E7及脆弱五国中等收入陷阱存在研究

A. Ozturk, Burcu Yavuz Tiftikçigil
{"title":"E7及脆弱五国中等收入陷阱存在研究","authors":"A. Ozturk, Burcu Yavuz Tiftikçigil","doi":"10.24088/ijbea-2019-53003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Among the emerging countries, those that display the most powerful economic performance, i.e., China, India, Indonesia, Brazil, Mexico, Russia and Turkey, are described as Emerging 7/Emerging economies (E7). Moreover, these E7 countries have been or are currently in a group referred to as Fragile Five, a grouping revised several times throughout the years. Fragile Five is about the relation between the countries’ economic growth and their high current account deficit and high inflation rate. It is predicted that decline in expansionary monetary policy in international economics would cause those countries to face difficulties in receiving external financing. Therefore, E7 countries in Fragile Five may be in a risky position due to inability to increase domestic savings, high dependency on external financing or volatile conditions of their economic performance indicators. This risky structure arising from mentioned factors also expose a danger for those countries to move up to upper income level without falling in the middle income trap. Hence this study investigates whether E7 and Fragile Five countries are in the middle income trap or not by using various methods and comparison techniques. The study is based on the classification created by Felipe, Abdon and Kumar using the middle income trap threshold values approach by obtaining growth rates, income transitions and times over historical data of countries. Furthermore, based on the middle income trap where per capita income cannot go beyond 20% of US GDP, since an economy would go into stagnation, this study compares GDP per capita of US with GDP per capita of E7 and Fragile Five countries. Furthermore, overall assessment is made after comparing GDP per capita of those countries with the average world middle income GDP per capita. In the light of the middle income trap definition of being stuck at 20% of per capita GDP of the USA, the per capita GDP of respective countries are compared against the per capita GDP of the USA. In addition, in line with the approach that takes world average per capita income as the basis for middle income, the per capita GDPs are compared against the world average per capita GDP values and relevant assessments are made.","PeriodicalId":208134,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Other Domestic Development Strategies (Topic)","volume":"25 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Study on the Presence of Middle Income Trap in E7 and Fragile Five Countries\",\"authors\":\"A. Ozturk, Burcu Yavuz Tiftikçigil\",\"doi\":\"10.24088/ijbea-2019-53003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Among the emerging countries, those that display the most powerful economic performance, i.e., China, India, Indonesia, Brazil, Mexico, Russia and Turkey, are described as Emerging 7/Emerging economies (E7). Moreover, these E7 countries have been or are currently in a group referred to as Fragile Five, a grouping revised several times throughout the years. Fragile Five is about the relation between the countries’ economic growth and their high current account deficit and high inflation rate. It is predicted that decline in expansionary monetary policy in international economics would cause those countries to face difficulties in receiving external financing. Therefore, E7 countries in Fragile Five may be in a risky position due to inability to increase domestic savings, high dependency on external financing or volatile conditions of their economic performance indicators. This risky structure arising from mentioned factors also expose a danger for those countries to move up to upper income level without falling in the middle income trap. Hence this study investigates whether E7 and Fragile Five countries are in the middle income trap or not by using various methods and comparison techniques. The study is based on the classification created by Felipe, Abdon and Kumar using the middle income trap threshold values approach by obtaining growth rates, income transitions and times over historical data of countries. Furthermore, based on the middle income trap where per capita income cannot go beyond 20% of US GDP, since an economy would go into stagnation, this study compares GDP per capita of US with GDP per capita of E7 and Fragile Five countries. Furthermore, overall assessment is made after comparing GDP per capita of those countries with the average world middle income GDP per capita. In the light of the middle income trap definition of being stuck at 20% of per capita GDP of the USA, the per capita GDP of respective countries are compared against the per capita GDP of the USA. In addition, in line with the approach that takes world average per capita income as the basis for middle income, the per capita GDPs are compared against the world average per capita GDP values and relevant assessments are made.\",\"PeriodicalId\":208134,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Other Domestic Development Strategies (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"25 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Other Domestic Development Strategies (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24088/ijbea-2019-53003\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Other Domestic Development Strategies (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24088/ijbea-2019-53003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在新兴国家中,经济表现最强劲的国家,即中国、印度、印度尼西亚、巴西、墨西哥、俄罗斯和土耳其,被称为新兴经济体(E7)。此外,这些E7国家曾经或目前属于一个被称为“脆弱五国”的集团,该集团多年来多次修订。“脆弱五国”是关于这些国家的经济增长与其高经常账户赤字和高通胀率之间的关系。据预测,国际经济中扩张性货币政策的下降将使这些国家在接受外部融资方面面临困难。因此,脆弱五国中的E7国家可能由于无法增加国内储蓄、高度依赖外部融资或其经济绩效指标不稳定而处于危险地位。上述因素造成的这种风险结构也给这些国家在不陷入中等收入陷阱的情况下向高收入水平迈进带来了危险。因此,本研究运用多种方法和比较技术,考察了E7和脆弱五国是否处于中等收入陷阱。该研究基于Felipe、Abdon和Kumar通过获取各国的增长率、收入转移和历史数据,使用中等收入陷阱阈值方法创建的分类。此外,基于中等收入陷阱,即人均收入不能超过美国GDP的20%,因为经济将陷入停滞,本研究将美国的人均GDP与E7和脆弱五国的人均GDP进行了比较。此外,将这些国家的人均GDP与世界中等收入国家的人均GDP进行比较,得出总体评价。根据中等收入陷阱的定义,即停留在美国人均GDP的20%,将各国的人均GDP与美国的人均GDP进行比较。此外,按照以世界平均人均收入作为中等收入基础的方法,将人均GDP与世界平均人均GDP值进行比较并进行评估。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Study on the Presence of Middle Income Trap in E7 and Fragile Five Countries
Among the emerging countries, those that display the most powerful economic performance, i.e., China, India, Indonesia, Brazil, Mexico, Russia and Turkey, are described as Emerging 7/Emerging economies (E7). Moreover, these E7 countries have been or are currently in a group referred to as Fragile Five, a grouping revised several times throughout the years. Fragile Five is about the relation between the countries’ economic growth and their high current account deficit and high inflation rate. It is predicted that decline in expansionary monetary policy in international economics would cause those countries to face difficulties in receiving external financing. Therefore, E7 countries in Fragile Five may be in a risky position due to inability to increase domestic savings, high dependency on external financing or volatile conditions of their economic performance indicators. This risky structure arising from mentioned factors also expose a danger for those countries to move up to upper income level without falling in the middle income trap. Hence this study investigates whether E7 and Fragile Five countries are in the middle income trap or not by using various methods and comparison techniques. The study is based on the classification created by Felipe, Abdon and Kumar using the middle income trap threshold values approach by obtaining growth rates, income transitions and times over historical data of countries. Furthermore, based on the middle income trap where per capita income cannot go beyond 20% of US GDP, since an economy would go into stagnation, this study compares GDP per capita of US with GDP per capita of E7 and Fragile Five countries. Furthermore, overall assessment is made after comparing GDP per capita of those countries with the average world middle income GDP per capita. In the light of the middle income trap definition of being stuck at 20% of per capita GDP of the USA, the per capita GDP of respective countries are compared against the per capita GDP of the USA. In addition, in line with the approach that takes world average per capita income as the basis for middle income, the per capita GDPs are compared against the world average per capita GDP values and relevant assessments are made.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信