PUPy:一种用于隐式认证的广义乐观上下文检测框架

Matthew Rafuse, U. Hengartner
{"title":"PUPy:一种用于隐式认证的广义乐观上下文检测框架","authors":"Matthew Rafuse, U. Hengartner","doi":"10.1109/PST52912.2021.9647739","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Devices like smartphones and laptops employ some form of user authentication to ensure that access to confidential data by the wrong user is avoided. Implicit authentication aims to limit the number of explicit authentications that a user is subjected to by using passive approaches to authenticate the user. Context detection frameworks aim to reduce explicit authentications by disabling explicit authentication entirely when appropriate. Since explicit and implicit authentication are not mutually exclusive, we can also use context detection frameworks to decide whether explicit or implicit authentication should be used when authentication is required. We present a novel context detection framework, PUPy, that uses sensed context data to infer and make available three values–privacy, unfamiliarity, and proximity–allowing clients of our framework, like authentication services, to better adapt to different contexts. As opposed to existing work, our context detection framework is based on an optimistic approach to context detection. Our assumption is that the absence of data, like the inability to detect nearby people or devices, can be taken as a sign that a context is safe. Such an optimistic approach may provide less security than a pessimistic approach, but provides a significantly improved user experience due to reducing the number of explicit authentications. We provide an Android implementation of the framework, including an API that allows other developers to contribute modules to the system. We also conduct a statistical analysis of our framework based on a large real-world dataset. We find that PUPy compares favourably to existing works, permitting a 77.2% reduction in the number of explicit authentications.","PeriodicalId":144610,"journal":{"name":"2021 18th International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST)","volume":"38 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"PUPy: A Generalized, Optimistic Context Detection Framework for Implicit Authentication\",\"authors\":\"Matthew Rafuse, U. Hengartner\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/PST52912.2021.9647739\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Devices like smartphones and laptops employ some form of user authentication to ensure that access to confidential data by the wrong user is avoided. Implicit authentication aims to limit the number of explicit authentications that a user is subjected to by using passive approaches to authenticate the user. Context detection frameworks aim to reduce explicit authentications by disabling explicit authentication entirely when appropriate. Since explicit and implicit authentication are not mutually exclusive, we can also use context detection frameworks to decide whether explicit or implicit authentication should be used when authentication is required. We present a novel context detection framework, PUPy, that uses sensed context data to infer and make available three values–privacy, unfamiliarity, and proximity–allowing clients of our framework, like authentication services, to better adapt to different contexts. As opposed to existing work, our context detection framework is based on an optimistic approach to context detection. Our assumption is that the absence of data, like the inability to detect nearby people or devices, can be taken as a sign that a context is safe. Such an optimistic approach may provide less security than a pessimistic approach, but provides a significantly improved user experience due to reducing the number of explicit authentications. We provide an Android implementation of the framework, including an API that allows other developers to contribute modules to the system. We also conduct a statistical analysis of our framework based on a large real-world dataset. We find that PUPy compares favourably to existing works, permitting a 77.2% reduction in the number of explicit authentications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":144610,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2021 18th International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST)\",\"volume\":\"38 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-12-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2021 18th International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/PST52912.2021.9647739\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2021 18th International Conference on Privacy, Security and Trust (PST)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/PST52912.2021.9647739","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

智能手机和笔记本电脑等设备采用某种形式的用户身份验证,以确保避免错误用户访问机密数据。隐式身份验证的目的是通过使用被动方法对用户进行身份验证,从而限制用户需要进行显式身份验证的次数。上下文检测框架旨在通过在适当的时候完全禁用显式身份验证来减少显式身份验证。由于显式和隐式身份验证不是互斥的,所以我们还可以使用上下文检测框架来决定在需要身份验证时应该使用显式身份验证还是隐式身份验证。我们提出了一个新的上下文检测框架PUPy,它使用感知到的上下文数据来推断并提供三个值——隐私、不熟悉和接近度——允许我们框架的客户端(如身份验证服务)更好地适应不同的上下文。与现有的工作相反,我们的上下文检测框架基于一种乐观的上下文检测方法。我们的假设是,数据的缺失,比如无法检测到附近的人或设备,可以被视为环境安全的标志。这种乐观方法提供的安全性可能不如悲观方法,但由于减少了显式身份验证的数量,因此可以显著改善用户体验。我们提供了该框架的Android实现,包括允许其他开发人员向系统贡献模块的API。我们还对基于大型真实数据集的框架进行了统计分析。我们发现PUPy比现有的作品更有优势,允许显式认证数量减少77.2%。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
PUPy: A Generalized, Optimistic Context Detection Framework for Implicit Authentication
Devices like smartphones and laptops employ some form of user authentication to ensure that access to confidential data by the wrong user is avoided. Implicit authentication aims to limit the number of explicit authentications that a user is subjected to by using passive approaches to authenticate the user. Context detection frameworks aim to reduce explicit authentications by disabling explicit authentication entirely when appropriate. Since explicit and implicit authentication are not mutually exclusive, we can also use context detection frameworks to decide whether explicit or implicit authentication should be used when authentication is required. We present a novel context detection framework, PUPy, that uses sensed context data to infer and make available three values–privacy, unfamiliarity, and proximity–allowing clients of our framework, like authentication services, to better adapt to different contexts. As opposed to existing work, our context detection framework is based on an optimistic approach to context detection. Our assumption is that the absence of data, like the inability to detect nearby people or devices, can be taken as a sign that a context is safe. Such an optimistic approach may provide less security than a pessimistic approach, but provides a significantly improved user experience due to reducing the number of explicit authentications. We provide an Android implementation of the framework, including an API that allows other developers to contribute modules to the system. We also conduct a statistical analysis of our framework based on a large real-world dataset. We find that PUPy compares favourably to existing works, permitting a 77.2% reduction in the number of explicit authentications.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信