Marcellus页岩区凝胶压裂与水压裂的长期产能比较

M. A. Al-Alwani, L. Britt, S. Dunn-Norman, H. Alkinani, A. T. Al-Hameedi, A. Al-Attar
{"title":"Marcellus页岩区凝胶压裂与水压裂的长期产能比较","authors":"M. A. Al-Alwani, L. Britt, S. Dunn-Norman, H. Alkinani, A. T. Al-Hameedi, A. Al-Attar","doi":"10.2118/195990-ms","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The goal of any hydraulic fracturing stimulation is to design and execute the appropriate treatment that is best suited for the stimulated reservoir. Selecting the best treatment must achieve the desired fracture geometry to maximize long-term well productivity and reserve recovery. The main objective of this study is to conduct detailed short and long-term production and well-to-well comparisons of the different types of fracture stimulation fluids in the Marcellus Shale play.\n A database of more than 4,000 horizontal, stimulated Marcellus wells was constructed for this study. The wells were divided into four groups according to the type of treating fluid: water, gel, cross-linked, and hybrid fracs. Chemical data from FracFocus were gathered and processed then combined with completion and production data to investigate the gas short and long-term production. Detailed monthly production data for the studied wells were captured from DrillingInfo database and utilized in this study.\n This paper reports and compares the Marcellus gas initial production, the gas cumulative production at the end of the first month, first 6 months, first year, 2 years, and 5 years, according to the type of hydraulic fracturing fluid used in primary stimulation. The work provides insights into Marcellus well performance as a function of stimulation parameters such as the volume of stimulation fluid and the amount of pumped proppants. The impact of perforated lateral length is taken into consideration and used to normalize production and stimulation parameters. The study shows that water fracturing fluids outperformed the other types of hydraulic fracturing fluids.\n This paper introduces several data processing workflows that serve as a reference for individuals who are interested in extracting and processing data from the FracFocus database. It also documents the occurrence in hydraulic fracturing fluid types and measures the effects of the fracturing fluid volume and total proppant pumped on the initial and cumulative production.","PeriodicalId":325107,"journal":{"name":"Day 1 Mon, September 30, 2019","volume":"21 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-09-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Productivity Comparison of Gel and Water Fracture Stimulation in Marcellus Shale Play\",\"authors\":\"M. A. Al-Alwani, L. Britt, S. Dunn-Norman, H. Alkinani, A. T. Al-Hameedi, A. Al-Attar\",\"doi\":\"10.2118/195990-ms\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The goal of any hydraulic fracturing stimulation is to design and execute the appropriate treatment that is best suited for the stimulated reservoir. Selecting the best treatment must achieve the desired fracture geometry to maximize long-term well productivity and reserve recovery. The main objective of this study is to conduct detailed short and long-term production and well-to-well comparisons of the different types of fracture stimulation fluids in the Marcellus Shale play.\\n A database of more than 4,000 horizontal, stimulated Marcellus wells was constructed for this study. The wells were divided into four groups according to the type of treating fluid: water, gel, cross-linked, and hybrid fracs. Chemical data from FracFocus were gathered and processed then combined with completion and production data to investigate the gas short and long-term production. Detailed monthly production data for the studied wells were captured from DrillingInfo database and utilized in this study.\\n This paper reports and compares the Marcellus gas initial production, the gas cumulative production at the end of the first month, first 6 months, first year, 2 years, and 5 years, according to the type of hydraulic fracturing fluid used in primary stimulation. The work provides insights into Marcellus well performance as a function of stimulation parameters such as the volume of stimulation fluid and the amount of pumped proppants. The impact of perforated lateral length is taken into consideration and used to normalize production and stimulation parameters. The study shows that water fracturing fluids outperformed the other types of hydraulic fracturing fluids.\\n This paper introduces several data processing workflows that serve as a reference for individuals who are interested in extracting and processing data from the FracFocus database. It also documents the occurrence in hydraulic fracturing fluid types and measures the effects of the fracturing fluid volume and total proppant pumped on the initial and cumulative production.\",\"PeriodicalId\":325107,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Day 1 Mon, September 30, 2019\",\"volume\":\"21 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-09-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Day 1 Mon, September 30, 2019\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2118/195990-ms\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Day 1 Mon, September 30, 2019","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2118/195990-ms","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

任何水力压裂增产的目标都是设计并实施最适合增产储层的适当处理措施。选择最佳的压裂措施必须达到理想的裂缝形状,以最大限度地提高油井的长期产能和储量采收率。本研究的主要目的是对Marcellus页岩不同类型压裂增产液进行详细的短期和长期生产以及井与井之间的比较。为此,研究人员建立了一个包含4000多口水平井的数据库。根据处理流体的类型,将这些井分为四组:水压裂、凝胶压裂、交联压裂和混合压裂。FracFocus的化学数据被收集和处理,然后结合完井和生产数据来研究天然气的短期和长期产量。研究井的详细月度生产数据从DrillingInfo数据库中获取,并用于本研究。根据首次增产使用的水力压裂液类型,对Marcellus气藏的初始产量、第一个月末、前6个月、第一年、2年、5年的累计产量进行了报告和比较。通过这项工作,可以深入了解Marcellus井的性能与增产参数(如增产液体积和泵送支撑剂的数量)之间的关系。考虑了射孔水平段长度的影响,并用于规范生产和增产参数。研究表明,水力压裂液的性能优于其他类型的水力压裂液。本文介绍了几个数据处理工作流程,为有兴趣从FracFocus数据库中提取和处理数据的个人提供参考。它还记录了水力压裂液类型的发生情况,并测量了压裂液体积和泵送的总支撑剂对初始和累积产量的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Long-Term Productivity Comparison of Gel and Water Fracture Stimulation in Marcellus Shale Play
The goal of any hydraulic fracturing stimulation is to design and execute the appropriate treatment that is best suited for the stimulated reservoir. Selecting the best treatment must achieve the desired fracture geometry to maximize long-term well productivity and reserve recovery. The main objective of this study is to conduct detailed short and long-term production and well-to-well comparisons of the different types of fracture stimulation fluids in the Marcellus Shale play. A database of more than 4,000 horizontal, stimulated Marcellus wells was constructed for this study. The wells were divided into four groups according to the type of treating fluid: water, gel, cross-linked, and hybrid fracs. Chemical data from FracFocus were gathered and processed then combined with completion and production data to investigate the gas short and long-term production. Detailed monthly production data for the studied wells were captured from DrillingInfo database and utilized in this study. This paper reports and compares the Marcellus gas initial production, the gas cumulative production at the end of the first month, first 6 months, first year, 2 years, and 5 years, according to the type of hydraulic fracturing fluid used in primary stimulation. The work provides insights into Marcellus well performance as a function of stimulation parameters such as the volume of stimulation fluid and the amount of pumped proppants. The impact of perforated lateral length is taken into consideration and used to normalize production and stimulation parameters. The study shows that water fracturing fluids outperformed the other types of hydraulic fracturing fluids. This paper introduces several data processing workflows that serve as a reference for individuals who are interested in extracting and processing data from the FracFocus database. It also documents the occurrence in hydraulic fracturing fluid types and measures the effects of the fracturing fluid volume and total proppant pumped on the initial and cumulative production.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信