基于模型的系统工程对可靠性增长的影响

B. Haughey
{"title":"基于模型的系统工程对可靠性增长的影响","authors":"B. Haughey","doi":"10.1109/RAMS48030.2020.9153637","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Reliability growth is the improvement in the reliability of a product based on changes in the product’s design and the manufacturing processes of the design. Product and process changes are the result of taking an action to resolve an identified issue. Image 1 shows how issues are identified two ways; “seen” failure modes as a result of testing and product usage and “unseen” failure modes as a result of engineering calculations and technical discussion. All design changes will have issues (“seen” and “unseen”) in the product design, manufacturing and assembly, and service. Reliability growth has been dependent on subjecting a product to physical testing to identify product deficiencies over the product development lifecycle. R&M in a Model-based System Engineering Environment will significantly reduce the amount of physical testing and should increase the number of discovered (seen) failure modes much sooner in the design cycle. However, that will not eliminate the need to conduct technical risk analysis to identify the unseen failure modes. Product launches are getting shorter and customers are requiring higher quality and reliability. That is why the latest SAE J1739 FMEA Standard recommends conducting a preliminary risk assessment to prioritize which areas of the product design require DFMEA and which areas of the manufacturing and assembly process require PFMEA. Conducting FMEA on the critical areas of the design and process will support the identification of unseen failure modes. However, there is a methodology to enhance the ability to identify unseen failure modes as a result of conducting a focused review of tested products. The methodology is called Design Review Based on Test Results (DRBTR). The mindset of DRBTR is to look for buds of problems (“unseen” failure modes) by studying tested products in a formal review. DRBTR takes advantage of running limited test samples by documenting observations that will address concerns for both the product and process.","PeriodicalId":360096,"journal":{"name":"2020 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Impact of Model-Based Systems Engineering on Reliability Growth\",\"authors\":\"B. Haughey\",\"doi\":\"10.1109/RAMS48030.2020.9153637\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Reliability growth is the improvement in the reliability of a product based on changes in the product’s design and the manufacturing processes of the design. Product and process changes are the result of taking an action to resolve an identified issue. Image 1 shows how issues are identified two ways; “seen” failure modes as a result of testing and product usage and “unseen” failure modes as a result of engineering calculations and technical discussion. All design changes will have issues (“seen” and “unseen”) in the product design, manufacturing and assembly, and service. Reliability growth has been dependent on subjecting a product to physical testing to identify product deficiencies over the product development lifecycle. R&M in a Model-based System Engineering Environment will significantly reduce the amount of physical testing and should increase the number of discovered (seen) failure modes much sooner in the design cycle. However, that will not eliminate the need to conduct technical risk analysis to identify the unseen failure modes. Product launches are getting shorter and customers are requiring higher quality and reliability. That is why the latest SAE J1739 FMEA Standard recommends conducting a preliminary risk assessment to prioritize which areas of the product design require DFMEA and which areas of the manufacturing and assembly process require PFMEA. Conducting FMEA on the critical areas of the design and process will support the identification of unseen failure modes. However, there is a methodology to enhance the ability to identify unseen failure modes as a result of conducting a focused review of tested products. The methodology is called Design Review Based on Test Results (DRBTR). The mindset of DRBTR is to look for buds of problems (“unseen” failure modes) by studying tested products in a formal review. DRBTR takes advantage of running limited test samples by documenting observations that will address concerns for both the product and process.\",\"PeriodicalId\":360096,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"2020 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"2020 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS48030.2020.9153637\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"2020 Annual Reliability and Maintainability Symposium (RAMS)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1109/RAMS48030.2020.9153637","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

可靠性增长是基于产品设计和设计制造过程的变化对产品可靠性的改进。产品和过程变更是采取措施解决已确定问题的结果。图1显示了如何通过两种方式识别问题;“可见”的失效模式是测试和产品使用的结果,“不可见”的失效模式是工程计算和技术讨论的结果。所有的设计变更都会在产品设计、制造、装配和服务中产生问题(“可见”和“未见”)。可靠性的增长依赖于在产品开发生命周期中对产品进行物理测试,以识别产品缺陷。基于模型的系统工程环境中的R&M将显著减少物理测试的数量,并且应该在设计周期中更快地增加发现(看到)故障模式的数量。然而,这并不能消除进行技术风险分析以识别未见的故障模式的需要。产品发布时间越来越短,客户要求更高的质量和可靠性。这就是为什么最新的SAE J1739 FMEA标准建议进行初步风险评估,以优先考虑产品设计的哪些领域需要DFMEA,哪些领域的制造和装配过程需要PFMEA。在设计和过程的关键区域进行FMEA将有助于识别未见过的失效模式。然而,有一种方法可以增强识别未见过的失效模式的能力,这是对被测试产品进行集中审查的结果。这种方法被称为基于测试结果的设计评审(DRBTR)。DRBTR的思维方式是通过在正式审查中研究测试产品来寻找问题的萌芽(“看不见的”失效模式)。DRBTR通过记录观察结果来利用运行有限的测试样本,这些观察结果将处理产品和过程的关注点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Impact of Model-Based Systems Engineering on Reliability Growth
Reliability growth is the improvement in the reliability of a product based on changes in the product’s design and the manufacturing processes of the design. Product and process changes are the result of taking an action to resolve an identified issue. Image 1 shows how issues are identified two ways; “seen” failure modes as a result of testing and product usage and “unseen” failure modes as a result of engineering calculations and technical discussion. All design changes will have issues (“seen” and “unseen”) in the product design, manufacturing and assembly, and service. Reliability growth has been dependent on subjecting a product to physical testing to identify product deficiencies over the product development lifecycle. R&M in a Model-based System Engineering Environment will significantly reduce the amount of physical testing and should increase the number of discovered (seen) failure modes much sooner in the design cycle. However, that will not eliminate the need to conduct technical risk analysis to identify the unseen failure modes. Product launches are getting shorter and customers are requiring higher quality and reliability. That is why the latest SAE J1739 FMEA Standard recommends conducting a preliminary risk assessment to prioritize which areas of the product design require DFMEA and which areas of the manufacturing and assembly process require PFMEA. Conducting FMEA on the critical areas of the design and process will support the identification of unseen failure modes. However, there is a methodology to enhance the ability to identify unseen failure modes as a result of conducting a focused review of tested products. The methodology is called Design Review Based on Test Results (DRBTR). The mindset of DRBTR is to look for buds of problems (“unseen” failure modes) by studying tested products in a formal review. DRBTR takes advantage of running limited test samples by documenting observations that will address concerns for both the product and process.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信