再现集体学习:一种生成式的前进方式

L. Forsyth, L. Schaverien
{"title":"再现集体学习:一种生成式的前进方式","authors":"L. Forsyth, L. Schaverien","doi":"10.1145/1052829.1052836","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Professional development is increasingly conceived as a sustained group or community process, often supported by online technologies. Yet despite the enthusiasm for online communities of practice [40], and the innovative educational contexts being developed to support them, the reality of developing and maintaining a critical mass of teacher engagement is proving to be challenging (for example, the Inquiry Learning Forum (ILF) [4]; the Hawaii Networked Learning Communities (HNLC) [37]). Teacher educators and designers of technological learning environments continually strive to maximize the value of teacher engagement in such contexts, yet the conditions under which social learning and collaboration become an appropriate strategy for teachers remain unclear [4; 19]. Furthermore, contemporary research from evolutionary psychology [27] and modeling of cultural transmission [5] suggests the likelihood that professional development in sustained groups would involve subtle yet influential social learning strategies. For example, decisions regarding the adequacy of a particular concept or professional behavior may be influenced by the status of the group member advocating it, the frequency of the behavior in the group, or even which idea or behavior was offered to the group first [1].","PeriodicalId":390207,"journal":{"name":"ACM Siggroup Bulletin","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2003-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Re-presenting collective learning: a generative way forward\",\"authors\":\"L. Forsyth, L. Schaverien\",\"doi\":\"10.1145/1052829.1052836\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Professional development is increasingly conceived as a sustained group or community process, often supported by online technologies. Yet despite the enthusiasm for online communities of practice [40], and the innovative educational contexts being developed to support them, the reality of developing and maintaining a critical mass of teacher engagement is proving to be challenging (for example, the Inquiry Learning Forum (ILF) [4]; the Hawaii Networked Learning Communities (HNLC) [37]). Teacher educators and designers of technological learning environments continually strive to maximize the value of teacher engagement in such contexts, yet the conditions under which social learning and collaboration become an appropriate strategy for teachers remain unclear [4; 19]. Furthermore, contemporary research from evolutionary psychology [27] and modeling of cultural transmission [5] suggests the likelihood that professional development in sustained groups would involve subtle yet influential social learning strategies. For example, decisions regarding the adequacy of a particular concept or professional behavior may be influenced by the status of the group member advocating it, the frequency of the behavior in the group, or even which idea or behavior was offered to the group first [1].\",\"PeriodicalId\":390207,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACM Siggroup Bulletin\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2003-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACM Siggroup Bulletin\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1145/1052829.1052836\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACM Siggroup Bulletin","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1145/1052829.1052836","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

专业发展越来越被认为是一个持续的团体或社区过程,通常由在线技术支持。然而,尽管人们对在线实践社区[4]充满热情,并且正在开发创新的教育环境来支持他们,但发展和维持教师参与的临界质量的现实被证明是具有挑战性的(例如,研究性学习论坛(ILF) [4];夏威夷网络学习社区(HNLC) b[37])。教师教育工作者和技术学习环境的设计者不断努力使教师参与的价值最大化,然而,社会学习和协作成为教师适当策略的条件仍不清楚[4];19)。此外,来自进化心理学和文化传播模型的当代研究表明,可持续群体的职业发展可能涉及微妙但有影响力的社会学习策略。例如,关于某一特定概念或专业行为是否适当的决定可能受到倡导该概念或专业行为的小组成员地位、该行为在小组中出现的频率,甚至是最先向小组提出的想法或行为的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Re-presenting collective learning: a generative way forward
Professional development is increasingly conceived as a sustained group or community process, often supported by online technologies. Yet despite the enthusiasm for online communities of practice [40], and the innovative educational contexts being developed to support them, the reality of developing and maintaining a critical mass of teacher engagement is proving to be challenging (for example, the Inquiry Learning Forum (ILF) [4]; the Hawaii Networked Learning Communities (HNLC) [37]). Teacher educators and designers of technological learning environments continually strive to maximize the value of teacher engagement in such contexts, yet the conditions under which social learning and collaboration become an appropriate strategy for teachers remain unclear [4; 19]. Furthermore, contemporary research from evolutionary psychology [27] and modeling of cultural transmission [5] suggests the likelihood that professional development in sustained groups would involve subtle yet influential social learning strategies. For example, decisions regarding the adequacy of a particular concept or professional behavior may be influenced by the status of the group member advocating it, the frequency of the behavior in the group, or even which idea or behavior was offered to the group first [1].
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信