专家系统货币下小组调查法与头脑风暴法对学生学习效果的有效性研究

M. Ihsan, K. Rukun, F. Rizal, M. Ramadhan
{"title":"专家系统货币下小组调查法与头脑风暴法对学生学习效果的有效性研究","authors":"M. Ihsan, K. Rukun, F. Rizal, M. Ramadhan","doi":"10.2991/ICTVET-18.2019.47","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to (1) know the results of student learning using the group survey method (2) know the results of student learning using the brainstorming method (3) know the difference between the learning outcomes of students using Group Investigation research methods and brainstorming in courses on expert systems. The population of this research includes the students of the fourth semester of STMIK Amik Logika Medan's IT department, ie 134 students divided into 4 classes. The sample of this study is followed by 2 classes of classes A and B composed of 36 B composed of 34 students. The sampling in this study was conducted using a cluster sampling technique in which one class is treated with the group search method and the other class with a brainstorming method. Based on the above calculation, there is a significant difference from the student's learning outcomes in the expert system course methods for research methods and brainstorming, the learning outcomes using the upper group method. The results of the mean post-test using the group survey are 80.14 and the results after the test with the average brainstorming 77.94. Keywords—results of student learning; group investigation method; brainstorming method","PeriodicalId":339218,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 5th UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (ICTVET 2018)","volume":"2 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effectiveness of Student Learning Results using Group Investigation Method and Brainstorming on Expert System Currency\",\"authors\":\"M. Ihsan, K. Rukun, F. Rizal, M. Ramadhan\",\"doi\":\"10.2991/ICTVET-18.2019.47\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to (1) know the results of student learning using the group survey method (2) know the results of student learning using the brainstorming method (3) know the difference between the learning outcomes of students using Group Investigation research methods and brainstorming in courses on expert systems. The population of this research includes the students of the fourth semester of STMIK Amik Logika Medan's IT department, ie 134 students divided into 4 classes. The sample of this study is followed by 2 classes of classes A and B composed of 36 B composed of 34 students. The sampling in this study was conducted using a cluster sampling technique in which one class is treated with the group search method and the other class with a brainstorming method. Based on the above calculation, there is a significant difference from the student's learning outcomes in the expert system course methods for research methods and brainstorming, the learning outcomes using the upper group method. The results of the mean post-test using the group survey are 80.14 and the results after the test with the average brainstorming 77.94. Keywords—results of student learning; group investigation method; brainstorming method\",\"PeriodicalId\":339218,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 5th UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (ICTVET 2018)\",\"volume\":\"2 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 5th UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (ICTVET 2018)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2991/ICTVET-18.2019.47\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 5th UPI International Conference on Technical and Vocational Education and Training (ICTVET 2018)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2991/ICTVET-18.2019.47","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在(1)使用小组调查法了解学生学习的结果(2)使用头脑风暴法了解学生学习的结果(3)了解在专家系统课程中使用小组调查研究方法和头脑风暴方法的学生学习结果的区别。本研究的人群包括STMIK Amik Logika Medan IT系第四学期的学生,即134名学生,分为4个班。本研究的样本依次为A班和B班2个班,共36个班,B班共34名学生。本研究的抽样采用整群抽样技术,其中一个班级采用群体搜索法,另一个班级采用头脑风暴法。基于以上计算,采用专家系统课程方法的学生的学习成果与采用研究法和头脑风暴法的学生的学习成果存在显著差异,采用上组法的学生的学习成果存在显著差异。小组调查后测均值为80.14,头脑风暴后测均值为77.94。关键词:学生学习效果;小组调查法;头脑风暴法
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Effectiveness of Student Learning Results using Group Investigation Method and Brainstorming on Expert System Currency
This study aims to (1) know the results of student learning using the group survey method (2) know the results of student learning using the brainstorming method (3) know the difference between the learning outcomes of students using Group Investigation research methods and brainstorming in courses on expert systems. The population of this research includes the students of the fourth semester of STMIK Amik Logika Medan's IT department, ie 134 students divided into 4 classes. The sample of this study is followed by 2 classes of classes A and B composed of 36 B composed of 34 students. The sampling in this study was conducted using a cluster sampling technique in which one class is treated with the group search method and the other class with a brainstorming method. Based on the above calculation, there is a significant difference from the student's learning outcomes in the expert system course methods for research methods and brainstorming, the learning outcomes using the upper group method. The results of the mean post-test using the group survey are 80.14 and the results after the test with the average brainstorming 77.94. Keywords—results of student learning; group investigation method; brainstorming method
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信