Pablo Cruz, H. Astudillo, R. Hilliard, Miguel Collado
{"title":"使用ATAM评估一个20年的系统向微服务平台的迁移","authors":"Pablo Cruz, H. Astudillo, R. Hilliard, Miguel Collado","doi":"10.1109/ICSA-C.2019.00039","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Architecture evaluation is a systematic approach to evaluate target architectures and ATAM (Architectural Trade-off Analysis Method) is one of the available methods. Migration of software systems imply many architectural decisions that should be systematically evaluated to assess concrete trade-offs and risks. This article reports on the ATAM usage at a mid-size Chilean specialty software development company to assess the migration of its 20-year old flagship product to a micro-service platform. Over three days, 10 key architectural decisions, addressing 35 scenarios, were considered. Since almost all requirements were deemed essential for legal reasons, the evaluation scheme used a modified importance dimension distinguishing among business-key (first line deal breakers), legally-mandated (second-line deal breakers), and desirable requirements. Key lessons learned include the very positive client feedback on the introduction of systematic evaluation of architectural choices using business criteria.","PeriodicalId":239999,"journal":{"name":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)","volume":"50 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"10","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Assessing Migration of a 20-Year-Old System to a Micro-Service Platform Using ATAM\",\"authors\":\"Pablo Cruz, H. Astudillo, R. Hilliard, Miguel Collado\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/ICSA-C.2019.00039\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Architecture evaluation is a systematic approach to evaluate target architectures and ATAM (Architectural Trade-off Analysis Method) is one of the available methods. Migration of software systems imply many architectural decisions that should be systematically evaluated to assess concrete trade-offs and risks. This article reports on the ATAM usage at a mid-size Chilean specialty software development company to assess the migration of its 20-year old flagship product to a micro-service platform. Over three days, 10 key architectural decisions, addressing 35 scenarios, were considered. Since almost all requirements were deemed essential for legal reasons, the evaluation scheme used a modified importance dimension distinguishing among business-key (first line deal breakers), legally-mandated (second-line deal breakers), and desirable requirements. Key lessons learned include the very positive client feedback on the introduction of systematic evaluation of architectural choices using business criteria.\",\"PeriodicalId\":239999,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)\",\"volume\":\"50 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-25\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"10\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA-C.2019.00039\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2019 IEEE International Conference on Software Architecture Companion (ICSA-C)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/ICSA-C.2019.00039","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Assessing Migration of a 20-Year-Old System to a Micro-Service Platform Using ATAM
Architecture evaluation is a systematic approach to evaluate target architectures and ATAM (Architectural Trade-off Analysis Method) is one of the available methods. Migration of software systems imply many architectural decisions that should be systematically evaluated to assess concrete trade-offs and risks. This article reports on the ATAM usage at a mid-size Chilean specialty software development company to assess the migration of its 20-year old flagship product to a micro-service platform. Over three days, 10 key architectural decisions, addressing 35 scenarios, were considered. Since almost all requirements were deemed essential for legal reasons, the evaluation scheme used a modified importance dimension distinguishing among business-key (first line deal breakers), legally-mandated (second-line deal breakers), and desirable requirements. Key lessons learned include the very positive client feedback on the introduction of systematic evaluation of architectural choices using business criteria.