Ardini Octaviarini
{"title":"KEPAILITAN BUMN YANG DIMOHONKAN ATAS DASAR HAK – HAK BURUH YANG TIDAK DIPENUHI","authors":"Ardini Octaviarini","doi":"10.31090/HUKUMBISNIS.V3I1.833","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BUMN are private corporate entities so that the laws governing Manpower are applicable to Law 13 of 2003. Therefore, the normative rights set forth in Law No. 13 of 2003 must be met by companies for their workers. These normative rights are, among others, when the Bankrupt Company, ie, a one time severance pay under the provisions of Article 156 Paragraph 2, severance pay for a one-time stipulation of Article 156 paragraph 3 and compensation pay pursuant to paragraph 156 4. Where there is labor rights is not fulfilled by a state-owned enterprise, workers may file for bankruptcy in the company, in its qualification as a Preferen creditor. Based on the research, the state-owned enterprises should be clearly stated in a company to protect the company's existing components in case of Bankruptcy, if the State participates, there must be at least 51% of the shares therein, so that the control, regulation and controlling functions performed the government is clear that the company's goals are achieved. It is necessary to have the same meaning / meaning as the state-owned enterprise which is engaged in public interest. Because of Article 2 paragraph 5 of Law No. 37 of 2004 with the explanation is not in line. Article 2 paragraph 5 of the Law on Bankruptcy refers to state-owned enterprises in the field of public interest, while in the explanation states that state-owned all state-owned capital and not divided into shares. Between the contents of the article and the explanation is not synchronized, then the provisions should be mentioned directly Perum, in order to achieve legal certainty. \n ","PeriodicalId":134994,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal HUKUM BISNIS","volume":"10 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-05-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal HUKUM BISNIS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31090/HUKUMBISNIS.V3I1.833","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本公司是私营公司实体,因此有关万宝盛华的法律适用于2003年第13号法律。因此,2003年第13号法律规定的规范性权利必须由公司为其工人实现。这些规范性权利,除其他外,为破产公司,即第一百五十六条第二项规定的一次性遣散费、第一百五十六条第三项规定的一次性遣散费和第一百五十六条第四项规定的赔偿金。国有企业未履行劳动权利的,劳动者可以向该企业申请破产,使其具有优先债权人资格。根据研究,国有企业应该在公司中明确规定,在公司破产的情况下保护公司现有的组成部分,如果国家参与,其中必须至少有51%的股份,这样政府所履行的控制、监管和控制功能就明确了,公司的目标就实现了。有必要与从事公共利益的国有企业具有相同的意义。由于2004年第37号法律第2条第5款的解释不一致。《破产法》第二条第五款是指公共利益领域的国有企业,而在解释中则写明国有所有国有资本且不分割为股份。条文的内容与解释之间不同步的,则应直接提及条文,以达到法律上的确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
KEPAILITAN BUMN YANG DIMOHONKAN ATAS DASAR HAK – HAK BURUH YANG TIDAK DIPENUHI
BUMN are private corporate entities so that the laws governing Manpower are applicable to Law 13 of 2003. Therefore, the normative rights set forth in Law No. 13 of 2003 must be met by companies for their workers. These normative rights are, among others, when the Bankrupt Company, ie, a one time severance pay under the provisions of Article 156 Paragraph 2, severance pay for a one-time stipulation of Article 156 paragraph 3 and compensation pay pursuant to paragraph 156 4. Where there is labor rights is not fulfilled by a state-owned enterprise, workers may file for bankruptcy in the company, in its qualification as a Preferen creditor. Based on the research, the state-owned enterprises should be clearly stated in a company to protect the company's existing components in case of Bankruptcy, if the State participates, there must be at least 51% of the shares therein, so that the control, regulation and controlling functions performed the government is clear that the company's goals are achieved. It is necessary to have the same meaning / meaning as the state-owned enterprise which is engaged in public interest. Because of Article 2 paragraph 5 of Law No. 37 of 2004 with the explanation is not in line. Article 2 paragraph 5 of the Law on Bankruptcy refers to state-owned enterprises in the field of public interest, while in the explanation states that state-owned all state-owned capital and not divided into shares. Between the contents of the article and the explanation is not synchronized, then the provisions should be mentioned directly Perum, in order to achieve legal certainty.  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信