模型检查跟踪事件结构

P. Madhusudan
{"title":"模型检查跟踪事件结构","authors":"P. Madhusudan","doi":"10.1109/LICS.2003.1210077","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given regular collection of Mazurkiewicz traces, which can be seen as the behaviors of a finite-state concurrent system, one can associate with it a canonical regular event structure. This event structure is a single (often infinite) structure that captures both the concurrency and conflict information present in the system. We study the problem of model-checking such structures against logics such as first-order logic (FOL), monadic second-order logic (MSOL) and a new logic that lies in between these two called monadic trace logic (MTL). MTL is a fragment of MSOL where the quantification is restricted to sets that are conflict-free. While it is known that model-checking such event structures against MSOL is undecidable, our main results are that FOL and MTL admit effective model-checking procedures. It turns out that FOL captures previously known decidable temporal logics on event structures. MTL is more powerful and can express interesting branching-time properties of event structures, and when restricted to a sequential setting, can express the standard logic CTL over trees.","PeriodicalId":280809,"journal":{"name":"18th Annual IEEE Symposium of Logic in Computer Science, 2003. Proceedings.","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-06-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"30","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Model-checking trace event structures\",\"authors\":\"P. Madhusudan\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/LICS.2003.1210077\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Given regular collection of Mazurkiewicz traces, which can be seen as the behaviors of a finite-state concurrent system, one can associate with it a canonical regular event structure. This event structure is a single (often infinite) structure that captures both the concurrency and conflict information present in the system. We study the problem of model-checking such structures against logics such as first-order logic (FOL), monadic second-order logic (MSOL) and a new logic that lies in between these two called monadic trace logic (MTL). MTL is a fragment of MSOL where the quantification is restricted to sets that are conflict-free. While it is known that model-checking such event structures against MSOL is undecidable, our main results are that FOL and MTL admit effective model-checking procedures. It turns out that FOL captures previously known decidable temporal logics on event structures. MTL is more powerful and can express interesting branching-time properties of event structures, and when restricted to a sequential setting, can express the standard logic CTL over trees.\",\"PeriodicalId\":280809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"18th Annual IEEE Symposium of Logic in Computer Science, 2003. Proceedings.\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-06-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"30\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"18th Annual IEEE Symposium of Logic in Computer Science, 2003. Proceedings.\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.2003.1210077\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"18th Annual IEEE Symposium of Logic in Computer Science, 2003. Proceedings.","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/LICS.2003.1210077","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 30

摘要

给定Mazurkiewicz轨迹的规则集合(可以看作是有限状态并发系统的行为),可以将其与规范的规则事件结构相关联。这个事件结构是一个单一的(通常是无限的)结构,它捕获系统中存在的并发性和冲突信息。我们研究了针对一阶逻辑(FOL)、一元二阶逻辑(MSOL)以及介于两者之间的一元跟踪逻辑(MTL)等逻辑的模型检查问题。MTL是MSOL的一个片段,其中量化仅限于无冲突的集合。虽然已知针对MSOL对此类事件结构进行模型检查是不可确定的,但我们的主要结果是FOL和MTL承认有效的模型检查过程。事实证明,FOL捕获了先前已知的事件结构上的可决定时间逻辑。MTL功能更强大,可以表达事件结构有趣的分支时间属性,并且当限制为顺序设置时,可以表示树上的标准逻辑CTL。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Model-checking trace event structures
Given regular collection of Mazurkiewicz traces, which can be seen as the behaviors of a finite-state concurrent system, one can associate with it a canonical regular event structure. This event structure is a single (often infinite) structure that captures both the concurrency and conflict information present in the system. We study the problem of model-checking such structures against logics such as first-order logic (FOL), monadic second-order logic (MSOL) and a new logic that lies in between these two called monadic trace logic (MTL). MTL is a fragment of MSOL where the quantification is restricted to sets that are conflict-free. While it is known that model-checking such event structures against MSOL is undecidable, our main results are that FOL and MTL admit effective model-checking procedures. It turns out that FOL captures previously known decidable temporal logics on event structures. MTL is more powerful and can express interesting branching-time properties of event structures, and when restricted to a sequential setting, can express the standard logic CTL over trees.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信