高校在线评估的完整性:面向功能模型的构建

Stella Muchemwa
{"title":"高校在线评估的完整性:面向功能模型的构建","authors":"Stella Muchemwa","doi":"10.56773/ejer.v1i2.8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This world is changing and the old education operation system is no longer compatible with these vicissitudes. Online assessment, that has been enforced by the COVID 19 pandemic and has become a norm in many universities world-wide, is failing to embrace all leaners, thus the need to address it. This content analysis study examined the integrity of online university assessments based on 2020 and 2021 online studies purposively selected from the internet. The researcher used Motivation Theory, Technology Acceptance Model and Self-efficacy Theory whose concepts are key in the changes that this study calls for. Findings revealed two basic operational types of online university assessments: the digitally proctored examinations and the open-access assessment. While affluent nations have smoother transitions and more benefits, developing nations are challenged by students online cheating and resource unavailability. The study concluded that some universities are hesitant to adopt online assessment systems due to lack of awareness, resistant to change and fear of losing examination integrity. The study therefore recommends universities to hold online assessment workshops to equip both the lecturers and the learners. Detecting cheating software can be used to detect students cheating and expenses can be averted by using free online examination software. They can also use Chromebooks for student assessment which can be setup to disable access to browse the web and the external storage during an examination. Above all, a reliable, authentic and cost-effective online assessment model with minimal disruptions, which ensures that no student is left behind, is a necessity.","PeriodicalId":130109,"journal":{"name":"Eureka: Journal of Educational Research","volume":"80 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrity of university online assessment: Towards developing a function model\",\"authors\":\"Stella Muchemwa\",\"doi\":\"10.56773/ejer.v1i2.8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This world is changing and the old education operation system is no longer compatible with these vicissitudes. Online assessment, that has been enforced by the COVID 19 pandemic and has become a norm in many universities world-wide, is failing to embrace all leaners, thus the need to address it. This content analysis study examined the integrity of online university assessments based on 2020 and 2021 online studies purposively selected from the internet. The researcher used Motivation Theory, Technology Acceptance Model and Self-efficacy Theory whose concepts are key in the changes that this study calls for. Findings revealed two basic operational types of online university assessments: the digitally proctored examinations and the open-access assessment. While affluent nations have smoother transitions and more benefits, developing nations are challenged by students online cheating and resource unavailability. The study concluded that some universities are hesitant to adopt online assessment systems due to lack of awareness, resistant to change and fear of losing examination integrity. The study therefore recommends universities to hold online assessment workshops to equip both the lecturers and the learners. Detecting cheating software can be used to detect students cheating and expenses can be averted by using free online examination software. They can also use Chromebooks for student assessment which can be setup to disable access to browse the web and the external storage during an examination. Above all, a reliable, authentic and cost-effective online assessment model with minimal disruptions, which ensures that no student is left behind, is a necessity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":130109,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Eureka: Journal of Educational Research\",\"volume\":\"80 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Eureka: Journal of Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56773/ejer.v1i2.8\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Eureka: Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56773/ejer.v1i2.8","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

这个世界在变化,旧的教育运作体系已经不能适应这些变化。新冠肺炎疫情期间实施的在线评估已成为全球许多大学的一种常态,但它未能接受所有学习者,因此有必要解决这一问题。本内容分析研究基于有意从互联网中选择的2020年和2021年在线研究,检查了在线大学评估的完整性。研究者运用了动机理论、技术接受模型和自我效能理论,这些理论的概念是本研究所要求的变革的关键。调查结果揭示了在线大学评估的两种基本操作类型:数字监考考试和开放获取评估。富裕国家的转型更平稳,受益更多,而发展中国家则面临着学生在线作弊和资源不可用的挑战。该研究得出的结论是,一些大学对采用在线评估系统犹豫不决,原因是缺乏意识,抵制变革,担心失去考试的完整性。因此,该研究建议大学举办在线评估研讨会,以装备讲师和学习者。检测作弊软件可以用来检测学生的作弊行为,使用免费的在线考试软件可以避免费用。他们还可以使用chromebook进行学生评估,可以设置为在考试期间禁用浏览网页和外部存储。最重要的是,一个可靠的、真实的、具有成本效益的、干扰最小的在线评估模式是必要的,这可以确保没有一个学生掉队。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Integrity of university online assessment: Towards developing a function model
This world is changing and the old education operation system is no longer compatible with these vicissitudes. Online assessment, that has been enforced by the COVID 19 pandemic and has become a norm in many universities world-wide, is failing to embrace all leaners, thus the need to address it. This content analysis study examined the integrity of online university assessments based on 2020 and 2021 online studies purposively selected from the internet. The researcher used Motivation Theory, Technology Acceptance Model and Self-efficacy Theory whose concepts are key in the changes that this study calls for. Findings revealed two basic operational types of online university assessments: the digitally proctored examinations and the open-access assessment. While affluent nations have smoother transitions and more benefits, developing nations are challenged by students online cheating and resource unavailability. The study concluded that some universities are hesitant to adopt online assessment systems due to lack of awareness, resistant to change and fear of losing examination integrity. The study therefore recommends universities to hold online assessment workshops to equip both the lecturers and the learners. Detecting cheating software can be used to detect students cheating and expenses can be averted by using free online examination software. They can also use Chromebooks for student assessment which can be setup to disable access to browse the web and the external storage during an examination. Above all, a reliable, authentic and cost-effective online assessment model with minimal disruptions, which ensures that no student is left behind, is a necessity.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信