{"title":"康德和贝克莱的唯心主义","authors":"Keith Ward","doi":"10.4324/9781003202851-18","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has become common in philosophy to see Immanuel Kant as a sophisticated proponent of a worldview that is shared by some scientists while Bishop G. Berkeley is referred to only as a slightly crazy adherent of the view that matter does not exist at all. Kant nevertheless called his theory ‘transcendental idealism’ and distinguished it from the ‘problematic idealism’ of Descartes and from the ‘dogmatic idealism’ of Berkeley. Berkeley often refers to his own system as ‘immaterialism,’ and this certainly suggests the idea that there is no material world. On the other hand, Berkeley most often claimed to be a common-sense philosopher, who would not deny things that common sense would affirm. Berkeley can say so much, even on the most simplistic interpretation, save that he claims to know that the ‘something’ is God.","PeriodicalId":134971,"journal":{"name":"The Routledge Handbook of Idealism and Immaterialism","volume":"81 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Idealism in Kant and Berkeley\",\"authors\":\"Keith Ward\",\"doi\":\"10.4324/9781003202851-18\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It has become common in philosophy to see Immanuel Kant as a sophisticated proponent of a worldview that is shared by some scientists while Bishop G. Berkeley is referred to only as a slightly crazy adherent of the view that matter does not exist at all. Kant nevertheless called his theory ‘transcendental idealism’ and distinguished it from the ‘problematic idealism’ of Descartes and from the ‘dogmatic idealism’ of Berkeley. Berkeley often refers to his own system as ‘immaterialism,’ and this certainly suggests the idea that there is no material world. On the other hand, Berkeley most often claimed to be a common-sense philosopher, who would not deny things that common sense would affirm. Berkeley can say so much, even on the most simplistic interpretation, save that he claims to know that the ‘something’ is God.\",\"PeriodicalId\":134971,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Routledge Handbook of Idealism and Immaterialism\",\"volume\":\"81 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Routledge Handbook of Idealism and Immaterialism\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003202851-18\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Routledge Handbook of Idealism and Immaterialism","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003202851-18","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1
摘要
在哲学界,伊曼努尔·康德(Immanuel Kant)是一些科学家共同持有的世界观的老练支持者,而主教g·伯克利(Bishop G. Berkeley)则被认为是物质根本不存在这一观点的略微疯狂的拥护者,这已经变得很普遍。尽管如此,康德还是称他的理论为“先验唯心主义”,并将其与笛卡尔的“问题唯心主义”和伯克利的“教条唯心主义”区分开来。伯克利经常把他自己的体系称为“非唯物主义”,这当然暗示了没有物质世界的想法。另一方面,贝克莱经常声称自己是一位常识哲学家,他不会否认常识所肯定的事情。伯克利除了声称知道“某物”就是上帝之外,甚至在最简单的解释上也能说很多。
It has become common in philosophy to see Immanuel Kant as a sophisticated proponent of a worldview that is shared by some scientists while Bishop G. Berkeley is referred to only as a slightly crazy adherent of the view that matter does not exist at all. Kant nevertheless called his theory ‘transcendental idealism’ and distinguished it from the ‘problematic idealism’ of Descartes and from the ‘dogmatic idealism’ of Berkeley. Berkeley often refers to his own system as ‘immaterialism,’ and this certainly suggests the idea that there is no material world. On the other hand, Berkeley most often claimed to be a common-sense philosopher, who would not deny things that common sense would affirm. Berkeley can say so much, even on the most simplistic interpretation, save that he claims to know that the ‘something’ is God.