使社会保障适应21世纪印度经济:一个普遍化的案例

S. Bhattacharjee
{"title":"使社会保障适应21世纪印度经济:一个普遍化的案例","authors":"S. Bhattacharjee","doi":"10.2139/ssrn.3060301","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Proliferation of social security has been one of the integral features of the modern industrialised world. In India too, social security has not only been enshrined as a constitutional mandate, but has also been embodied in a wide variety of legislation. Yet, multiplicity of legislation has created errors of harmonisation and engendered a regime riddled with variance in legal standards and rights of workers. Along with these inconsistencies and gaps, the centrality of the status of employment in extant regimes has excluded a large number of workers who fall through the crack. Such exclusion has been exacerbated by the occupation-centricity of these schemes that is ill-suited to the ongoing transformation in the labour economy and demographic changes. In view of these shortcomings, a shift to universal citizenship-based social security schemes is advocated. Delinking social security from occupation and predicating it on citizenship would extend these schemes to informal atypical workers and persons out of work and thereby make the constitutional right of social security a substantive entitlement for our citizenry.","PeriodicalId":430314,"journal":{"name":"PSN: Pensions & Retirement (Topic)","volume":"23 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2016-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Adapting Social Security to 21st Century Indian Economy: A Case for Universalisation\",\"authors\":\"S. Bhattacharjee\",\"doi\":\"10.2139/ssrn.3060301\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Proliferation of social security has been one of the integral features of the modern industrialised world. In India too, social security has not only been enshrined as a constitutional mandate, but has also been embodied in a wide variety of legislation. Yet, multiplicity of legislation has created errors of harmonisation and engendered a regime riddled with variance in legal standards and rights of workers. Along with these inconsistencies and gaps, the centrality of the status of employment in extant regimes has excluded a large number of workers who fall through the crack. Such exclusion has been exacerbated by the occupation-centricity of these schemes that is ill-suited to the ongoing transformation in the labour economy and demographic changes. In view of these shortcomings, a shift to universal citizenship-based social security schemes is advocated. Delinking social security from occupation and predicating it on citizenship would extend these schemes to informal atypical workers and persons out of work and thereby make the constitutional right of social security a substantive entitlement for our citizenry.\",\"PeriodicalId\":430314,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PSN: Pensions & Retirement (Topic)\",\"volume\":\"23 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2016-10-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PSN: Pensions & Retirement (Topic)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3060301\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PSN: Pensions & Retirement (Topic)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3060301","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社会保障的扩散是现代工业化世界的一个不可分割的特征。在印度也是如此,社会保障不仅被庄严载入宪法,而且还体现在各种各样的立法中。然而,立法的多样性造成了协调的错误,并产生了一个在法律标准和工人权利方面充满差异的制度。随着这些不一致和差距,就业地位在现有制度中的中心地位已经排除了大量从裂缝中掉下来的工人。这些计划以职业为中心,不适合正在进行的劳动经济转型和人口变化,加剧了这种排斥。鉴于这些缺点,有人主张转向以全民公民权为基础的社会保障计划。将社会保障与职业脱钩并以公民身份为依据,将把这些计划扩展到非正式的非典型工人和失业人员,从而使社会保障的宪法权利成为我们公民的实质性权利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Adapting Social Security to 21st Century Indian Economy: A Case for Universalisation
Proliferation of social security has been one of the integral features of the modern industrialised world. In India too, social security has not only been enshrined as a constitutional mandate, but has also been embodied in a wide variety of legislation. Yet, multiplicity of legislation has created errors of harmonisation and engendered a regime riddled with variance in legal standards and rights of workers. Along with these inconsistencies and gaps, the centrality of the status of employment in extant regimes has excluded a large number of workers who fall through the crack. Such exclusion has been exacerbated by the occupation-centricity of these schemes that is ill-suited to the ongoing transformation in the labour economy and demographic changes. In view of these shortcomings, a shift to universal citizenship-based social security schemes is advocated. Delinking social security from occupation and predicating it on citizenship would extend these schemes to informal atypical workers and persons out of work and thereby make the constitutional right of social security a substantive entitlement for our citizenry.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信