{"title":"《法律与经济学》对公共采购中的选择方式和市场优势的批判性评述","authors":"Monica Sofia Safar Diaz","doi":"10.32457/rjyd.v5i2.2027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The premise of this article revolves around considering whether the procedures for choosing future public administration collaborators should be the result of plural and open process. That is, through the market. This is so that the greatest number of offers can be presented, and that it is precisely this openness that results in the indeterminacy of the number of participants that will make each one of them strive to present the best offer. Therefore, based on the incorporation of some precepts of Law & Economics, this article aims to defend a position that is understood as socially efficient.","PeriodicalId":309029,"journal":{"name":"Justicia &Derecho","volume":"43 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A critical review from Law & Economics of selection modalities and market advantages in public procurement\",\"authors\":\"Monica Sofia Safar Diaz\",\"doi\":\"10.32457/rjyd.v5i2.2027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The premise of this article revolves around considering whether the procedures for choosing future public administration collaborators should be the result of plural and open process. That is, through the market. This is so that the greatest number of offers can be presented, and that it is precisely this openness that results in the indeterminacy of the number of participants that will make each one of them strive to present the best offer. Therefore, based on the incorporation of some precepts of Law & Economics, this article aims to defend a position that is understood as socially efficient.\",\"PeriodicalId\":309029,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Justicia &Derecho\",\"volume\":\"43 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Justicia &Derecho\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32457/rjyd.v5i2.2027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Justicia &Derecho","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32457/rjyd.v5i2.2027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
A critical review from Law & Economics of selection modalities and market advantages in public procurement
The premise of this article revolves around considering whether the procedures for choosing future public administration collaborators should be the result of plural and open process. That is, through the market. This is so that the greatest number of offers can be presented, and that it is precisely this openness that results in the indeterminacy of the number of participants that will make each one of them strive to present the best offer. Therefore, based on the incorporation of some precepts of Law & Economics, this article aims to defend a position that is understood as socially efficient.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
