慢性假小子:朱迪·福斯特作品中的女权主义、生存与偏执

Lynne Stahl
{"title":"慢性假小子:朱迪·福斯特作品中的女权主义、生存与偏执","authors":"Lynne Stahl","doi":"10.7560/VLT7704","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"From Freaky Friday (1976) to Flightplan (2005), Jodie Foster has made a career of defying gender norms, a defiance predicated largely upon her characteristically tom-boyish embodiment and a mode of being that combines activeness, visual agency, and a distinctively resistant demeanor that spans her body of work to the extent that one can hardly watch any one of her films without involuntary recourse to her earlier and later movies. This essay takes up David Fincher’s Panic Room (2002), which unites tomboy figures of two generations in Foster and Kristen Stewart and works, in light of the former’s corpus and its feminist bent, to refuse the trope that sees tomboyism capitulate to heteronormative strictures in adolescence. Instead, Panic Room reproduces that embodied resistance in an adult through interactions with her daughter. The essay then proceeds further into the films of an iconic tomboy actress to posit a mode of queer feminist reproductivity enacted through Foster’s star image and a recuperation of feminist “paranoia” through the consistent critique of heteronormativity that her aggregate body of work performs. Moreover, it addresses debates within queer theory about time, refuting antisocial currents—the push against “for-the-child” sentiments predominant in contemporary political rhetoric—and proposing an alternative, recursive temporality, and, within the field of feminist film studies, demonstrating a subversive potential within commercial narrative film across the span of one Hollywood star’s career.","PeriodicalId":335072,"journal":{"name":"The Velvet Light Trap","volume":"22 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-02-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Chronic Tomboys: Feminism, Survival, and Paranoia in Jodie Foster’s Body of Work\",\"authors\":\"Lynne Stahl\",\"doi\":\"10.7560/VLT7704\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"From Freaky Friday (1976) to Flightplan (2005), Jodie Foster has made a career of defying gender norms, a defiance predicated largely upon her characteristically tom-boyish embodiment and a mode of being that combines activeness, visual agency, and a distinctively resistant demeanor that spans her body of work to the extent that one can hardly watch any one of her films without involuntary recourse to her earlier and later movies. This essay takes up David Fincher’s Panic Room (2002), which unites tomboy figures of two generations in Foster and Kristen Stewart and works, in light of the former’s corpus and its feminist bent, to refuse the trope that sees tomboyism capitulate to heteronormative strictures in adolescence. Instead, Panic Room reproduces that embodied resistance in an adult through interactions with her daughter. The essay then proceeds further into the films of an iconic tomboy actress to posit a mode of queer feminist reproductivity enacted through Foster’s star image and a recuperation of feminist “paranoia” through the consistent critique of heteronormativity that her aggregate body of work performs. Moreover, it addresses debates within queer theory about time, refuting antisocial currents—the push against “for-the-child” sentiments predominant in contemporary political rhetoric—and proposing an alternative, recursive temporality, and, within the field of feminist film studies, demonstrating a subversive potential within commercial narrative film across the span of one Hollywood star’s career.\",\"PeriodicalId\":335072,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The Velvet Light Trap\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-02-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The Velvet Light Trap\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7560/VLT7704\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The Velvet Light Trap","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7560/VLT7704","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

从《恐怖星期五》(1976)到《飞行计划》(2005),朱迪·福斯特的职业生涯一直在挑战性别规范,这种挑战主要基于她典型的男扮女装形象,以及一种结合了活跃、视觉代理和独特抵抗气质的存在模式,这种模式贯穿了她的作品,以至于人们几乎看不完她的任何一部电影,就会不由自主地想起她早期和后来的电影。本文以大卫·芬奇(David Fincher)的《恐慌屋》(2002)为例,这部小说将福斯特和克里斯汀·斯图尔特的两代假小子形象结合在一起,并根据前者的语体及其女权主义倾向,拒绝将假小子主义视为在青春期屈服于异性恋规范约束的修辞。相反,《恐慌屋》通过与一个成年人的女儿互动,再现了她身上体现出来的抗拒。然后,文章进一步深入到一个标志性的假小子女演员的电影中,通过福斯特的明星形象来假设一种酷儿女权主义的繁殖模式,并通过对她的作品所表现的异性恋规范的一贯批评来恢复女权主义的“偏执”。此外,它还讨论了酷儿理论中关于时间的争论,反驳了反社会的潮流——反对当代政治修辞中主导的“为了孩子”的情绪——并提出了另一种选择,递归的时间性,并在女权主义电影研究领域内,展示了一个好莱坞明星职业生涯中商业叙事电影的颠覆性潜力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Chronic Tomboys: Feminism, Survival, and Paranoia in Jodie Foster’s Body of Work
From Freaky Friday (1976) to Flightplan (2005), Jodie Foster has made a career of defying gender norms, a defiance predicated largely upon her characteristically tom-boyish embodiment and a mode of being that combines activeness, visual agency, and a distinctively resistant demeanor that spans her body of work to the extent that one can hardly watch any one of her films without involuntary recourse to her earlier and later movies. This essay takes up David Fincher’s Panic Room (2002), which unites tomboy figures of two generations in Foster and Kristen Stewart and works, in light of the former’s corpus and its feminist bent, to refuse the trope that sees tomboyism capitulate to heteronormative strictures in adolescence. Instead, Panic Room reproduces that embodied resistance in an adult through interactions with her daughter. The essay then proceeds further into the films of an iconic tomboy actress to posit a mode of queer feminist reproductivity enacted through Foster’s star image and a recuperation of feminist “paranoia” through the consistent critique of heteronormativity that her aggregate body of work performs. Moreover, it addresses debates within queer theory about time, refuting antisocial currents—the push against “for-the-child” sentiments predominant in contemporary political rhetoric—and proposing an alternative, recursive temporality, and, within the field of feminist film studies, demonstrating a subversive potential within commercial narrative film across the span of one Hollywood star’s career.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信