{"title":"进出口银行诉格林纳达案:澄清还是混淆?","authors":"Cheng-Yun Tsang","doi":"10.1093/CMLJ/KMV022","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"As the first copycat litigation of NML Capital v. Argentina, the case of Export-Import Bank of the Republic of China v. Grenada (\"Ex-Im Bank v. Grenada\") has implications for the future direction of sovereign debt restructurings. It not only complicates the already muddy pari passu saga by involving official lenders and judgment debts but also potentially exacerbates the holdout problem by marching into a whole new battle over the negative pledge clause. This article offers an analysis of the case, and draws out its policy and practical implications.","PeriodicalId":275936,"journal":{"name":"Duke Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series","volume":"51 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2014-08-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ex-Im Bank v Grenada: Adding Clarity or Confusion?\",\"authors\":\"Cheng-Yun Tsang\",\"doi\":\"10.1093/CMLJ/KMV022\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"As the first copycat litigation of NML Capital v. Argentina, the case of Export-Import Bank of the Republic of China v. Grenada (\\\"Ex-Im Bank v. Grenada\\\") has implications for the future direction of sovereign debt restructurings. It not only complicates the already muddy pari passu saga by involving official lenders and judgment debts but also potentially exacerbates the holdout problem by marching into a whole new battle over the negative pledge clause. This article offers an analysis of the case, and draws out its policy and practical implications.\",\"PeriodicalId\":275936,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Duke Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series\",\"volume\":\"51 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2014-08-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Duke Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1093/CMLJ/KMV022\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Duke Law School Public Law & Legal Theory Research Paper Series","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/CMLJ/KMV022","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
Ex-Im Bank v Grenada: Adding Clarity or Confusion?
As the first copycat litigation of NML Capital v. Argentina, the case of Export-Import Bank of the Republic of China v. Grenada ("Ex-Im Bank v. Grenada") has implications for the future direction of sovereign debt restructurings. It not only complicates the already muddy pari passu saga by involving official lenders and judgment debts but also potentially exacerbates the holdout problem by marching into a whole new battle over the negative pledge clause. This article offers an analysis of the case, and draws out its policy and practical implications.
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号
