基于相似性的实体关联优化算法

ACM-SE 33 Pub Date : 1995-03-17 DOI:10.1145/1122018.1122024
Olivier Brissac
{"title":"基于相似性的实体关联优化算法","authors":"Olivier Brissac","doi":"10.1145/1122018.1122024","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Some inductive learning systems enable structural descriptions of examples, based on elementary entities whose value can be either symbolic or numerical. This paper studies such systems, especially the ones that use a similarity measure defined between elementary entities. As it is the case in our system [12], [13], in a learning process, the matching step leads to a generalization of the training set. The main benefit of a similarity based matching step is to enable symbolic as well as numeric values processing. Given a pair of examples, learning algorithms using a similarity measure begin with computing this measure for all entities pairs taken in both examples. When it comes to choosing which entities are to be associated, a greedy method is used: entities are associated by pairs in decreasing similarity order. This paper proposes an alternative to this greedy choice based on a network flow algorithm providing an optimal result, according to the given similarity function. Furthermore, we study a generalization of this approach and we show the general case to be NP-complete. After a discussion on theoretical and practical use of the optimal method, we give some directions for further works.","PeriodicalId":349974,"journal":{"name":"ACM-SE 33","volume":"28 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1995-03-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An optimal algorithm for similarity based entity association\",\"authors\":\"Olivier Brissac\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1122018.1122024\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Some inductive learning systems enable structural descriptions of examples, based on elementary entities whose value can be either symbolic or numerical. This paper studies such systems, especially the ones that use a similarity measure defined between elementary entities. As it is the case in our system [12], [13], in a learning process, the matching step leads to a generalization of the training set. The main benefit of a similarity based matching step is to enable symbolic as well as numeric values processing. Given a pair of examples, learning algorithms using a similarity measure begin with computing this measure for all entities pairs taken in both examples. When it comes to choosing which entities are to be associated, a greedy method is used: entities are associated by pairs in decreasing similarity order. This paper proposes an alternative to this greedy choice based on a network flow algorithm providing an optimal result, according to the given similarity function. Furthermore, we study a generalization of this approach and we show the general case to be NP-complete. After a discussion on theoretical and practical use of the optimal method, we give some directions for further works.\",\"PeriodicalId\":349974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM-SE 33\",\"volume\":\"28 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1995-03-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM-SE 33\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1122018.1122024\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM-SE 33","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1122018.1122024","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

一些归纳学习系统能够基于基本实体对例子进行结构化描述,这些基本实体的值可以是符号的,也可以是数值的。本文研究了这样的系统,特别是那些使用在基本实体之间定义的相似度量的系统。与我们的系统[12],[13]一样,在学习过程中,匹配步骤导致训练集的泛化。基于相似性的匹配步骤的主要好处是支持符号和数值处理。给定一对示例,使用相似性度量的学习算法首先计算两个示例中所有实体对的相似性度量。在选择要关联哪些实体时,使用了贪婪方法:实体按相似性递减的顺序成对关联。本文提出了一种基于网络流算法的替代方案,该算法根据给定的相似度函数提供最优结果。进一步,我们研究了这种方法的推广,并证明了一般情况是np完全的。在讨论了优化方法的理论和实际应用的基础上,提出了进一步研究的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
An optimal algorithm for similarity based entity association
Some inductive learning systems enable structural descriptions of examples, based on elementary entities whose value can be either symbolic or numerical. This paper studies such systems, especially the ones that use a similarity measure defined between elementary entities. As it is the case in our system [12], [13], in a learning process, the matching step leads to a generalization of the training set. The main benefit of a similarity based matching step is to enable symbolic as well as numeric values processing. Given a pair of examples, learning algorithms using a similarity measure begin with computing this measure for all entities pairs taken in both examples. When it comes to choosing which entities are to be associated, a greedy method is used: entities are associated by pairs in decreasing similarity order. This paper proposes an alternative to this greedy choice based on a network flow algorithm providing an optimal result, according to the given similarity function. Furthermore, we study a generalization of this approach and we show the general case to be NP-complete. After a discussion on theoretical and practical use of the optimal method, we give some directions for further works.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信