分析Youtube上腹腔镜子宫切除术视频教学内容的质量和可靠性

E. Öztürk
{"title":"分析Youtube上腹腔镜子宫切除术视频教学内容的质量和可靠性","authors":"E. Öztürk","doi":"10.46328/aejog.v5i1.136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality, reliability, and usefulness of laparoscopıc hysterectomy videos on YouTube.\nMethods: A search was conducted on YouTube using the keyword \" laparoscopıc hysterectomy\". The search results were limited to the first 400 videos. 330 videos that met the inclusion criteria were examined. Viewer parameters such as likes and dislikes, total views, comments, and sources were evaluated. The educational content of the videos was evaluated using the Global Quality Score. Additionally, the popularity of the videos was evaluated using the Video Power Index. Upload sources were categorized as academic institutions and individual users.\nResults: Group 1 (low and medium quality videos) had 234 (70.9%) videos and group 2 (good and excellent quality videos) had 96 (20.1%) videos. The average views, likes, and comments in group 1 were 20589±23552 , 86±113 , and 28±31, respectively, while in group 2, they were 25571±24541 , 174±198 , and 49±42 , respectively. When the two groups were compared, no correlation was found between the length and quality of the videos.There was no difference between the groups in terms of the number of dislikes Additionally, the VPI values in group 2 were statistically higher than those in group 1 (p = 0.003).\nConclusion: Only 20.1 % of laparoscopıc hysterectomy videos on YouTube are of good and excellent quality, indicating that a significant portion of videos providing laparoscopıc hysterectomy education are inadequate.","PeriodicalId":159256,"journal":{"name":"Aegean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","volume":"1 1","pages":"0"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Analyzing the quality and reliability of educational content in laparoscopic hysterectomy videos on Youtube\",\"authors\":\"E. Öztürk\",\"doi\":\"10.46328/aejog.v5i1.136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality, reliability, and usefulness of laparoscopıc hysterectomy videos on YouTube.\\nMethods: A search was conducted on YouTube using the keyword \\\" laparoscopıc hysterectomy\\\". The search results were limited to the first 400 videos. 330 videos that met the inclusion criteria were examined. Viewer parameters such as likes and dislikes, total views, comments, and sources were evaluated. The educational content of the videos was evaluated using the Global Quality Score. Additionally, the popularity of the videos was evaluated using the Video Power Index. Upload sources were categorized as academic institutions and individual users.\\nResults: Group 1 (low and medium quality videos) had 234 (70.9%) videos and group 2 (good and excellent quality videos) had 96 (20.1%) videos. The average views, likes, and comments in group 1 were 20589±23552 , 86±113 , and 28±31, respectively, while in group 2, they were 25571±24541 , 174±198 , and 49±42 , respectively. When the two groups were compared, no correlation was found between the length and quality of the videos.There was no difference between the groups in terms of the number of dislikes Additionally, the VPI values in group 2 were statistically higher than those in group 1 (p = 0.003).\\nConclusion: Only 20.1 % of laparoscopıc hysterectomy videos on YouTube are of good and excellent quality, indicating that a significant portion of videos providing laparoscopıc hysterectomy education are inadequate.\",\"PeriodicalId\":159256,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Aegean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"volume\":\"1 1\",\"pages\":\"0\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-06-18\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Aegean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.46328/aejog.v5i1.136\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Aegean Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.46328/aejog.v5i1.136","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究的目的是评估YouTube上laparoscopıc子宫切除术视频的质量、可靠性和实用性。方法:在YouTube上搜索关键词“laparoscopıc子宫切除术”。搜索结果仅限于前400个视频。对符合纳入标准的330个视频进行了审查。观众参数,如喜欢和不喜欢,总浏览量,评论,和来源进行评估。视频的教育内容使用全球质量评分进行评估。此外,视频的受欢迎程度是用视频功率指数来评估的。上传源分为学术机构和个人用户。结果:1组(中低质量视频)有234个(70.9%),2组(良、优质量视频)有96个(20.1%)。组1的平均浏览量、点赞数和评论数分别为20589±23552、86±113和28±31,组2的平均浏览量分别为25571±24541、174±198和49±42。当两组进行比较时,发现视频的长度和质量之间没有相关性。两组不喜欢的次数差异无统计学意义(p = 0.003), 2组VPI值高于1组(p = 0.003)。结论:YouTube上laparoscopıc子宫切除术视频中质量优良的仅占20.1%,说明有相当一部分laparoscopıc子宫切除术教育视频存在不足。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Analyzing the quality and reliability of educational content in laparoscopic hysterectomy videos on Youtube
Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the quality, reliability, and usefulness of laparoscopıc hysterectomy videos on YouTube. Methods: A search was conducted on YouTube using the keyword " laparoscopıc hysterectomy". The search results were limited to the first 400 videos. 330 videos that met the inclusion criteria were examined. Viewer parameters such as likes and dislikes, total views, comments, and sources were evaluated. The educational content of the videos was evaluated using the Global Quality Score. Additionally, the popularity of the videos was evaluated using the Video Power Index. Upload sources were categorized as academic institutions and individual users. Results: Group 1 (low and medium quality videos) had 234 (70.9%) videos and group 2 (good and excellent quality videos) had 96 (20.1%) videos. The average views, likes, and comments in group 1 were 20589±23552 , 86±113 , and 28±31, respectively, while in group 2, they were 25571±24541 , 174±198 , and 49±42 , respectively. When the two groups were compared, no correlation was found between the length and quality of the videos.There was no difference between the groups in terms of the number of dislikes Additionally, the VPI values in group 2 were statistically higher than those in group 1 (p = 0.003). Conclusion: Only 20.1 % of laparoscopıc hysterectomy videos on YouTube are of good and excellent quality, indicating that a significant portion of videos providing laparoscopıc hysterectomy education are inadequate.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信