土地利用精细制图开源数据的定量比较

Xueqing Deng, S. Newsam
{"title":"土地利用精细制图开源数据的定量比较","authors":"Xueqing Deng, S. Newsam","doi":"10.1145/3152178.3152182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper performs a quantitative comparison of open-source data available on the Internet for the fine-grain mapping of land use. Three points of interest (POI) data sources--Google Places, Bing Maps, and the Yellow Pages--and one volunteered geographic information data source--Open Street Map (OSM)--are compared with each other at the parcel level for San Francisco with respect to a proposed fine-grain land-use taxonomy. The sources are also compared to coarse-grain authoritative data which we consider to be the ground truth. Results show limited agreement among the data sources as well as limited accuracy with respect to the authoritative data even at coarse class granularity. We conclude that POI and OSM data do not appear to be sufficient alone for fine-grain land-use mapping.","PeriodicalId":378940,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Smart Cities and Urban Analytics","volume":"1100 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-11-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"13","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Quantitative Comparison of Open-Source Data for Fine-Grain Mapping of Land Use\",\"authors\":\"Xueqing Deng, S. Newsam\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/3152178.3152182\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper performs a quantitative comparison of open-source data available on the Internet for the fine-grain mapping of land use. Three points of interest (POI) data sources--Google Places, Bing Maps, and the Yellow Pages--and one volunteered geographic information data source--Open Street Map (OSM)--are compared with each other at the parcel level for San Francisco with respect to a proposed fine-grain land-use taxonomy. The sources are also compared to coarse-grain authoritative data which we consider to be the ground truth. Results show limited agreement among the data sources as well as limited accuracy with respect to the authoritative data even at coarse class granularity. We conclude that POI and OSM data do not appear to be sufficient alone for fine-grain land-use mapping.\",\"PeriodicalId\":378940,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Smart Cities and Urban Analytics\",\"volume\":\"1100 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-11-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"13\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Smart Cities and Urban Analytics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/3152178.3152182\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 3rd ACM SIGSPATIAL Workshop on Smart Cities and Urban Analytics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/3152178.3152182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 13

摘要

本文对互联网上可获得的用于土地利用精细制图的开源数据进行了定量比较。三个兴趣点(POI)数据源——Google Places、Bing Maps和黄页——和一个自愿提供的地理信息数据源——开放街道地图(Open Street Map, OSM)——根据提议的细粒度土地利用分类法,在旧金山的地块级别上相互比较。我们还将这些来源与粗粒度的权威数据进行了比较,我们认为粗粒度的权威数据是真实的。结果表明,即使在粗类粒度下,数据源之间的一致性有限,并且相对于权威数据的准确性有限。我们得出结论,POI和OSM数据似乎不足以单独用于细粒度土地利用制图。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Quantitative Comparison of Open-Source Data for Fine-Grain Mapping of Land Use
This paper performs a quantitative comparison of open-source data available on the Internet for the fine-grain mapping of land use. Three points of interest (POI) data sources--Google Places, Bing Maps, and the Yellow Pages--and one volunteered geographic information data source--Open Street Map (OSM)--are compared with each other at the parcel level for San Francisco with respect to a proposed fine-grain land-use taxonomy. The sources are also compared to coarse-grain authoritative data which we consider to be the ground truth. Results show limited agreement among the data sources as well as limited accuracy with respect to the authoritative data even at coarse class granularity. We conclude that POI and OSM data do not appear to be sufficient alone for fine-grain land-use mapping.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信