{"title":"制度人种学与技术科学的女性主义研究","authors":"Riikka Homanen","doi":"10.4324/9780429019999-6","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This chapter is about doing politics in theory. Specifically, it is about how and what institutional ethnography (IE) and feminist studies of technoscience (FT) allow us to observe. I ask how one might conduct studies that explore normativity, not only in the researcher-author-subject relationship but also in the subject matter (cf. Mol and Mesman 1996). What kinds of (observed) realities might be viewed as politically acceptable?","PeriodicalId":190239,"journal":{"name":"Institutional Ethnography in the Nordic Region","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Institutional ethnography and feminist studies of technoscience\",\"authors\":\"Riikka Homanen\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9780429019999-6\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This chapter is about doing politics in theory. Specifically, it is about how and what institutional ethnography (IE) and feminist studies of technoscience (FT) allow us to observe. I ask how one might conduct studies that explore normativity, not only in the researcher-author-subject relationship but also in the subject matter (cf. Mol and Mesman 1996). What kinds of (observed) realities might be viewed as politically acceptable?\",\"PeriodicalId\":190239,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Institutional Ethnography in the Nordic Region\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Institutional Ethnography in the Nordic Region\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429019999-6\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Institutional Ethnography in the Nordic Region","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429019999-6","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Institutional ethnography and feminist studies of technoscience
This chapter is about doing politics in theory. Specifically, it is about how and what institutional ethnography (IE) and feminist studies of technoscience (FT) allow us to observe. I ask how one might conduct studies that explore normativity, not only in the researcher-author-subject relationship but also in the subject matter (cf. Mol and Mesman 1996). What kinds of (observed) realities might be viewed as politically acceptable?
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
