天课公开水平的决定因素:印度尼西亚的证据

H. Kusuma
{"title":"天课公开水平的决定因素:印度尼西亚的证据","authors":"H. Kusuma","doi":"10.25272/ijisef.583662","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Accounting standard regulates the critical points of zakah disclosure in Islamic banking, but the voluntary disclosure has not been conducted by Islamic Banks. The determinants of zakah disclosure level for those banks are important to consider because zakah management in Indonesia has not been conducted optimally. Unfortunately, previous studies have not investigated the issue. This study has two objectives: to evaluate zakah disclosure level in Islamic Banks in Indonesia and to analyze the determinants of zakah disclosure level. This study measured the Shariah Supervisory Board using Islamic Governance (IG)-Score and the proportion of the Investment Account Holder (IAH) funds. The model then was controlled by the variables of bank size and leverage. The IG-score was measured using five indicators: the existence of SSB, the number of SSB members, cross-memberships, doctoral qualification of SSB members, and reputable scholars on SSB. The population was all public Islamic Banks in Indonesia, and the samples were collected using purposive sampling from the annual reports of the banks in the period of 2012-2016. Regression analysis and t-test were conducted to test the hypotheses and zakah disclosure level before and after revised PSAK 101 in 2014. The result of this study indicated that the zakah disclosure level of the Islamic banks was quite high with an average of 67%. Most of the disclosures were still limited to the existing rules required (mandatory disclosures). The t-test result indicated that zakah disclosure levels of 2014 and 2015 (implementation of revised PSAK 101 in 2014) were significantly different. As an interesting point, both Shariah Supervisory Board and the proportion of Investment Account Holder (IAH) funds significantly improved zakah disclosure level.","PeriodicalId":136568,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies","volume":"39 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"DETERMINANTS OF ZAKAH DISCLOSURE LEVEL: EVIDENCE FOR INDONESIA\",\"authors\":\"H. Kusuma\",\"doi\":\"10.25272/ijisef.583662\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Accounting standard regulates the critical points of zakah disclosure in Islamic banking, but the voluntary disclosure has not been conducted by Islamic Banks. The determinants of zakah disclosure level for those banks are important to consider because zakah management in Indonesia has not been conducted optimally. Unfortunately, previous studies have not investigated the issue. This study has two objectives: to evaluate zakah disclosure level in Islamic Banks in Indonesia and to analyze the determinants of zakah disclosure level. This study measured the Shariah Supervisory Board using Islamic Governance (IG)-Score and the proportion of the Investment Account Holder (IAH) funds. The model then was controlled by the variables of bank size and leverage. The IG-score was measured using five indicators: the existence of SSB, the number of SSB members, cross-memberships, doctoral qualification of SSB members, and reputable scholars on SSB. The population was all public Islamic Banks in Indonesia, and the samples were collected using purposive sampling from the annual reports of the banks in the period of 2012-2016. Regression analysis and t-test were conducted to test the hypotheses and zakah disclosure level before and after revised PSAK 101 in 2014. The result of this study indicated that the zakah disclosure level of the Islamic banks was quite high with an average of 67%. Most of the disclosures were still limited to the existing rules required (mandatory disclosures). The t-test result indicated that zakah disclosure levels of 2014 and 2015 (implementation of revised PSAK 101 in 2014) were significantly different. As an interesting point, both Shariah Supervisory Board and the proportion of Investment Account Holder (IAH) funds significantly improved zakah disclosure level.\",\"PeriodicalId\":136568,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-11-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.25272/ijisef.583662\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Islamic Economics and Finance Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.25272/ijisef.583662","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

会计准则规定了伊斯兰银行天课披露的关键点,但伊斯兰银行尚未进行自愿披露。这些银行天课披露水平的决定因素值得考虑,因为印尼的天课管理尚未达到最佳状态。不幸的是,以前的研究并没有调查这个问题。本研究有两个目的:评估印尼伊斯兰银行的天课披露水平,分析天课披露水平的决定因素。本研究使用伊斯兰治理(IG)评分和投资账户持有人(IAH)资金的比例来衡量伊斯兰教法监事会。然后,模型由银行规模和杠杆变量控制。IG-score采用五个指标来衡量:SSB的存在、SSB成员的数量、交叉成员、SSB成员的博士资格、SSB知名学者。人口为印度尼西亚的所有公共伊斯兰银行,样本采用2012-2016年银行年度报告中的有目的抽样收集。采用回归分析和t检验对2014年PSAK 101修订前后的假设和天课披露水平进行检验。本研究结果表明,伊斯兰银行的天卡披露水平相当高,平均为67%。大多数披露仍然局限于现有的规则要求(强制性披露)。t检验结果显示,2014年和2015年(2014年实施修订后的PSAK 101)天课披露水平存在显著差异。有趣的是,伊斯兰教法监事会和投资账户持有人(IAH)资金的比例都显著提高了天课披露水平。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
DETERMINANTS OF ZAKAH DISCLOSURE LEVEL: EVIDENCE FOR INDONESIA
Accounting standard regulates the critical points of zakah disclosure in Islamic banking, but the voluntary disclosure has not been conducted by Islamic Banks. The determinants of zakah disclosure level for those banks are important to consider because zakah management in Indonesia has not been conducted optimally. Unfortunately, previous studies have not investigated the issue. This study has two objectives: to evaluate zakah disclosure level in Islamic Banks in Indonesia and to analyze the determinants of zakah disclosure level. This study measured the Shariah Supervisory Board using Islamic Governance (IG)-Score and the proportion of the Investment Account Holder (IAH) funds. The model then was controlled by the variables of bank size and leverage. The IG-score was measured using five indicators: the existence of SSB, the number of SSB members, cross-memberships, doctoral qualification of SSB members, and reputable scholars on SSB. The population was all public Islamic Banks in Indonesia, and the samples were collected using purposive sampling from the annual reports of the banks in the period of 2012-2016. Regression analysis and t-test were conducted to test the hypotheses and zakah disclosure level before and after revised PSAK 101 in 2014. The result of this study indicated that the zakah disclosure level of the Islamic banks was quite high with an average of 67%. Most of the disclosures were still limited to the existing rules required (mandatory disclosures). The t-test result indicated that zakah disclosure levels of 2014 and 2015 (implementation of revised PSAK 101 in 2014) were significantly different. As an interesting point, both Shariah Supervisory Board and the proportion of Investment Account Holder (IAH) funds significantly improved zakah disclosure level.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信