矛盾性别歧视清单:性别因素不变性及其与伴侣暴力的关系

Karin Arbach, Marcelo Vaiman, Antonella Bobbio, Jorge A. Bruera, Agostina Lumello
{"title":"矛盾性别歧视清单:性别因素不变性及其与伴侣暴力的关系","authors":"Karin Arbach, Marcelo Vaiman, Antonella Bobbio, Jorge A. Bruera, Agostina Lumello","doi":"10.16888/I.V36I1.581","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Ambivalent Sexism Theory proposes that sexism is a multidimensional construct composed of two types of sexist beliefs, on the one hand, hostile and, on the other hand, benevolent. The first refers to negative attitudes towards women as weak and inferior to men, and the second refers to the set of sexist attitudes towards women considering them stereotyped and limited to certain roles (i.e. mother, wife, and housewife). The main objective of this study was to analyse the factor structure and factorial invariance by gender of the instrument derived from this theory and its concurrent validity with a measure of intimate partner physical violence. Another objective of the study was to establish comparisons in ISA scores by gender and crossculturally. The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI)(Glick & Fiske, 1996) was answered through an online form by 745 participants of both sexes from an Argentinean general population sample aged between 18 and 45 years old. By means of a confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis the data in this sample showed a good adjustment to the ASI structure proposed by its authors, this is a one-dimensional factor (SH) and three subfactors (protective paternalism, complementary gender differentiation and heterosexual intimacy) that make up the second-order factor SB. This factorial structure remained invariant when discriminating between men and women. The correlation between both factors was robust and significant (r= .68) both in the general sample, and differentiating by gender. The reliability of the factors and subfactors was between a moderate and high level (α= .62 to .91). No significant differences were found between men and women in the mean scores of the ASI factors and subfactors. Approximately 1 in 3 subjects reported having perpetrated or suffered intimate partner physical violence. In general terms, those who have perpetrated or havesuffered violence had higher scores in SH and SB that those who did not, but this effect was only significant in the case of women. The relationships found between ASI scores and intimate partner physical violence varied by gender and violence directionality (suffered or perpetrated). The ASI scores were lower in countries close to Argentina probably due to a sample mainly composed by young women with a high education level. Our results support the idea that ambivalent sexism is an invariable transcultural construct between men and women, and that the ISA is a valid and reliable measure in the Argentine population. The limitations of results are discussed and the implications are analyses in light of previous studies using the ASI, mainly in Spanishspeaking population.","PeriodicalId":356502,"journal":{"name":"Interdisciplinaria: Revista de Psicología y Ciencias Afines","volume":"17 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Inventario de Sexismo Ambivalente: Invarianza factorial entre géneros y relación con la violencia de pareja\",\"authors\":\"Karin Arbach, Marcelo Vaiman, Antonella Bobbio, Jorge A. Bruera, Agostina Lumello\",\"doi\":\"10.16888/I.V36I1.581\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Ambivalent Sexism Theory proposes that sexism is a multidimensional construct composed of two types of sexist beliefs, on the one hand, hostile and, on the other hand, benevolent. The first refers to negative attitudes towards women as weak and inferior to men, and the second refers to the set of sexist attitudes towards women considering them stereotyped and limited to certain roles (i.e. mother, wife, and housewife). The main objective of this study was to analyse the factor structure and factorial invariance by gender of the instrument derived from this theory and its concurrent validity with a measure of intimate partner physical violence. Another objective of the study was to establish comparisons in ISA scores by gender and crossculturally. The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI)(Glick & Fiske, 1996) was answered through an online form by 745 participants of both sexes from an Argentinean general population sample aged between 18 and 45 years old. By means of a confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis the data in this sample showed a good adjustment to the ASI structure proposed by its authors, this is a one-dimensional factor (SH) and three subfactors (protective paternalism, complementary gender differentiation and heterosexual intimacy) that make up the second-order factor SB. This factorial structure remained invariant when discriminating between men and women. The correlation between both factors was robust and significant (r= .68) both in the general sample, and differentiating by gender. The reliability of the factors and subfactors was between a moderate and high level (α= .62 to .91). No significant differences were found between men and women in the mean scores of the ASI factors and subfactors. Approximately 1 in 3 subjects reported having perpetrated or suffered intimate partner physical violence. In general terms, those who have perpetrated or havesuffered violence had higher scores in SH and SB that those who did not, but this effect was only significant in the case of women. The relationships found between ASI scores and intimate partner physical violence varied by gender and violence directionality (suffered or perpetrated). The ASI scores were lower in countries close to Argentina probably due to a sample mainly composed by young women with a high education level. Our results support the idea that ambivalent sexism is an invariable transcultural construct between men and women, and that the ISA is a valid and reliable measure in the Argentine population. The limitations of results are discussed and the implications are analyses in light of previous studies using the ASI, mainly in Spanishspeaking population.\",\"PeriodicalId\":356502,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Interdisciplinaria: Revista de Psicología y Ciencias Afines\",\"volume\":\"17 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"5\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Interdisciplinaria: Revista de Psicología y Ciencias Afines\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.16888/I.V36I1.581\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Interdisciplinaria: Revista de Psicología y Ciencias Afines","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.16888/I.V36I1.581","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

摘要

矛盾性别歧视理论认为,性别歧视是由两种性别歧视信念组成的多维结构,一方面是敌对的,另一方面是仁慈的。前者指的是对女性的消极态度,认为女性弱于男性,不如男性;后者指的是对女性的一套性别歧视态度,认为她们被定型,局限于某些角色(即母亲、妻子和家庭主妇)。本研究的主要目的是分析从该理论衍生的工具的因素结构和性别的因素不变性,以及其与亲密伴侣身体暴力测量的同时有效性。该研究的另一个目的是建立性别和跨文化的ISA分数的比较。《矛盾性别歧视量表》(Glick & Fiske, 1996)是由745名年龄在18至45岁的阿根廷普通人群中的男女参与者通过在线表格填写的。通过验证性最大似然因子分析,该样本的数据显示了对作者提出的ASI结构的良好调整,即一个一维因素(SH)和三个子因素(保护性家长制、互补性性别分化和异性恋亲密关系)构成了二级因素SB。该因子结构在区分男女时保持不变。无论在一般样本中,还是在性别差异中,这两个因素之间的相关性都是稳健且显著的(r= 0.68)。各因子和子因子的信度均在中高水平之间(α= 0.62 ~ 0.91)。男性和女性在ASI因素和亚因素的平均得分上没有显著差异。大约三分之一的受试者报告曾实施或遭受过亲密伴侣的身体暴力。一般来说,那些实施暴力或遭受暴力的人在SH和SB方面的得分高于那些没有暴力的人,但这种影响只在女性的情况下显着。ASI分数与亲密伴侣身体暴力之间的关系因性别和暴力方向(遭受或实施)而异。在靠近阿根廷的国家,ASI得分较低,可能是因为样本主要由受过高等教育的年轻女性组成。我们的研究结果支持这样一种观点,即矛盾的性别歧视是男性和女性之间不变的跨文化结构,ISA是阿根廷人口中有效和可靠的衡量标准。讨论了结果的局限性,并根据先前使用ASI的研究分析了其含义,主要是在讲西班牙语的人群中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Inventario de Sexismo Ambivalente: Invarianza factorial entre géneros y relación con la violencia de pareja
The Ambivalent Sexism Theory proposes that sexism is a multidimensional construct composed of two types of sexist beliefs, on the one hand, hostile and, on the other hand, benevolent. The first refers to negative attitudes towards women as weak and inferior to men, and the second refers to the set of sexist attitudes towards women considering them stereotyped and limited to certain roles (i.e. mother, wife, and housewife). The main objective of this study was to analyse the factor structure and factorial invariance by gender of the instrument derived from this theory and its concurrent validity with a measure of intimate partner physical violence. Another objective of the study was to establish comparisons in ISA scores by gender and crossculturally. The Ambivalent Sexism Inventory (ASI)(Glick & Fiske, 1996) was answered through an online form by 745 participants of both sexes from an Argentinean general population sample aged between 18 and 45 years old. By means of a confirmatory maximum likelihood factor analysis the data in this sample showed a good adjustment to the ASI structure proposed by its authors, this is a one-dimensional factor (SH) and three subfactors (protective paternalism, complementary gender differentiation and heterosexual intimacy) that make up the second-order factor SB. This factorial structure remained invariant when discriminating between men and women. The correlation between both factors was robust and significant (r= .68) both in the general sample, and differentiating by gender. The reliability of the factors and subfactors was between a moderate and high level (α= .62 to .91). No significant differences were found between men and women in the mean scores of the ASI factors and subfactors. Approximately 1 in 3 subjects reported having perpetrated or suffered intimate partner physical violence. In general terms, those who have perpetrated or havesuffered violence had higher scores in SH and SB that those who did not, but this effect was only significant in the case of women. The relationships found between ASI scores and intimate partner physical violence varied by gender and violence directionality (suffered or perpetrated). The ASI scores were lower in countries close to Argentina probably due to a sample mainly composed by young women with a high education level. Our results support the idea that ambivalent sexism is an invariable transcultural construct between men and women, and that the ISA is a valid and reliable measure in the Argentine population. The limitations of results are discussed and the implications are analyses in light of previous studies using the ASI, mainly in Spanishspeaking population.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信