing the audience experience. Up for consideration was a highly lucrative product promotion. Heineken was hoping to continue its long-running sponsorship of the series. In return for featuring its beer in Spectre, it was willing to make a sizeable contribution to the film. It would also pledge to spend $ 100million to cross-promote its beer and the movie with a flashy advertising campaign. Nevertheless, the producers were concerned about the negative backlash they had unwittingly unleashed when they'd shown Bond drinking a Heineken in Skyfall, as opposed to his usual vodka martini. How should the producers approach the Heineken deal? How could they assess the benefits and risks of associating Bond with a Dutch beer? . . .
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信