租了租期,什么时候

A. Schüler
{"title":"租了租期,什么时候","authors":"A. Schüler","doi":"10.3790/KUK.41.3.391","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article discusses and expands the approach for examining whether leasing is profitable for lessees. It discusses the standard approach of the financial literature after having made modifications to make this approach consistent with the German tax system. It makes clear that the comparison of lease financing with debt financing, which is the standard approach, tends to distort the results obtained. Useful for developing a calculation scheme free of distortive effects is the adjusted-present-value-approach. Besides, this article also compares lease financing with equity financing differentiated by external equity financing and financing by retained earnings. In this process, both corporation tax effects and income tax effects of the financing alternatives have to be dealt with. We have based our work on the tax regime prevailing after the 2008 corporation tax reform. It turns out that the standard approach implies a comparison with potentially disadvantageous debt financing. We advocate a step-by-step analysis of leasing offers and develop a corresponding scheme.","PeriodicalId":280048,"journal":{"name":"Kredit Und Kapital","volume":"88 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2008-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Wann lohnt Leasing für den Leasingnehmer\",\"authors\":\"A. Schüler\",\"doi\":\"10.3790/KUK.41.3.391\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article discusses and expands the approach for examining whether leasing is profitable for lessees. It discusses the standard approach of the financial literature after having made modifications to make this approach consistent with the German tax system. It makes clear that the comparison of lease financing with debt financing, which is the standard approach, tends to distort the results obtained. Useful for developing a calculation scheme free of distortive effects is the adjusted-present-value-approach. Besides, this article also compares lease financing with equity financing differentiated by external equity financing and financing by retained earnings. In this process, both corporation tax effects and income tax effects of the financing alternatives have to be dealt with. We have based our work on the tax regime prevailing after the 2008 corporation tax reform. It turns out that the standard approach implies a comparison with potentially disadvantageous debt financing. We advocate a step-by-step analysis of leasing offers and develop a corresponding scheme.\",\"PeriodicalId\":280048,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Kredit Und Kapital\",\"volume\":\"88 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2008-11-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Kredit Und Kapital\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3790/KUK.41.3.391\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Kredit Und Kapital","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3790/KUK.41.3.391","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文讨论并扩展了检验租赁对承租人是否有利可图的方法。它讨论了金融文献的标准方法后,作出修改,使这种方法与德国税收制度一致。它明确指出,将租赁融资与债务融资进行比较,这是一种标准方法,往往会扭曲所获得的结果。对于开发一种没有扭曲效应的计算方案很有用的是调整后现值法。此外,本文还将租赁融资与股权融资进行了比较,并区分了外部股权融资和留存收益融资。在此过程中,必须同时处理融资选择的公司税影响和所得税影响。我们的工作基于2008年公司税改革后的现行税制。事实证明,标准方法意味着与潜在不利的债务融资进行比较。我们主张逐步分析租赁报价,并制定相应的方案。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Wann lohnt Leasing für den Leasingnehmer
This article discusses and expands the approach for examining whether leasing is profitable for lessees. It discusses the standard approach of the financial literature after having made modifications to make this approach consistent with the German tax system. It makes clear that the comparison of lease financing with debt financing, which is the standard approach, tends to distort the results obtained. Useful for developing a calculation scheme free of distortive effects is the adjusted-present-value-approach. Besides, this article also compares lease financing with equity financing differentiated by external equity financing and financing by retained earnings. In this process, both corporation tax effects and income tax effects of the financing alternatives have to be dealt with. We have based our work on the tax regime prevailing after the 2008 corporation tax reform. It turns out that the standard approach implies a comparison with potentially disadvantageous debt financing. We advocate a step-by-step analysis of leasing offers and develop a corresponding scheme.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信