美国众筹的法律规制:一个有机发展的拼凑

Joan Macleod Heminway
{"title":"美国众筹的法律规制:一个有机发展的拼凑","authors":"Joan Macleod Heminway","doi":"10.2139/SSRN.3061552","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The legal regulation of crowdfunding in the United States is neither well calibrated nor holistic. With the exception of specific securities regulation legislation, the regulation of crowdfunding under U.S. law exists as an extension of principles of pre-existing regulation to a specific new and continually changing Internet-based financing space. As a result, while some common consumer protection objectives can be identified, the legal regulatory approach to crowdfunding did not develop through deliberate, rational choice based on coherent public policy objectives. Instead, it arose and evolved by necessity in response to the spontaneous and natural origination and development of crowdfunding as a socioeconomic phenomenon. \nAs a general matter, U.S. law regulates crowdfunding based on the deemed nature of the financial interest of the funder. Some funders expect nothing back in return for their contribution to a crowdfunding campaign; others expect a good, service, or possible financial return. Each of these funding interests is governed by distinct rules operating, most prominently, to protect the funder from certain elements of risk. Regulation of these various types of offering also may have the objective of fostering or encouraging that particular type of financial instrument or method of financing. Accordingly, it is important to identify various types of crowdfunding in the United States based on the nature of the applicable funding interest and the various manners in which crowdfunding is engaged to best understand how crowdfunding is regulated under U.S. law. \nThis report, written in anticipation of the The XXth International Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law (to be held in 2018 in Fukuoka, Japan), begins by identifying and defining types of crowdfunding that engage U.S. legal regulation. It continues by briefly describing the legal regulation applicable to each type. This represents the bulk of the report. Finally, before concluding, the report highlights a few additional legal regulatory risks and considerations in U.S. crowdfunding.","PeriodicalId":403916,"journal":{"name":"CGN: Finance (Topic)","volume":"41 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-10-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Legal Regulation of U.S. Crowdfunding: An Organically Evolving Patchwork\",\"authors\":\"Joan Macleod Heminway\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/SSRN.3061552\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The legal regulation of crowdfunding in the United States is neither well calibrated nor holistic. With the exception of specific securities regulation legislation, the regulation of crowdfunding under U.S. law exists as an extension of principles of pre-existing regulation to a specific new and continually changing Internet-based financing space. As a result, while some common consumer protection objectives can be identified, the legal regulatory approach to crowdfunding did not develop through deliberate, rational choice based on coherent public policy objectives. Instead, it arose and evolved by necessity in response to the spontaneous and natural origination and development of crowdfunding as a socioeconomic phenomenon. \\nAs a general matter, U.S. law regulates crowdfunding based on the deemed nature of the financial interest of the funder. Some funders expect nothing back in return for their contribution to a crowdfunding campaign; others expect a good, service, or possible financial return. Each of these funding interests is governed by distinct rules operating, most prominently, to protect the funder from certain elements of risk. Regulation of these various types of offering also may have the objective of fostering or encouraging that particular type of financial instrument or method of financing. Accordingly, it is important to identify various types of crowdfunding in the United States based on the nature of the applicable funding interest and the various manners in which crowdfunding is engaged to best understand how crowdfunding is regulated under U.S. law. \\nThis report, written in anticipation of the The XXth International Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law (to be held in 2018 in Fukuoka, Japan), begins by identifying and defining types of crowdfunding that engage U.S. legal regulation. It continues by briefly describing the legal regulation applicable to each type. This represents the bulk of the report. Finally, before concluding, the report highlights a few additional legal regulatory risks and considerations in U.S. crowdfunding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":403916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CGN: Finance (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-10-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CGN: Finance (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3061552\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CGN: Finance (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/SSRN.3061552","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

美国对众筹的法律监管既不准确,也不全面。除了具体的证券监管立法外,美国法律对众筹的监管是将已有的监管原则延伸到特定的、不断变化的互联网融资领域。因此,虽然可以确定一些共同的消费者保护目标,但对众筹的法律监管方法并没有通过基于连贯的公共政策目标的深思熟虑的理性选择而发展起来。相反,它的产生和演变是对众筹作为一种社会经济现象的自发和自然的起源和发展的必然回应。一般来说,美国法律对众筹的监管是基于资助者的经济利益的认定性质。一些出资人对众筹活动的贡献不期望任何回报;其他人则期望得到良好的服务或可能的经济回报。每一种融资利益都受到不同规则的约束,最重要的是保护出资者免受某些风险因素的影响。对这些不同类型的发行的监管也可能具有促进或鼓励特定类型的金融工具或融资方法的目的。因此,根据适用的融资利益的性质和众筹的各种方式来识别美国的各种众筹类型是很重要的,这样才能最好地理解众筹是如何受到美国法律的监管的。本报告是为了迎接国际比较法学会第20届国际大会(将于2018年在日本福冈举行)而撰写的,首先是识别和定义涉及美国法律监管的众筹类型。接着简要描述了适用于每种类型的法律法规。这代表了报告的大部分。最后,在结束之前,报告强调了美国众筹的一些额外的法律监管风险和注意事项。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Legal Regulation of U.S. Crowdfunding: An Organically Evolving Patchwork
The legal regulation of crowdfunding in the United States is neither well calibrated nor holistic. With the exception of specific securities regulation legislation, the regulation of crowdfunding under U.S. law exists as an extension of principles of pre-existing regulation to a specific new and continually changing Internet-based financing space. As a result, while some common consumer protection objectives can be identified, the legal regulatory approach to crowdfunding did not develop through deliberate, rational choice based on coherent public policy objectives. Instead, it arose and evolved by necessity in response to the spontaneous and natural origination and development of crowdfunding as a socioeconomic phenomenon. As a general matter, U.S. law regulates crowdfunding based on the deemed nature of the financial interest of the funder. Some funders expect nothing back in return for their contribution to a crowdfunding campaign; others expect a good, service, or possible financial return. Each of these funding interests is governed by distinct rules operating, most prominently, to protect the funder from certain elements of risk. Regulation of these various types of offering also may have the objective of fostering or encouraging that particular type of financial instrument or method of financing. Accordingly, it is important to identify various types of crowdfunding in the United States based on the nature of the applicable funding interest and the various manners in which crowdfunding is engaged to best understand how crowdfunding is regulated under U.S. law. This report, written in anticipation of the The XXth International Congress of the International Academy of Comparative Law (to be held in 2018 in Fukuoka, Japan), begins by identifying and defining types of crowdfunding that engage U.S. legal regulation. It continues by briefly describing the legal regulation applicable to each type. This represents the bulk of the report. Finally, before concluding, the report highlights a few additional legal regulatory risks and considerations in U.S. crowdfunding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信