模糊评价方法

I. Subbotin, M. Voskoglou
{"title":"模糊评价方法","authors":"I. Subbotin, M. Voskoglou","doi":"10.13189/UJAM.2014.020902","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Fuzzy logic due to its nature of characterizing each case with multiple values offers is a rich field of resources covering the assessment of situations characterized by a degree of fuzziness and/or uncertainty. In this paper, we present two different fuzzy assessment models: The Centre of Gravity (COG) model and Trapezoidal Fuzzy Assessment Model (TRFAM). The last one is a new model covering the ambiguous cases being at the boundaries between two successive assessment intervals. An application (students' assessment) is also presented, through which the above methods are compared to each other and also with two traditional assessment methods based on principles of bivalent logic (the calculation of means and of the GPA index). Some useful conclusions are drawn about the characteristics of the above fuzzy assessment models.","PeriodicalId":372283,"journal":{"name":"Universal Journal of Applied Mathematics","volume":"7 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"1900-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"8","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Fuzzy Assessment Methods\",\"authors\":\"I. Subbotin, M. Voskoglou\",\"doi\":\"10.13189/UJAM.2014.020902\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Fuzzy logic due to its nature of characterizing each case with multiple values offers is a rich field of resources covering the assessment of situations characterized by a degree of fuzziness and/or uncertainty. In this paper, we present two different fuzzy assessment models: The Centre of Gravity (COG) model and Trapezoidal Fuzzy Assessment Model (TRFAM). The last one is a new model covering the ambiguous cases being at the boundaries between two successive assessment intervals. An application (students' assessment) is also presented, through which the above methods are compared to each other and also with two traditional assessment methods based on principles of bivalent logic (the calculation of means and of the GPA index). Some useful conclusions are drawn about the characteristics of the above fuzzy assessment models.\",\"PeriodicalId\":372283,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Universal Journal of Applied Mathematics\",\"volume\":\"7 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"1900-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"8\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Universal Journal of Applied Mathematics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.13189/UJAM.2014.020902\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Universal Journal of Applied Mathematics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.13189/UJAM.2014.020902","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 8

摘要

模糊逻辑是一个资源丰富的领域,它涵盖了对具有一定程度的模糊性和/或不确定性的情况的评估。本文提出了两种不同的模糊评价模型:重心模型(COG)和梯形模糊评价模型(TRFAM)。最后一个是一个新的模型,涵盖了两个连续评估区间之间的模糊情况。最后给出了一个应用(学生评价),通过对上述方法进行对比,并与基于二值逻辑原理的两种传统评价方法(均值计算和GPA指数计算)进行比较。对上述模糊评价模型的特点得出了一些有益的结论。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Fuzzy Assessment Methods
Fuzzy logic due to its nature of characterizing each case with multiple values offers is a rich field of resources covering the assessment of situations characterized by a degree of fuzziness and/or uncertainty. In this paper, we present two different fuzzy assessment models: The Centre of Gravity (COG) model and Trapezoidal Fuzzy Assessment Model (TRFAM). The last one is a new model covering the ambiguous cases being at the boundaries between two successive assessment intervals. An application (students' assessment) is also presented, through which the above methods are compared to each other and also with two traditional assessment methods based on principles of bivalent logic (the calculation of means and of the GPA index). Some useful conclusions are drawn about the characteristics of the above fuzzy assessment models.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信