{"title":"英语情态的阿拉伯语等同","authors":"Nidaa Hussain Fahmi AL-KHAZRAJI","doi":"10.47832/2757-5403.18.22","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The paper offers a general overview for the general linguistic category of modality. This is followed by a description of modal forms in Arabic and English by discussing the linguistic resources that each one of the two languages makes use of in the realisation of modal meanings by categorizing their modal markers into homogeneous groups on the basis of their morpho-syntactic properties and type modal marking. The model of analyzing modality in the two languages is that of van der Awera and Plungian (1998). Conclusions are then drawn about the most general characteristics of the modal markers in each language. Finally, the paper is rounded off with a comparative analysis of the points of convergence and divergence in the morpho-syntactic and semantic properties of modal markers of the two languages","PeriodicalId":182370,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Humanities and Educational Research","volume":"68 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ARABIC EQUIVALENTS OF THE ENGLISH MODALITY\",\"authors\":\"Nidaa Hussain Fahmi AL-KHAZRAJI\",\"doi\":\"10.47832/2757-5403.18.22\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The paper offers a general overview for the general linguistic category of modality. This is followed by a description of modal forms in Arabic and English by discussing the linguistic resources that each one of the two languages makes use of in the realisation of modal meanings by categorizing their modal markers into homogeneous groups on the basis of their morpho-syntactic properties and type modal marking. The model of analyzing modality in the two languages is that of van der Awera and Plungian (1998). Conclusions are then drawn about the most general characteristics of the modal markers in each language. Finally, the paper is rounded off with a comparative analysis of the points of convergence and divergence in the morpho-syntactic and semantic properties of modal markers of the two languages\",\"PeriodicalId\":182370,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Humanities and Educational Research\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Humanities and Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.47832/2757-5403.18.22\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Humanities and Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.47832/2757-5403.18.22","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文对情态的一般语言范畴作了概述。接下来是对阿拉伯语和英语情态形式的描述，通过讨论这两种语言在实现情态意义时所利用的语言资源，根据它们的形态句法特性和类型情态标记将它们的情态标记分类为同质组。两种语言的情态分析模型是van der Awera和Plungian(1998)的模型。然后得出结论，每种语言中情态标记的最一般特征。最后，本文还对两种语言的情态标记语的形态句法和语义特征的趋同点和分歧点进行了比较分析
The paper offers a general overview for the general linguistic category of modality. This is followed by a description of modal forms in Arabic and English by discussing the linguistic resources that each one of the two languages makes use of in the realisation of modal meanings by categorizing their modal markers into homogeneous groups on the basis of their morpho-syntactic properties and type modal marking. The model of analyzing modality in the two languages is that of van der Awera and Plungian (1998). Conclusions are then drawn about the most general characteristics of the modal markers in each language. Finally, the paper is rounded off with a comparative analysis of the points of convergence and divergence in the morpho-syntactic and semantic properties of modal markers of the two languages
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
