{"title":"历史信息在圣训内容批判中的应用","authors":"Mir Sadeq Ansari","doi":"10.55831/ajis.v5i3.301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Rejecting ḥadīth based on it contradicting with known historical events has been deemed an accepted principle of matncriticism amongst classical ḥadīth scholars. How exactly is this rule meant to be applied is the question that this paper attempts to address by looking at how Abu Jaʿfar al-Ṭaḥāwī applied it throughout his magnum corpus - Sharḥ mushkil al-āthār. Of the fourteen examples selected from the fifteen-volume work, it can be seen that Ṭaḥāwī often uses this principle to reject what would normally be deemed very authentic ḥadīth. However, when the ḥadīth at hand is ‘raised’, that is it is a prophetic ḥadīth (marfūʿ), we find Ṭaḥāwī exercising flexible hermeneutical skills and defending the ḥadīth.","PeriodicalId":178428,"journal":{"name":"Australian Journal of Islamic Studies","volume":"45 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Use of Historical Information in Conducting Content Criticism in Hadith\",\"authors\":\"Mir Sadeq Ansari\",\"doi\":\"10.55831/ajis.v5i3.301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Rejecting ḥadīth based on it contradicting with known historical events has been deemed an accepted principle of matncriticism amongst classical ḥadīth scholars. How exactly is this rule meant to be applied is the question that this paper attempts to address by looking at how Abu Jaʿfar al-Ṭaḥāwī applied it throughout his magnum corpus - Sharḥ mushkil al-āthār. Of the fourteen examples selected from the fifteen-volume work, it can be seen that Ṭaḥāwī often uses this principle to reject what would normally be deemed very authentic ḥadīth. However, when the ḥadīth at hand is ‘raised’, that is it is a prophetic ḥadīth (marfūʿ), we find Ṭaḥāwī exercising flexible hermeneutical skills and defending the ḥadīth.\",\"PeriodicalId\":178428,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Australian Journal of Islamic Studies\",\"volume\":\"45 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Australian Journal of Islamic Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.55831/ajis.v5i3.301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Journal of Islamic Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.55831/ajis.v5i3.301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
因为与已知的历史事件相矛盾而拒绝ḥadīth,这在古典ḥadīth学者中被认为是一种公认的批判原则。这条规则究竟应该如何应用,这是本文试图通过考察Abu Ja - al- far al-Ṭaḥāwī如何在他的文集sharghamushkil al- -āthār中应用这条规则来解决的问题。从15卷的作品中选择的14个例子中,可以看出Ṭaḥāwī经常使用这一原则来拒绝通常被认为是非常真实的ḥadīth。然而,当手中的ḥadīth被“举起”时,也就是说,它是一个预言性的ḥadīth (marfki - yi),我们发现Ṭaḥāwī运用灵活的解释学技巧,捍卫ḥadīth。
Use of Historical Information in Conducting Content Criticism in Hadith
Rejecting ḥadīth based on it contradicting with known historical events has been deemed an accepted principle of matncriticism amongst classical ḥadīth scholars. How exactly is this rule meant to be applied is the question that this paper attempts to address by looking at how Abu Jaʿfar al-Ṭaḥāwī applied it throughout his magnum corpus - Sharḥ mushkil al-āthār. Of the fourteen examples selected from the fifteen-volume work, it can be seen that Ṭaḥāwī often uses this principle to reject what would normally be deemed very authentic ḥadīth. However, when the ḥadīth at hand is ‘raised’, that is it is a prophetic ḥadīth (marfūʿ), we find Ṭaḥāwī exercising flexible hermeneutical skills and defending the ḥadīth.