巴基斯坦旁遮普省公立和私立大学质量保证实践程序中的问题和问题

Muhammad Ahsan ul Haq, Uzma Shahzadi, Sadia Ayaz
{"title":"巴基斯坦旁遮普省公立和私立大学质量保证实践程序中的问题和问题","authors":"Muhammad Ahsan ul Haq, Uzma Shahzadi, Sadia Ayaz","doi":"10.31703/grr.2020(v-iii).02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study was undertaken to find issues and problems in quality assurance practices in public and private sector higher education institutes of Punjab Pakistan. There was a total of 156 faculty members (male & female) in the selected four departments of 10 selected universities (5 from public and five from private) which constitute an accessible population of this study. All the teachers and head of departments of those selected departments were the respondents of this study. The self-constructed instrument was validated by expert opinion and pilot testing. The responses of the faculty members were measured with the help of frequency and their percentages, mean and standard deviations. Each table is formed on the basis of the variables of the study. It was concluded that the biggest hurdle in quality assurance identified by this research is the unavailability of data for quality assurance. It was recommended by the researcher that the financing system by the HEC should be revised to even the playing field even more. This could be done by expanding the needs-based scholarship program for students attending private HEIs.","PeriodicalId":347941,"journal":{"name":"Global Mass Communication Review","volume":"11 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Issues and Problems in the Procedure of Quality Assurance Practices in Public and Private Universities of Punjab, Pakistan\",\"authors\":\"Muhammad Ahsan ul Haq, Uzma Shahzadi, Sadia Ayaz\",\"doi\":\"10.31703/grr.2020(v-iii).02\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study was undertaken to find issues and problems in quality assurance practices in public and private sector higher education institutes of Punjab Pakistan. There was a total of 156 faculty members (male & female) in the selected four departments of 10 selected universities (5 from public and five from private) which constitute an accessible population of this study. All the teachers and head of departments of those selected departments were the respondents of this study. The self-constructed instrument was validated by expert opinion and pilot testing. The responses of the faculty members were measured with the help of frequency and their percentages, mean and standard deviations. Each table is formed on the basis of the variables of the study. It was concluded that the biggest hurdle in quality assurance identified by this research is the unavailability of data for quality assurance. It was recommended by the researcher that the financing system by the HEC should be revised to even the playing field even more. This could be done by expanding the needs-based scholarship program for students attending private HEIs.\",\"PeriodicalId\":347941,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Global Mass Communication Review\",\"volume\":\"11 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Global Mass Communication Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2020(v-iii).02\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Global Mass Communication Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31703/grr.2020(v-iii).02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

进行这项研究是为了发现巴基斯坦旁遮普省公立和私营高等教育机构质量保证实践中的问题和问题。在10所选定的大学(5所公立大学和5所私立大学)的四个系中,共有156名教职员工(男女)构成了本研究的可接触人群。所选院系的所有教师和系主任均为本研究的调查对象。自制仪器经专家意见和中试验证。通过频率、百分比、均值和标准差对教师的回答进行测量。每个表都是根据研究的变量形成的。得出的结论是,本研究确定的质量保证的最大障碍是无法获得质量保证的数据。研究人员建议,现代建设的融资制度应该修改,使竞争环境更加公平。这可以通过扩大私立高等教育机构学生的需求奖学金计划来实现。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Issues and Problems in the Procedure of Quality Assurance Practices in Public and Private Universities of Punjab, Pakistan
This study was undertaken to find issues and problems in quality assurance practices in public and private sector higher education institutes of Punjab Pakistan. There was a total of 156 faculty members (male & female) in the selected four departments of 10 selected universities (5 from public and five from private) which constitute an accessible population of this study. All the teachers and head of departments of those selected departments were the respondents of this study. The self-constructed instrument was validated by expert opinion and pilot testing. The responses of the faculty members were measured with the help of frequency and their percentages, mean and standard deviations. Each table is formed on the basis of the variables of the study. It was concluded that the biggest hurdle in quality assurance identified by this research is the unavailability of data for quality assurance. It was recommended by the researcher that the financing system by the HEC should be revised to even the playing field even more. This could be done by expanding the needs-based scholarship program for students attending private HEIs.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信