Trung Nguyen, David Gentile, G. Jamieson, R. Gosine, Hakimeh Purmehdi
{"title":"设计一个基于字形的极坐标图来解释机器学习模型的结果","authors":"Trung Nguyen, David Gentile, G. Jamieson, R. Gosine, Hakimeh Purmehdi","doi":"10.1177/10648046231166047","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Explainable artificial intelligence practices can support data scientists in interpreting the results of machine learning (ML) models. However, current practices require effortful and time-consuming coding to compare explanations that either relate to different ML models of the same data, or that are generated with different computational methods. We report the development of a glyph-based polar chart (GPC), designed to support a more comprehensive interpretation of the results of ML models by allowing these comparisons. The results from our user experience evaluation indicated that the proposed GPC supported data scientists in identifying the most relevant model variables, comparing different explanation methods, and performing logic reviews.","PeriodicalId":357563,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications","volume":"31 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing a Glyph-Based Polar Chart to Interpret the Results of Machine Learning Models\",\"authors\":\"Trung Nguyen, David Gentile, G. Jamieson, R. Gosine, Hakimeh Purmehdi\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/10648046231166047\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Explainable artificial intelligence practices can support data scientists in interpreting the results of machine learning (ML) models. However, current practices require effortful and time-consuming coding to compare explanations that either relate to different ML models of the same data, or that are generated with different computational methods. We report the development of a glyph-based polar chart (GPC), designed to support a more comprehensive interpretation of the results of ML models by allowing these comparisons. The results from our user experience evaluation indicated that the proposed GPC supported data scientists in identifying the most relevant model variables, comparing different explanation methods, and performing logic reviews.\",\"PeriodicalId\":357563,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications\",\"volume\":\"31 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/10648046231166047\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics in Design: The Quarterly of Human Factors Applications","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/10648046231166047","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Designing a Glyph-Based Polar Chart to Interpret the Results of Machine Learning Models
Explainable artificial intelligence practices can support data scientists in interpreting the results of machine learning (ML) models. However, current practices require effortful and time-consuming coding to compare explanations that either relate to different ML models of the same data, or that are generated with different computational methods. We report the development of a glyph-based polar chart (GPC), designed to support a more comprehensive interpretation of the results of ML models by allowing these comparisons. The results from our user experience evaluation indicated that the proposed GPC supported data scientists in identifying the most relevant model variables, comparing different explanation methods, and performing logic reviews.