位移光学测量跟踪标记适用性的比较

Luboš Kotek, Michal Holub, J. Vetiška, Kamil Subrt, Zdenek Hadaa, P. Blecha
{"title":"位移光学测量跟踪标记适用性的比较","authors":"Luboš Kotek, Michal Holub, J. Vetiška, Kamil Subrt, Zdenek Hadaa, P. Blecha","doi":"10.1109/MECHATRONIKA.2014.7018308","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Optical methods for measuring displacement is a key enabling technology allowing evaluate vibration of the light weighted objects. In optical evaluation of vibration of object displacement with high speed camera, systematical errors occurs in determining the displacement because of the tracking mark properties. The present article compares the results of optical tracking of four most common tracking marks (Filmmakin, Ridgeline creative, Eye fish and Blurry vision) and also own designed tracking mark (FMEIII). To verify the suitability of different tracking marks with high-speed camera, the test stand were constructed and measured data were compared to highspeed laser interferometer measurement.","PeriodicalId":430829,"journal":{"name":"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mechatronics - Mechatronika 2014","volume":"9 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of suitability of tracking marks for optical measurement of displacement\",\"authors\":\"Luboš Kotek, Michal Holub, J. Vetiška, Kamil Subrt, Zdenek Hadaa, P. Blecha\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/MECHATRONIKA.2014.7018308\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Optical methods for measuring displacement is a key enabling technology allowing evaluate vibration of the light weighted objects. In optical evaluation of vibration of object displacement with high speed camera, systematical errors occurs in determining the displacement because of the tracking mark properties. The present article compares the results of optical tracking of four most common tracking marks (Filmmakin, Ridgeline creative, Eye fish and Blurry vision) and also own designed tracking mark (FMEIII). To verify the suitability of different tracking marks with high-speed camera, the test stand were constructed and measured data were compared to highspeed laser interferometer measurement.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430829,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mechatronics - Mechatronika 2014\",\"volume\":\"9 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mechatronics - Mechatronika 2014\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/MECHATRONIKA.2014.7018308\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Proceedings of the 16th International Conference on Mechatronics - Mechatronika 2014","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/MECHATRONIKA.2014.7018308","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

光学位移测量方法是评估轻重量物体振动的关键技术。在高速相机对物体位移振动进行光学评估时,由于跟踪标记的特性,在确定位移时会产生系统误差。本文比较了四种最常见的跟踪标记(Filmmakin, Ridgeline creative, Eye fish和Blurry vision)和自己设计的跟踪标记(FMEIII)的光学跟踪结果。为了验证不同跟踪标记与高速摄像机的适用性,搭建了试验台,并与高速激光干涉仪测量数据进行了对比。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of suitability of tracking marks for optical measurement of displacement
Optical methods for measuring displacement is a key enabling technology allowing evaluate vibration of the light weighted objects. In optical evaluation of vibration of object displacement with high speed camera, systematical errors occurs in determining the displacement because of the tracking mark properties. The present article compares the results of optical tracking of four most common tracking marks (Filmmakin, Ridgeline creative, Eye fish and Blurry vision) and also own designed tracking mark (FMEIII). To verify the suitability of different tracking marks with high-speed camera, the test stand were constructed and measured data were compared to highspeed laser interferometer measurement.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信